Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dear God - he's finally gone off the deep end!
I'll make you a deal, Max. I'll pretend I'm an uncomprehending idiot, and go along with the Democrat Party's game. I'll call them the Democratic Party.
But, in the interest of consistency of form and usage, you must hereafter refer to my party as the Republican doesn't instinctively blame America for all the world's ills like some DEMOCRATIC parties I know Party.
That way, see, each of us is not only identifying the other's party - we're actually describing it to the other's satisfaction.
ScreamingEagle said:This has been an interesting discussion (kudos to MM) in that it points to the inherent dishonesty found among liberals and showcases their incessant twisting of the English language to further their political agenda. Of course this is only one tiny example among many. It is this systemic and ingrained liberal dishonesty (and their uneducated, ignorant busy body followers) that makes them so dangerous. Control of our language through political correctness and arbitrary redefinitions can lead to thought control if undeterred.
But in this case have it your way MaxPower....I'll refer to it as the
DemocratICKParty. :cof:
Is it even possible to distract demowhatevers from this any more then they already are? Is there a threshold?no1tovote4 said:It keeps them worried about ic instead of making an actual positive plan to get their members elected.
Just a note on Clinton. In either election he won he did not receive a majority of the votes. He only got a plurality. Big difference! President Bush got a majority for re-election!!! Democrats can not stand that fact!
Hagbard Celine said:Republicans can't stand the fact that the Supreme Court appointed Bush to be president his first term.