How Will The U.S. Pay For War With North Korea?

BertramN

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2016
3,475
3,192
1,970
.
Various estimates place the cost of the U.S. military adventures in the Middle East since 2003 at $4 trillion to $6 trillion to date. This does not include additional costs that will be incurred in the future resulting from these wars.

Also, keep in mind, U.S. fighting during this century in the Middle East has been largely from the air. Most ground battles have been skirmishes against Islamic extremist guerrilla groups, not seasoned military troops with heavy artillery.

Leaving these few details about the Middle East wars behind for a moment, officials on both sides are predicting the war between the U.S. and North Korea to be inevitable, as Trump and Kim Jong-un keep upping the ante with their insults to each other.

So, taking into consideration the trillions-of-dollars of borrowed money the U.S. has already spent increasing unrest across the Middle East, with no end in sight, how will the U.S. pay the American defense industry for the war materials necessary to engage North Korea? (The corporate executives of these companies will expect their bonuses, and stockholders will certainly NOT be donating their dividends to the cause.)

Given the many insults Trump has aimed at our European allies, it’s doubtful any of them will pony up cash to loan the U.S. Plus, with the attention of the U.S. military split between the Middle East AND North Korea, Putin’s expansion into the Crimea will undoubtedly spread to other Eastern European nations. So, NATO members will have their hands full in Europe.

Also, China isn’t going to sit by and permit the destruction of their neighbor and ally North Korea. China has 2,183,000 active military troops to add to North Korea’s 1,190,000 active troops, to fight against the United States’ 1,347,300 military members.

Even with a best case scenario, where any sort of nuclear exchange can be avoided, and all action is limited to Eastern Asia, how long can the United States’ money and military hold out in a real war? Especially with the $1.5 trillion gift the GOP just gave to the 0.1% and Big Business? (The Social Security Trust Fund only has about $2 trillion in actual assets, the other $2 trillion in IOU,s from the federal government don’t count. This $2 trillion and eliminating all safety net programs could help, but not for very long in a real war.)

Any rational answers, anyone?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nkorea-says-us-threats-make-war-unavoidable-on-korean-peninsula-kcna/ar-BBGjXRI?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp


.
 
There is no "Russian expansion". If there was, that demilitarized zones that make up the EU would be Russian by now.
However, Trump will have a hard time creating an alliance against North Korea. Why should we Europeans support American war madness? We are not interested in North Korea being angry with us and the US would lose that war anyway.
 
.
Various estimates place the cost of the U.S. military adventures in the Middle East since 2003 at $4 trillion to $6 trillion to date. This does not include additional costs that will be incurred in the future resulting from these wars.

Also, keep in mind, U.S. fighting during this century in the Middle East has been largely from the air. Most ground battles have been skirmishes against Islamic extremist guerrilla groups, not seasoned military troops with heavy artillery.

Leaving these few details about the Middle East wars behind for a moment, officials on both sides are predicting the war between the U.S. and North Korea to be inevitable, as Trump and Kim Jong-un keep upping the ante with their insults to each other.

So, taking into consideration the trillions-of-dollars of borrowed money the U.S. has already spent increasing unrest across the Middle East, with no end in sight, how will the U.S. pay the American defense industry for the war materials necessary to engage North Korea? (The corporate executives of these companies will expect their bonuses, and stockholders will certainly NOT be donating their dividends to the cause.)

Given the many insults Trump has aimed at our European allies, it’s doubtful any of them will pony up cash to loan the U.S. Plus, with the attention of the U.S. military split between the Middle East AND North Korea, Putin’s expansion into the Crimea will undoubtedly spread to other Eastern European nations. So, NATO members will have their hands full in Europe.

Also, China isn’t going to sit by and permit the destruction of their neighbor and ally North Korea. China has 2,183,000 active military troops to add to North Korea’s 1,190,000 active troops, to fight against the United States’ 1,347,300 military members.

