jc456,Yep, they follow this rule;jc456,I don't agree with you. Accept we don't. All of the graphs you posted are using manufactured data. Understand?Kosh,Oh needed to add this one:
Rather than changes in earth's CO2 causing temperature to change, scientists have actually found that changes in earth's temperatures always precedes changes in CO2 by 400 to a 1000 years -- just the opposite of what global warming proponents would have us believe.
Temperature doesn't always precede CO2. As the graph shows. And when you throw in the position of contenents and many other factors, that too throws a monkey wrench into your ideas.View attachment 32901
View attachment 32901 View attachment 32901
Sorry about the duplication.
Provide the unaltered data from the stations.
Yeah. The graphs is showed were manufactured. Manufactured from reliable scientific investigation.
form Wikipedia:
"In statistics and applications of statistics, normalization can have a range of meanings.[1] In the simplest cases, normalization of ratings means adjusting values measured on different scales to a notionally common scale, often prior to averaging. In more complicated cases, normalization may refer to more sophisticated adjustments where the intention is to bring the entire probability distributions of adjusted values into alignment"
Statistics has little or nothing to do with it. What matters are the measurements.
Bullshit. Mann et al are using stats to generate their little fantasies. Grow up kid. You're out of your depth and don't even understand the base lies they are telling you. When real statisticians look over Mann et al's work they invariably rip it to shreds within hours. In other words your precious high priests are terrible at math.