Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes and to cut the shit even further, Democrats want to inflict as much pain as possible on the American populace to gain political power.Let's cut the shit. The problem that liberalism has with hydroxychloroquine is that President Trump endorsed it. In other countries, they use it all the time. World leaders like President Bukele endorse it too. Once Trump leaves, the hate for HCQ will disappear.
Of all the people who have died, I am certain some of these poor souls was on Plaqunil....ie the Trump miracle Hydro drug.....I take it for Lupus, for RA, as I'm certain a lot of these elderly people who died could have been on...this drug does not save you from the virus.The Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine
21 Aug 2020~~ By Jim Talent
The Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine | National Review
The same medical community which is telling us that HCQ is dangerous, may soon be telling us that a vaccine developed in record time is completely safe.www.nationalreview.com
I want to make sure NR readers don’t miss this essay from Norman Doidge. It’s the best thing I’ve read on hydroxychloroquine. But beware: The piece is long and fascinating. Once you start reading, you won’t be able to stop, and it takes a good half hour to finish.
Doidge tells the tale of hydroxychloroquine, or HCQ as he calls it, as if the drug were a character in a story. His main point is that HCQ hasn’t received fair treatment in many quarters, including, unfortunately, some of the health experts advising the government of the United States. The main reasons are the intrusion of politics into medicine, the pitfalls and limitations of big data in medical science, and the over-reliance of many experts on random controlled testing to the exclusion of other kinds of evidence.
Doidge manages to make even a discussion of research methodology interesting. Here is a sample:
Patients are not “several data points.” There are multiple good reasons that the medical curriculum and major journals and texts publish RCTs, observational studies, case histories, and other designs, and why most physicians with experience will use what I would call the “all-available-evidence” approach and take, as appropriate, what they can learn from different kinds of studies, and of course everything they know about their own patient in front of them, to decide on a treatment. That is what personalized medicine is about. RCT fundamentalists — who believe only in their randomized data and essentially argue for throwing away everything else — pose as people simply expressing the conventional view: All you need is one tool. But in practice, they are way outside it. When the teacher tells you to quit paying so much attention to the fullness of your experience, pay more attention to why he might be saying so.We now have studies that show one of the weaknesses of RCTs (random controlled testing) is that in the quest to eliminate confounding factors, they end up, in a majority of cases, excluding patients who are typical of those in the population. The RCT evangelist focuses only on the RCT strengths, and forgets their weaknesses. A typical RCT describes several data points about hundreds of patients. It can be helpful in determining what treatment might work for most people in a large population. A typical case history describes perhaps hundreds of data points about a single patient. Its focus might be on what treatment might work best for this patient. Sometimes we need all that information about a patient, to choose a proper treatment, because individual patients differ, often in decisive ways.
[Snip]
This outstanding article reinforced an opinion I had already reached. I think HCQ has therapeutic benefits in treating COVID-19; I’m confident that, used with proper medical oversight, it’s harmless.
View attachment 378200
Doctor Stupid, please drink your Trump bleach and go to effin bedLiberalism has also gone apeshit over Trump's oleandrin against C-19, which is even more fascinatingly forward-thinking, because it is anti-cancer as well.
Of all the people who have died, I am certain some of these poor souls was on Plaqunil....ie the Trump miracle Hydro drug.....I take it for Lupus, for RA, as I'm certain a lot of these elderly people who died could have been on...this drug does not save you from the virus.The Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine
21 Aug 2020~~ By Jim TalentThe Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine | National Review
The same medical community which is telling us that HCQ is dangerous, may soon be telling us that a vaccine developed in record time is completely safe.
I want to make sure NR readers don’t miss this essay from Norman Doidge. It’s the best thing I’ve read on hydroxychloroquine. But beware: The piece is long and fascinating. Once you start reading, you won’t be able to stop, and it takes a good half hour to finish.