Even with a best case scenario, where any sort of nuclear exchange can be avoided, and all action is limited to Eastern Asia, how long can the United States’ money and military hold out in a real war? Especially with the $1.5 trillion gift the GOP just gave to the 0.1% and Big Business? (The Social Security Trust Fund only has about $2 trillion in actual assets, the other $2 trillion in IOU,s from the federal government don’t count. This $2 trillion and eliminating all safety net programs could help, but not for very long in a real war.)

Any rational answers, anyone?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nkorea-says-us-threats-make-war-unavoidable-on-korean-peninsula-kcna/ar-BBGjXRI?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp


.
Get your checkbook out. The previous 8 years we did nothing to prevent this. It could have been stopped. It wasn't, so get your checkbook out.
 
.
Various estimates place the cost of the U.S. military adventures in the Middle East since 2003 at $4 trillion to $6 trillion to date. This does not include additional costs that will be incurred in the future resulting from these wars.

Also, keep in mind, U.S. fighting during this century in the Middle East has been largely from the air. Most ground battles have been skirmishes against Islamic extremist guerrilla groups, not seasoned military troops with heavy artillery.

Leaving these few details about the Middle East wars behind for a moment, officials on both sides are predicting the war between the U.S. and North Korea to be inevitable, as Trump and Kim Jong-un keep upping the ante with their insults to each other.

So, taking into consideration the trillions-of-dollars of borrowed money the U.S. has already spent increasing unrest across the Middle East, with no end in sight, how will the U.S. pay the American defense industry for the war materials necessary to engage North Korea? (The corporate executives of these companies will expect their bonuses, and stockholders will certainly NOT be donating their dividends to the cause.)

Given the many insults Trump has aimed at our European allies, it’s doubtful any of them will pony up cash to loan the U.S. Plus, with the attention of the U.S. military split between the Middle East AND North Korea, Putin’s expansion into the Crimea will undoubtedly spread to other Eastern European nations. So, NATO members will have their hands full in Europe.

Also, China isn’t going to sit by and permit the destruction of their neighbor and ally North Korea. China has 2,183,000 active military troops to add to North Korea’s 1,190,000 active troops, to fight against the United States’ 1,347,300 military members.

Even with a best case scenario, where any sort of nuclear exchange can be avoided, and all action is limited to Eastern Asia, how long can the United States’ money and military hold out in a real war? Especially with the $1.5 trillion gift the GOP just gave to the 0.1% and Big Business? (The Social Security Trust Fund only has about $2 trillion in actual assets, the other $2 trillion in IOU,s from the federal government don’t count. This $2 trillion and eliminating all safety net programs could help, but not for very long in a real war.)

Any rational answers, anyone?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nkorea-says-us-threats-make-war-unavoidable-on-korean-peninsula-kcna/ar-BBGjXRI?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp


.
Get your checkbook out. The previous 8 years we did nothing to prevent this. It could have been stopped. It wasn't, so get your checkbook out.
Yes, there was. Obama made a deal with North Korea: Food against the end of the nuclear program. But Obama never delivered a single piece of bread and cancelled the deal when North Korea launched a missile carrying a satellite.
 
The US Needs to stay out of foreign entanglements. What threat is NK to us? What compelling national interest is served by meddling in their affairs?
Big boys playing with big toys. There is nothing more behind it. And people wonder why the US´ reputation is below the devil`s...
 
The US Needs to stay out of foreign entanglements. What threat is NK to us? What compelling national interest is served by meddling in their affairs?

The threat is fat boy can send a nuke our way and hold nations ransom....this will not be allowed to happen and if China steps in they too will be destroyed and they know it. Most likely what will happen is we hit them hard and their soldiers surrender quickly. They are one year out from putting nukes on an ICBM so that's a good timeline for when any strike occurs.
 
The US Needs to stay out of foreign entanglements. What threat is NK to us? What compelling national interest is served by meddling in their affairs?

The threat is fat boy can send a nuke our way and hold nations ransom....this will not be allowed to happen and if China steps in they too will be destroyed and they know it. Most likely what will happen is we hit them hard and their soldiers surrender quickly. They are one year out from putting nukes on an ICBM so that's a good timeline for when any strike occurs.
Stop blaming your shit on other countries.
 
