Huffington Post deletes articles, terminates writer for questioning Hillary’s health?



This guy apparently did not believe us about the main stream media? Well, now he knows. Same with Doctor Drew Pinsky.

Welcome, to the machine.


Doesn't Huffpo have the right to control its own editorial content?


Doesn't a bakery have a right to sell a cake to whoever it wants?

Even so, don't we have a right to acknowledge they are homophobes (or in this case anti-free speech).



It's amazing how liberals are suddenly so pro freedom. Were this any other case they would be crying murder. Just shows they have no principles.
 


This guy apparently did not believe us about the main stream media? Well, now he knows. Same with Doctor Drew Pinsky.

Welcome, to the machine.


Doesn't Huffpo have the right to control its own editorial content?


Doesn't a bakery have a right to sell a cake to whoever it wants?

Even so, don't we have a right to acknowledge they are homophobes (or in this case anti-free speech).



It's amazing how liberals are suddenly so pro freedom. Were this any other case they would be crying murder. Just shows they have no principles.


So your position is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane?
 
Journalists - TRUE journalists - are supposed to question things, not be shills for a candidate...like the liberal media has become.

All this censorship and hiding Hillary's health records just prove something serious is going on with her health. They're just making things worse by highlighting it THIS way.

...libs are going to close their eyes and bote for a dain bramaged candidate. :p

You have no clue what journalists are supposed to do or not do.
 
It's definitely desperation time for the Trumpistas. They care as much about David Seaman as they did about Bernie Sanders. It's just another cynical attempt to save a dying campaign.
Actually it is more of an OBSERVATION of just how CORRUPT the political society - politicians and media - have become and how far they will go to protect their 'chosen ones'.

This was not just a 'firing' of an individual, it is CENSORSHIP, an attempt to CONTROL the populace through the CONTROL of news and information, as well as a WARNING to any other journalist who may think about writing anything negative about Hillary.

Making such an observation has in no way any chance of 'saving' anyone's campaign.
 
Journalists - TRUE journalists - are supposed to question things, not be shills for a candidate...like the liberal media has become.

All this censorship and hiding Hillary's health records just prove something serious is going on with her health. They're just making things worse by highlighting it THIS way.

...libs are going to close their eyes and bote for a dain bramaged candidate. :p

You have no clue what journalists are supposed to do or not do.
Why should anyone believe a liar like you?! :p
 


This guy apparently did not believe us about the main stream media? Well, now he knows. Same with Doctor Drew Pinsky.

Welcome, to the machine.


Doesn't Huffpo have the right to control its own editorial content?


Doesn't a bakery have a right to sell a cake to whoever it wants?

Even so, don't we have a right to acknowledge they are homophobes (or in this case anti-free speech).



It's amazing how liberals are suddenly so pro freedom. Were this any other case they would be crying murder. Just shows they have no principles.


So your position is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane?


No, but a magazine that claims to fair and balanced should not have fired him and deleted the article. It screams of bias, and you know it.

But of course, they are biased, that's not journalism, and the magazine is not a news magazine. Rather it's all liberal propaganda...

And we are tired of that propaganda will point it out, and vote accordingly. You are the one being insane, you fascist.
 


This guy apparently did not believe us about the main stream media? Well, now he knows. Same with Doctor Drew Pinsky.

Welcome, to the machine.


Doesn't Huffpo have the right to control its own editorial content?


Doesn't a bakery have a right to sell a cake to whoever it wants?

Even so, don't we have a right to acknowledge they are homophobes (or in this case anti-free speech).



It's amazing how liberals are suddenly so pro freedom. Were this any other case they would be crying murder. Just shows they have no principles.


So your position is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane?


No, but a magazine that claims to fair and balanced should not have fired him and deleted the article.

actually, yes, they should have.

there is no reason to believe that clinton is not healthy. not all opinions or views are valid and the huffington post showed they are not willing to sully their reputation by allowing any crackpot theory space on their site.
 