Doidge tells the tale of hydroxychloroquine, or HCQ as he calls it, as if the drug were a character in a story. His main point is that HCQ hasn’t received fair treatment in many quarters, including, unfortunately, some of the health experts advising the government of the United States. The main reasons are the intrusion of politics into medicine, the pitfalls and limitations of big data in medical science, and the over-reliance of many experts on random controlled testing to the exclusion of other kinds of evidence.
Doidge manages to make even a discussion of research methodology interesting. Here is a sample:
Patients are not “several data points.” There are multiple good reasons that the medical curriculum and major journals and texts publish RCTs, observational studies, case histories, and other designs, and why most physicians with experience will use what I would call the “all-available-evidence” approach and take, as appropriate, what they can learn from different kinds of studies, and of course everything they know about their own patient in front of them, to decide on a treatment. That is what personalized medicine is about. RCT fundamentalists — who believe only in their randomized data and essentially argue for throwing away everything else — pose as people simply expressing the conventional view: All you need is one tool. But in practice, they are way outside it. When the teacher tells you to quit paying so much attention to the fullness of your experience, pay more attention to why he might be saying so.We now have studies that show one of the weaknesses of RCTs (random controlled testing) is that in the quest to eliminate confounding factors, they end up, in a majority of cases, excluding patients who are typical of those in the population. The RCT evangelist focuses only on the RCT strengths, and forgets their weaknesses. A typical RCT describes several data points about hundreds of patients. It can be helpful in determining what treatment might work for most people in a large population. A typical case history describes perhaps hundreds of data points about a single patient. Its focus might be on what treatment might work best for this patient. Sometimes we need all that information about a patient, to choose a proper treatment, because individual patients differ, often in decisive ways.
[Snip]
This outstanding article reinforced an opinion I had already reached. I think HCQ has therapeutic benefits in treating COVID-19; I’m confident that, used with proper medical oversight, it’s harmless.
View attachment 378200
Of all the people who have died, I am certain some of these poor souls was on Plaqunil....ie the Trump miracle Hydro drug.....I take it for Lupus, for RA, as I'm certain a lot of these elderly people who died could have been on...this drug does not save you from the virus.The Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine
21 Aug 2020~~ By Jim TalentThe Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine | National Review
The same medical community which is telling us that HCQ is dangerous, may soon be telling us that a vaccine developed in record time is completely safe.
I want to make sure NR readers don’t miss this essay from Norman Doidge. It’s the best thing I’ve read on hydroxychloroquine. But beware: The piece is long and fascinating. Once you start reading, you won’t be able to stop, and it takes a good half hour to finish.
Doidge tells the tale of hydroxychloroquine, or HCQ as he calls it, as if the drug were a character in a story. His main point is that HCQ hasn’t received fair treatment in many quarters, including, unfortunately, some of the health experts advising the government of the United States. The main reasons are the intrusion of politics into medicine, the pitfalls and limitations of big data in medical science, and the over-reliance of many experts on random controlled testing to the exclusion of other kinds of evidence.
Doidge manages to make even a discussion of research methodology interesting. Here is a sample:
Patients are not “several data points.” There are multiple good reasons that the medical curriculum and major journals and texts publish RCTs, observational studies, case histories, and other designs, and why most physicians with experience will use what I would call the “all-available-evidence” approach and take, as appropriate, what they can learn from different kinds of studies, and of course everything they know about their own patient in front of them, to decide on a treatment. That is what personalized medicine is about. RCT fundamentalists — who believe only in their randomized data and essentially argue for throwing away everything else — pose as people simply expressing the conventional view: All you need is one tool. But in practice, they are way outside it. When the teacher tells you to quit paying so much attention to the fullness of your experience, pay more attention to why he might be saying so.We now have studies that show one of the weaknesses of RCTs (random controlled testing) is that in the quest to eliminate confounding factors, they end up, in a majority of cases, excluding patients who are typical of those in the population. The RCT evangelist focuses only on the RCT strengths, and forgets their weaknesses. A typical RCT describes several data points about hundreds of patients. It can be helpful in determining what treatment might work for most people in a large population. A typical case history describes perhaps hundreds of data points about a single patient. Its focus might be on what treatment might work best for this patient. Sometimes we need all that information about a patient, to choose a proper treatment, because individual patients differ, often in decisive ways.
