Gunny
Gold Member
Not everything is worth responding to, so I'll just pick and choose:
Well, you got one right at least. Think I'll check your IP out and see if you post as Larkinn on your off time. Same, bs game of twisted semantics and dishonest, out of contex literalism. You have no argument on merit, so you instead want to play games.
I haven't called your beliefs anything other than what they are. You don't care about fair. You only care about whatever YOUR particular definition of equal is. We, as in human beings, are NOT absolute equals, nor should our pay reflect such.
You most assuredly ARE for an artifical income level if you advocate paying persons qualified to perform menial tasks at a higher rate than what the job sector values that skill at.
Nor did I say you have to work a 12 hour day. You don't have to work at all. Sit home, collect welfare/unemployment and suck off my tax dollars. Others do, you may as well too. My point is if working 12 hours a day is a means to an end you have a choice as to wether or not that end is worth those means.
Maybe the difference is that I have been too busy doing whatever I needed to do to get where I wanted to be to bitch about the way things are, knowing it isn't going to change a thing. But you take a stand on your unrealistic, utopian beliefs. See how much food it puts on your plate.