It's definitely desperation time for the Trumpistas. They care as much about David Seaman as they did about Bernie Sanders. It's just another cynical attempt to save a dying campaign.
Where did I say I care about the asshole? I did say he should have been more aware, if he listened to conservatives like me.

You are a reprehensible liar. A fucking walking parrot.
 


This guy apparently did not believe us about the main stream media? Well, now he knows. Same with Doctor Drew Pinsky.

Welcome, to the machine.


Doesn't Huffpo have the right to control its own editorial content?


Doesn't a bakery have a right to sell a cake to whoever it wants?

Even so, don't we have a right to acknowledge they are homophobes (or in this case anti-free speech).



It's amazing how liberals are suddenly so pro freedom. Were this any other case they would be crying murder. Just shows they have no principles.


So your position is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane?


No, but a magazine that claims to fair and balanced should not have fired him and deleted the article.

actually, yes, they should have.

there is no reason to believe that clinton is not healthy. not all opinions or views are valid and the huffington post showed they are not willing to sully their reputation by allowing any crackpot theory space on their site.



Yeah, that's exactly what Dr. Drew said too.

But you will believe anything she says. There is nothing wrong with QUESTIONING anything, you moron.

Crackpot theory? Wasn't Hillary's theory that alt-right and Putin are somehow behind the Benghazi events? Oh... but you won't care about her crackpot theories.

19lu0p.jpg
 
Doesn't Huffpo have the right to control its own editorial content?

Doesn't a bakery have a right to sell a cake to whoever it wants?

Even so, don't we have a right to acknowledge they are homophobes (or in this case anti-free speech).



It's amazing how liberals are suddenly so pro freedom. Were this any other case they would be crying murder. Just shows they have no principles.

So your position is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane?

No, but a magazine that claims to fair and balanced should not have fired him and deleted the article.
actually, yes, they should have.

there is no reason to believe that clinton is not healthy. not all opinions or views are valid and the huffington post showed they are not willing to sully their reputation by allowing any crackpot theory space on their site.


Yeah, that's exactly what Dr. Drew said too.

But you will believe anything she says. There is nothing wrong with QUESTIONING anything, you moron.

Crackpot theory? Wasn't Hillary's theory that alt-right and Putin are somehow behind the Benghazi events? Oh... but you won't care about her crackpot theories.

19lu0p.jpg
clearly you aren't willing to have an adult conversation and will spread whatever lie pops into your head.

when you decide you can be mature enough to discuss things reasonably, let me know.
 
Doesn't a bakery have a right to sell a cake to whoever it wants?

Even so, don't we have a right to acknowledge they are homophobes (or in this case anti-free speech).



It's amazing how liberals are suddenly so pro freedom. Were this any other case they would be crying murder. Just shows they have no principles.

So your position is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane?

No, but a magazine that claims to fair and balanced should not have fired him and deleted the article.
actually, yes, they should have.

there is no reason to believe that clinton is not healthy. not all opinions or views are valid and the huffington post showed they are not willing to sully their reputation by allowing any crackpot theory space on their site.


Yeah, that's exactly what Dr. Drew said too.

But you will believe anything she says. There is nothing wrong with QUESTIONING anything, you moron.

Crackpot theory? Wasn't Hillary's theory that alt-right and Putin are somehow behind the Benghazi events? Oh... but you won't care about her crackpot theories.

19lu0p.jpg
clearly you aren't willing to have an adult conversation and will spread whatever lie pops into your head.

when you decide you can be mature enough to discuss things reasonably, let me know.

You have made clear that you are not mature enough to even have the capability of having mature discussion. Your voting choice reflects that, too.
 
So your position is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane?

No, but a magazine that claims to fair and balanced should not have fired him and deleted the article.
actually, yes, they should have.

there is no reason to believe that clinton is not healthy. not all opinions or views are valid and the huffington post showed they are not willing to sully their reputation by allowing any crackpot theory space on their site.