[Snip]
This outstanding article reinforced an opinion I had already reached. I think HCQ has therapeutic benefits in treating COVID-19; I’m confident that, used with proper medical oversight, it’s harmless.
View attachment 378200
www.frontpagemag.com
What in the world are you saying?Yes and to cut the shit even further, Democrats want to inflict as much pain as possible on the American populace to gain political power.Let's cut the shit. The problem that liberalism has with hydroxychloroquine is that President Trump endorsed it. In other countries, they use it all the time. World leaders like President Bukele endorse it too. Once Trump leaves, the hate for HCQ will disappear.
If anyone needs more proof in the matter, Why is Joey B saying if elected he would close down the U.S....
'I would shut it down': Biden says if scientists recommended, he would lock down country to curb COVID-19
“We cannot get the country moving until we control the virus," Biden told ABC News. "I would shut it down. I would listen to the scientists."www.usatoday.com
Hydroxychloroquine Follies
How a corrupt elite disregards Americans' health for political and financial advantage.
28 Aug 2020 ~~ By Joseph HippolitoHydroxychloroquine Follies | Frontpage Mag
Andrew Wilkow, a host on Sirius XM's “Patriot” channel, routinely makes a perceptive observation about the conflict between President Donald Trump and the
Andrew Wilcow, a host on Sirius XM's “Patriot” channel, routinely makes a perceptive observation about the conflict between President Donald Trump and the Democratic Party.
Trump could cure cancer, Wilcow said, and the Democrats would defend the rights of tumors.
Wilkow's observation is not so absurd when applied to the Covid-19 pandemic.
A coalition of "progressives," the Democratic Party, government bureaucrats and media refuses to promote or make an effective, inexpensive treatment available. Why? So they can politically exploit the pandemic for as long as possible and get the Presidential ticket of former Vice President Joe Biden and California Sen. Kamala Harris elected.
New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman inadvertently revealed that strategy when CNN's Wolf Blitzer interviewed him Aug. 3. Blitzer began by expressing hopelessness about the pandemic.
"I mean, it's a sad situation what's going on right now, and I don't see any end in sight," Blitzer said. "Hopefully there will be a therapeutic that comes out that can prevent people from getting really sick and dying. Hopefully, there will be a vaccine at some point that will ease this. But right now, it doesn't seem to have any end in sight. Do you see an end in sight right now?"
Friedman issued a surprising response.
"Oh, I do see an end in sight," Friedman said. "It's in November, Wolf. And let me be very clear about this. Wolf, I will walk, I will crawl, I will slither, I will bike, I will hike, but I will be going to the polls to vote for Joe Biden. Because until and unless we replace this president and this administration, we're going to be having this same conversation every day, all right?"
Friedman continued:
"That is what this is about. This is about power. It's about removing this man who has no business being president, who is incapable of navigating us out of this crisis. And there is only one thing to do, and that is vote for Joe Biden."As FrontPage Magazine exposed in "Leftist Masquerade" and "Socialist Distancing," the Democrats promote their agenda by ignoring scientific studies that warn against continuous mask-wearing and social distancing. So which effective, inexpensive treatment for Covid-19 is being suppressed?
Hydroxychloroquine, which the Food and Drug Administration approved in 1955. As a result, doctors can prescribe hydroxychloroquine at their discretion. The FDA allows doctors to so to discover new remedies for new conditions.
