I Read Biden’s Build Back Better Plan and…Oh, My God

Do you have a legitimate source. The source you gave is considered questionable....?

Mediabias.com

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Taki’s Magazine as Questionable based on extreme right-wing editorial bias and affiliation with those labeled as promoters of hate.

Detailed Report​

Reasoning: Propaganda, Hate Group
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA (44/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Founded on February 5, 2007, Taki’s Magazine is an extreme right-wing online magazine of politics and culture published by journalist Taki Theodoracopulos. According to a Guardian article entitled “The way of the Jackal,” Taki Theodoracopulos has racist views.
Taki’s Magazine proclaims on its about page: “Our only ideology is to be against the junk culture foisted upon us by Hollywood and the mainstream media, and mirages of a new world order.” Taki’s Magazine’s former Executive Editor was Richard Spencer, an American white supremacist who coined the term Alternative Right. Gavin McInnes, the founder of the hate group known as the Proud Boys, wrote his last column entitled “So Long, Taki!” He has been described in media reports as a significant figure within the alt-right movement. Gavin McInnes has also been featured in Hatewatch articles by the Southern Poverty Law Center, found here and here.

___________________

But even if your article is true, the things you posted for minorities of color adds up to about $2 to $3 billion out of a $2.0 trillion dollar bill....that's 2000 BILLION DOLLARS..... Spending $2 billion, just 1/10 of 1% of the money in the bill, to help 40% of Americans that fall in to that category of minorities, it's really not this outrageous amount as these authors describe and try to get you upset over.... Even if they were spending 10 times more than the $2 billion you listed, or even 100 times that amount, $200 billion spent, it's still way below 40% of the 2000 billion in the bill which would be $800 billion being spent on minorities.

This is what questionable sources do....they promote hatred, outrage, even tickle people in to violence. Be aware! Be careful not to let yourself be dragged in to this kind of intentional deceit and hatefulness and jealousy....

The White House website.
 
The poorest white people live in places where conservatives have ruled unopposed for many decades yet somehow they stupidly blame liberals for all their problems rather than their own leaders. They demand the safety net be dismantled because it helps blacks and then bitch that no one cares enough to help them. Quit trying to spite blacks out of opportunity because you are only spiting yourself. If we are going to throw money at the poorest Americans some of them are going to be black, deal with it.
The poor by the edicts of the Democrats from the mid 1960's should not exist. White people who are poor are not on the top of the pecking order for free stuff enmasse.
 
Those things are aimed at poor people. You do know that there are more poor white people than any other race, right.

LOL

From the OP:



— $1 billion to Native American, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian communities for housing “needs.”

— $500 million for minority-serving schools of medicine.

— $112 million for teacher preparation programs at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and Minority Serving Institutions (MSIs).

— $75 million for culturally appropriate care management and services for older individuals who are racial and ethnic minorities or are underserved due to sexual orientation or gender identity.

— $75 million to study maternal health for pregnant and postpartum minority individuals.

And on and on and on.

The very first item in Title II of the bill, titled “ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION,” is a program to distribute more than $100 million in grants to address “low diversity within the teacher and school leader workforce.” To be eligible for a grant, the recipient must have a plan “to increase the diversity of qualified individuals entering into the teacher, principal, or other school leader workforce.”

Similarly, the first provision of BBB’s “ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT” section is: “Minority Business Development Agency.”

But wait — here’s a plot twist! This part also includes something for rural America! (So Democrats have heard of Appalachia.) Twenty-one percent of the country is rural. Twenty-four percent is non-white. Guess how the money is divvied up?

One billion dollars for minorities and $200 million for “rural business centers.”
 
I'm still waiting on all this equality they have been talking about.

If we're going to be equals doesn't that mean no one gets special treatment based on their skin color and that intelligence, merit and ambition of individuals is instead what gets them ahead?

I don't see anything equal or fair in there at all.
 
Indeependent
Which we tax payers will be paying for. As I said. Its one lousy bill that should never have been passed. I wonder where these idiots think they will get the money to pay for all this charity?? What a pack of imbeciles
 

Forum List

Back
Top