Yeah, that's exactly what Dr. Drew said too.

But you will believe anything she says. There is nothing wrong with QUESTIONING anything, you moron.

Crackpot theory? Wasn't Hillary's theory that alt-right and Putin are somehow behind the Benghazi events? Oh... but you won't care about her crackpot theories.

19lu0p.jpg
clearly you aren't willing to have an adult conversation and will spread whatever lie pops into your head.

when you decide you can be mature enough to discuss things reasonably, let me know.

You have made clear that you are not mature enough to even have the capability of having mature discussion. Your voting choice reflects that, too.
i'm going to try to speak down enough to you that you might understand.

conspiracy theorists think that the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated by our own government. should a website have to allow conspiracy theorists to post articles that lend credence to that somewhat popular but thoroughly debunked theory in order for you to claim they are not biased?
 
Journalists - TRUE journalists - are supposed to question things, not be shills for a candidate...like the liberal media has become.

All this censorship and hiding Hillary's health records just prove something serious is going on with her health. They're just making things worse by highlighting it THIS way.

...libs are going to close their eyes and bote for a dain bramaged candidate. :p

You have no clue what journalists are supposed to do or not do.
NYC, Have you apologized to that board member for calling him a liar about Hillary Clinton praising Robert Byrd yet?

The video posted showed it was you, not him, who was the liar...So have you apologized yet?
 
It's definitely desperation time for the Trumpistas. They care as much about David Seaman as they did about Bernie Sanders. It's just another cynical attempt to save a dying campaign.
Where did I say I care about the asshole? I did say he should have been more aware, if he listened to conservatives like me. You are a reprehensible liar. A fucking walking parrot.
Who said this was all about you? I said "they". The pretense, however, is very obvious. I didn't say you cared, just pretending to care.
 
sition is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane
Are you admitting that huff post isn't fairly covering the election by not publishing counter views? That's an abmission of being a DNC lapdog. Do they hold back and censor views falsely accusing Trump and his supporters as racists? Not on your chance. We gave them Freedon of the Press to be a watchdog on government. They aren't doing that, so that clause should be repealed.
 
sition is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane
Are you admitting that huff post isn't fairly covering the election by not publishing counter views? That's an abmission of being a DNC lapdog. Do they hold back and censor views falsely accusing Trump and his supporters as racists? Not on your chance. We gave them Freedon of the Press to be a watchdog on government. They aren't doing that, so that clause should be repealed.
there you have it. a 'conservative' that hates freedom.

huffington post is under no obligation to treat every conspiracy theory with respect and as if it were a valid opinion.
 
sition is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane
Are you admitting that huff post isn't fairly covering the election by not publishing counter views? That's an abmission of being a DNC lapdog. Do they hold back and censor views falsely accusing Trump and his supporters as racists? Not on your chance. We gave them Freedon of the Press to be a watchdog on government. They aren't doing that, so that clause should be repealed.

Freedom of the press protects opinion more than news publishing.
 
sition is that once someone hires a writer, they relinquish all control over what that writer can choose to have published on their site.

Are you fucking insane
Are you admitting that huff post isn't fairly covering the election by not publishing counter views? That's an abmission of being a DNC lapdog. Do they hold back and censor views falsely accusing Trump and his supporters as racists? Not on your chance. We gave them Freedon of the Press to be a watchdog on government. They aren't doing that, so that clause should be repealed.
there you have it. a 'conservative' that hates freedom.

huffington post is under no obligation to treat every conspiracy theory with respect and as if it were a valid opinion.
It's not a conspiracy theory. That video has 3 million views which deserves a mention by the press. All that coughing and spazzing out isn't normal. We can't have a dying President before she finishes her inaugural speech. If Hillary is sick, then the people have a right to know and the MSM should investigate. That's why they have FOTP to protect them.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top