[Snip]
In his farewell address before leaving the White House -- the same one in which he warned against the "military-industrial complex" -- President Dwight Eisenhower also warned against the budding relationship between government and science:
"...research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. ... the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity."The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."Include the complicity of reporters, social media and left-wing activists, and you have our current conundrum. Only not just public policy is held captive. So are Americans' very lives.
The Covid-19 pandemic makes Eisenhower's admonitions prophetic.
Comment:
I believe the corrupt politicization for something as forthright as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will be exposed by the Trump administration after the second Trump term. This casting the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats for the part they've played through our nation’s history: The enemies of the Republic.
During this last election cycle, Dems have sunk as lower than anytime before in their history. They've become the Trojan Horse of Communism.
It is highly frustrating to see how the FDA and other regulatory organizations can and are used to politically block real public healthcare solutions, when they are supposed to be counter to the Deep State establishment and political interests.
One wonders if a cure for cancer was discovered if the vast embedded political interests would block it as they have supposedly done with the treatment of Chinese Covid-19.
Countries like the UK, Turkey, France, Brazil, India and others have begun to use the HCQ Cocktail extensively and saved thousands of patients from death.
You go to war with what you've got at the time, if you are able to develop better bullets along the way then by all means use them. But in the meantime you use what you've got...
HCQ is proven a safe drug and the combination with Zinc and Erythromycin has proven effective. It should be used to treat patients until something better or more effective.
Of all the people who have died, I am certain some of these poor souls was on Plaqunil....ie the Trump miracle Hydro drug.....I take it for Lupus, for RA, as I'm certain a lot of these elderly people who died could have been on...this drug does not save you from the virus.The Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine
21 Aug 2020~~ By Jim TalentThe Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine | National Review
The same medical community which is telling us that HCQ is dangerous, may soon be telling us that a vaccine developed in record time is completely safe.
I want to make sure NR readers don’t miss this essay from Norman Doidge. It’s the best thing I’ve read on hydroxychloroquine. But beware: The piece is long and fascinating. Once you start reading, you won’t be able to stop, and it takes a good half hour to finish.
Doidge tells the tale of hydroxychloroquine, or HCQ as he calls it, as if the drug were a character in a story. His main point is that HCQ hasn’t received fair treatment in many quarters, including, unfortunately, some of the health experts advising the government of the United States. The main reasons are the intrusion of politics into medicine, the pitfalls and limitations of big data in medical science, and the over-reliance of many experts on random controlled testing to the exclusion of other kinds of evidence.
Doidge manages to make even a discussion of research methodology interesting. Here is a sample:
Patients are not “several data points.” There are multiple good reasons that the medical curriculum and major journals and texts publish RCTs, observational studies, case histories, and other designs, and why most physicians with experience will use what I would call the “all-available-evidence” approach and take, as appropriate, what they can learn from different kinds of studies, and of course everything they know about their own patient in front of them, to decide on a treatment. That is what personalized medicine is about. RCT fundamentalists — who believe only in their randomized data and essentially argue for throwing away everything else — pose as people simply expressing the conventional view: All you need is one tool. But in practice, they are way outside it. When the teacher tells you to quit paying so much attention to the fullness of your experience, pay more attention to why he might be saying so.We now have studies that show one of the weaknesses of RCTs (random controlled testing) is that in the quest to eliminate confounding factors, they end up, in a majority of cases, excluding patients who are typical of those in the population. The RCT evangelist focuses only on the RCT strengths, and forgets their weaknesses. A typical RCT describes several data points about hundreds of patients. It can be helpful in determining what treatment might work for most people in a large population. A typical case history describes perhaps hundreds of data points about a single patient. Its focus might be on what treatment might work best for this patient. Sometimes we need all that information about a patient, to choose a proper treatment, because individual patients differ, often in decisive ways.
[Snip]
This outstanding article reinforced an opinion I had already reached. I think HCQ has therapeutic benefits in treating COVID-19; I’m confident that, used with proper medical oversight, it’s harmless.
