Modbert Daydream Believer Sep 2, 2008 33,178 3,055 48 Dec 4, 2010 #21 I haven't yet played Civ, still spend a lot of free time on Hearts of Iron 2 and 3 respectively.
Baruch Menachem ' Sep 12, 2008 14,201 3,567 185 Dec 4, 2010 Thread starter #22 Civ iv offered multiplayer. Civ V is big on multiplayer. Don't think I am going to go that route. But it is an option I just can't help but think multiplayer would be horribly slow.
Civ iv offered multiplayer. Civ V is big on multiplayer. Don't think I am going to go that route. But it is an option I just can't help but think multiplayer would be horribly slow.
Big Fitz User Quit ***** Nov 23, 2009 16,917 2,522 48 Dec 4, 2010 #23 Multiplayer? Ick. I hate multiplayer.
Cuyo Training a Guineapig army Feb 17, 2010 5,681 992 98 Denver, PA Dec 4, 2010 #24 Big Fitz said: Multiplayer? Ick. I hate multiplayer. Click to expand... How come? Is it any different than single player? I just pictured it as same, but one of other civs is the other guy. Always thought it would be interesting if you didn't know which one, either.
Big Fitz said: Multiplayer? Ick. I hate multiplayer. Click to expand... How come? Is it any different than single player? I just pictured it as same, but one of other civs is the other guy. Always thought it would be interesting if you didn't know which one, either.