View attachment 378200
So have you been out and exposed yourself knowingly or unknowingly to Chinese Covid-19? Has anyone you have had contact with contracted the virus?
How do you know you haven't been protected by the prophylactic use of HCQ/Plaquenil?
World leaders like President Nayib Bukele of the Tremendous Republic of El Salvador, report that they take HCQ for prevention. So far, Señor Bukele is still alive and well , proving the efficacy of the medicine.Of all the people who have died, I am certain some of these poor souls was on Plaqunil....ie the Trump miracle Hydro drug.....I take it for Lupus, for RA, as I'm certain a lot of these elderly people who died could have been on...this drug does not save you from the virus.The Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine
21 Aug 2020~~ By Jim TalentThe Long, Sad Saga of Hydroxychloroquine | National Review
The same medical community which is telling us that HCQ is dangerous, may soon be telling us that a vaccine developed in record time is completely safe.
I want to make sure NR readers don’t miss this essay from Norman Doidge. It’s the best thing I’ve read on hydroxychloroquine. But beware: The piece is long and fascinating. Once you start reading, you won’t be able to stop, and it takes a good half hour to finish.
Doidge tells the tale of hydroxychloroquine, or HCQ as he calls it, as if the drug were a character in a story. His main point is that HCQ hasn’t received fair treatment in many quarters, including, unfortunately, some of the health experts advising the government of the United States. The main reasons are the intrusion of politics into medicine, the pitfalls and limitations of big data in medical science, and the over-reliance of many experts on random controlled testing to the exclusion of other kinds of evidence.
Doidge manages to make even a discussion of research methodology interesting. Here is a sample:
Patients are not “several data points.” There are multiple good reasons that the medical curriculum and major journals and texts publish RCTs, observational studies, case histories, and other designs, and why most physicians with experience will use what I would call the “all-available-evidence” approach and take, as appropriate, what they can learn from different kinds of studies, and of course everything they know about their own patient in front of them, to decide on a treatment. That is what personalized medicine is about. RCT fundamentalists — who believe only in their randomized data and essentially argue for throwing away everything else — pose as people simply expressing the conventional view: All you need is one tool. But in practice, they are way outside it. When the teacher tells you to quit paying so much attention to the fullness of your experience, pay more attention to why he might be saying so.We now have studies that show one of the weaknesses of RCTs (random controlled testing) is that in the quest to eliminate confounding factors, they end up, in a majority of cases, excluding patients who are typical of those in the population. The RCT evangelist focuses only on the RCT strengths, and forgets their weaknesses. A typical RCT describes several data points about hundreds of patients. It can be helpful in determining what treatment might work for most people in a large population. A typical case history describes perhaps hundreds of data points about a single patient. Its focus might be on what treatment might work best for this patient. Sometimes we need all that information about a patient, to choose a proper treatment, because individual patients differ, often in decisive ways.
[Snip]
This outstanding article reinforced an opinion I had already reached. I think HCQ has therapeutic benefits in treating COVID-19; I’m confident that, used with proper medical oversight, it’s harmless.
View attachment 378200
So have you been out and exposed yourself knowingly or unknowingly to Chinese Covid-19? Has anyone you have had contact with contracted the virus?
How do you know you haven't been protected by the prophylactic use of HCQ/Plaquenil?
What in the world are you talking about Dude?
Hospitals uses HCQ and combination to treat Covid 19 heavily in all hospitals. Triggered is 100% accurate. Hospitals deaths of Covid 19 was treated with HCQ but it failed in some cases. Pay attention to scientist and experts. Do not listen to an unknown worthless media or an ignorant leader.
Hydroxychloroquine Follies
How a corrupt elite disregards Americans' health for political and financial advantage.
28 Aug 2020 ~~ By Joseph HippolitoHydroxychloroquine Follies | Frontpage Mag
Andrew Wilkow, a host on Sirius XM's “Patriot” channel, routinely makes a perceptive observation about the conflict between President Donald Trump and the
Andrew Wilcow, a host on Sirius XM's “Patriot” channel, routinely makes a perceptive observation about the conflict between President Donald Trump and the Democratic Party.
Trump could cure cancer, Wilcow said, and the Democrats would defend the rights of tumors.
Wilkow's observation is not so absurd when applied to the Covid-19 pandemic.
A coalition of "progressives," the Democratic Party, government bureaucrats and media refuses to promote or make an effective, inexpensive treatment available. Why? So they can politically exploit the pandemic for as long as possible and get the Presidential ticket of former Vice President Joe Biden and California Sen. Kamala Harris elected.
New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman inadvertently revealed that strategy when CNN's Wolf Blitzer interviewed him Aug. 3. Blitzer began by expressing hopelessness about the pandemic.
"I mean, it's a sad situation what's going on right now, and I don't see any end in sight," Blitzer said. "Hopefully there will be a therapeutic that comes out that can prevent people from getting really sick and dying. Hopefully, there will be a vaccine at some point that will ease this. But right now, it doesn't seem to have any end in sight. Do you see an end in sight right now?"
Friedman issued a surprising response.
"Oh, I do see an end in sight," Friedman said. "It's in November, Wolf. And let me be very clear about this. Wolf, I will walk, I will crawl, I will slither, I will bike, I will hike, but I will be going to the polls to vote for Joe Biden. Because until and unless we replace this president and this administration, we're going to be having this same conversation every day, all right?"
Friedman continued:
"That is what this is about. This is about power. It's about removing this man who has no business being president, who is incapable of navigating us out of this crisis. And there is only one thing to do, and that is vote for Joe Biden."As FrontPage Magazine exposed in "Leftist Masquerade" and "Socialist Distancing," the Democrats promote their agenda by ignoring scientific studies that warn against continuous mask-wearing and social distancing. So which effective, inexpensive treatment for Covid-19 is being suppressed?
Hydroxychloroquine, which the Food and Drug Administration approved in 1955. As a result, doctors can prescribe hydroxychloroquine at their discretion. The FDA allows doctors to so to discover new remedies for new conditions.
[Snip]
In his farewell address before leaving the White House -- the same one in which he warned against the "military-industrial complex" -- President Dwight Eisenhower also warned against the budding relationship between government and science:
"...research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. ... the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity."The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite."Include the complicity of reporters, social media and left-wing activists, and you have our current conundrum. Only not just public policy is held captive. So are Americans' very lives.
The Covid-19 pandemic makes Eisenhower's admonitions prophetic.
Comment:
I believe the corrupt politicization for something as forthright as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) will be exposed by the Trump administration after the second Trump term. This casting the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats for the part they've played through our nation’s history: The enemies of the Republic.
During this last election cycle, Dems have sunk as lower than anytime before in their history. They've become the Trojan Horse of Communism.
It is highly frustrating to see how the FDA and other regulatory organizations can and are used to politically block real public healthcare solutions, when they are supposed to be counter to the Deep State establishment and political interests.
One wonders if a cure for cancer was discovered if the vast embedded political interests would block it as they have supposedly done with the treatment of Chinese Covid-19.
Countries like the UK, Turkey, France, Brazil, India and others have begun to use the HCQ Cocktail extensively and saved thousands of patients from death.
You go to war with what you've got at the time, if you are able to develop better bullets along the way then by all means use them. But in the meantime you use what you've got...
HCQ is proven a safe drug and the combination with Zinc and Erythromycin has proven effective. It should be used to treat patients until something better or more effective.
From Frontpage? Is that supposed to be credible? A 100% extreme bias, poor sourcing, conspiracies BULLSHIT.
Several HCQ trials have negative results by well known studies.
What in the world are you talking about Dude? They use HCQ and other combinations in hospitals today and around the world because it’s cheap to treat Covid 19. But it’s not really that effective that is why deaths are still climbing up.
PAY ATTENTION..... This ignorant president is promoting HCQ as a Preventative Maintenance . That’s the difference. Not a single hospitals or health agencies or studies promoting stupidity HCQ as PM.
"some cases?" How many? How many were successful? Let's see the stats. Also lets see the raw data from which you derived the stats and the method of data collection.Hospitals uses HCQ and combination to treat Covid 19 heavily in all hospitals. Triggered is 100% accurate. Hospitals deaths of Covid 19 was treated with HCQ but it failed in some cases. Pay attention to scientist and experts. Do not listen to an unknown worthless media or an ignorant leader.
"some cases?" How many? How many were successful? Let's see the stats.Hospitals uses HCQ and combination to treat Covid 19 heavily in all hospitals. Triggered is 100% accurate. Hospitals deaths of Covid 19 was treated with HCQ but it failed in some cases. Pay attention to scientist and experts. Do not listen to an unknown worthless media or an ignorant leader.
c19study.com
If this becomes available in the states Bill Gates and the rest of the elite will be angry as hell thst there is a cure.lol we are the most corrupt government in the world,you go to many other countries and this is available over the counter.Some positive news amidst all the gray clouds
Topline: President Trump said in a Thursday press briefing that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, drugs used to treat malaria and severe arthritis, were approved by the Food and Drug Administration to test as a COVID-19 coronavirus treatment, as the number of cases nationwide continues to increase.
Updated: Trump Says FDA Approved Anti-Malaria Drug Chloroquine To Test As Coronavirus Treatment
- The drugs will be used in a clinical trial, according to FDA commissioner Dr. Stephen Hahn, who spoke during the press briefing.
- Trump also said that other antiviral medications will be fast-tracked for FDA approval.
I think you just buried charwin95.....~~~~~~
HCQ for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 267 studies
HCQ for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 267 studies
You read correctly,that is true,it cures EvERYONE.It cured 40 out of 40 of the first batch or test subjects according to what I read this morning.
Wow you sure are babbling,it was the democrats that are responsible for all that Einstein.lolWhat in the world are you saying?Yes and to cut the shit even further, Democrats want to inflict as much pain as possible on the American populace to gain political power.Let's cut the shit. The problem that liberalism has with hydroxychloroquine is that President Trump endorsed it. In other countries, they use it all the time. World leaders like President Bukele endorse it too. Once Trump leaves, the hate for HCQ will disappear.
If anyone needs more proof in the matter, Why is Joey B saying if elected he would close down the U.S....
'I would shut it down': Biden says if scientists recommended, he would lock down country to curb COVID-19
“We cannot get the country moving until we control the virus," Biden told ABC News. "I would shut it down. I would listen to the scientists."www.usatoday.com
Trump already inflicted damages to millions and millions of Americans lives and life. Over 5 millions infected and counting and 180,000+ deaths and counting. Americans are scared, financially sufferings, unemployment, businesses closures that will never come back.
Because of Trump incompetence. Look at him before and today.
Does it look like he gives a shit? Is he equip to handle these crisis? Hell NO. Does he listen to scientist and experts? HELL NO.
But he listened to a lunatic doctor, ignorantly promote HCQ, promote conspiracies and other purely hogwash.
Biden is 100% accurate. He said he would listen to science and experts. If we don’t control this pandemic we can never get there to normal.
DONT FORGET. we could have a vaccine for Covid 19 but we can never eliminate the Covid 19. Just like the vaccine for ordinary flu it never left us after years of vaccines availability.
Indeed,he sure did,he is the one that needs to listens to scientists and doctors,grampa nailed it saying forty out of forty that were treated recovered,it works for EVERYONE,one doctor is on record that he treated several dozens of patients and ALL recovered,you just got to go to bitchute and you’ll find those videos of doctors saying that.I think you just buried charwin95.....~~~~~~
HCQ for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 267 studies
HCQ for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 267 studies