.
Various estimates place the cost of the U.S. military adventures in the Middle East since 2003 at $4 trillion to $6 trillion to date. This does not include additional costs that will be incurred in the future resulting from these wars.

Also, keep in mind, U.S. fighting during this century in the Middle East has been largely from the air. Most ground battles have been skirmishes against Islamic extremist guerrilla groups, not seasoned military troops with heavy artillery.

Leaving these few details about the Middle East wars behind for a moment, officials on both sides are predicting the war between the U.S. and North Korea to be inevitable, as Trump and Kim Jong-un keep upping the ante with their insults to each other.

So, taking into consideration the trillions-of-dollars of borrowed money the U.S. has already spent increasing unrest across the Middle East, with no end in sight, how will the U.S. pay the American defense industry for the war materials necessary to engage North Korea? (The corporate executives of these companies will expect their bonuses, and stockholders will certainly NOT be donating their dividends to the cause.)

Given the many insults Trump has aimed at our European allies, it’s doubtful any of them will pony up cash to loan the U.S. Plus, with the attention of the U.S. military split between the Middle East AND North Korea, Putin’s expansion into the Crimea will undoubtedly spread to other Eastern European nations. So, NATO members will have their hands full in Europe.

Also, China isn’t going to sit by and permit the destruction of their neighbor and ally North Korea. China has 2,183,000 active military troops to add to North Korea’s 1,190,000 active troops, to fight against the United States’ 1,347,300 military members.

Even with a best case scenario, where any sort of nuclear exchange can be avoided, and all action is limited to Eastern Asia, how long can the United States’ money and military hold out in a real war? Especially with the $1.5 trillion gift the GOP just gave to the 0.1% and Big Business? (The Social Security Trust Fund only has about $2 trillion in actual assets, the other $2 trillion in IOU,s from the federal government don’t count. This $2 trillion and eliminating all safety net programs could help, but not for very long in a real war.)

Any rational answers, anyone?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nkorea-says-us-threats-make-war-unavoidable-on-korean-peninsula-kcna/ar-BBGjXRI?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp


.
Get your checkbook out. The previous 8 years we did nothing to prevent this. It could have been stopped. It wasn't, so get your checkbook out.

Yep and dumped in trump's lap....really nice
 
The US Needs to stay out of foreign entanglements. What threat is NK to us? What compelling national interest is served by meddling in their affairs?

The threat is fat boy can send a nuke our way and hold nations ransom....this will not be allowed to happen and if China steps in they too will be destroyed and they know it. Most likely what will happen is we hit them hard and their soldiers surrender quickly. They are one year out from putting nukes on an ICBM so that's a good timeline for when any strike occurs.

Pakistan has nukes. Why not invade them too?
 
.
Various estimates place the cost of the U.S. military adventures in the Middle East since 2003 at $4 trillion to $6 trillion to date. This does not include additional costs that will be incurred in the future resulting from these wars.

Also, keep in mind, U.S. fighting during this century in the Middle East has been largely from the air. Most ground battles have been skirmishes against Islamic extremist guerrilla groups, not seasoned military troops with heavy artillery.

Leaving these few details about the Middle East wars behind for a moment, officials on both sides are predicting the war between the U.S. and North Korea to be inevitable, as Trump and Kim Jong-un keep upping the ante with their insults to each other.

So, taking into consideration the trillions-of-dollars of borrowed money the U.S. has already spent increasing unrest across the Middle East, with no end in sight, how will the U.S. pay the American defense industry for the war materials necessary to engage North Korea? (The corporate executives of these companies will expect their bonuses, and stockholders will certainly NOT be donating their dividends to the cause.)

Given the many insults Trump has aimed at our European allies, it’s doubtful any of them will pony up cash to loan the U.S. Plus, with the attention of the U.S. military split between the Middle East AND North Korea, Putin’s expansion into the Crimea will undoubtedly spread to other Eastern European nations. So, NATO members will have their hands full in Europe.

Also, China isn’t going to sit by and permit the destruction of their neighbor and ally North Korea. China has 2,183,000 active military troops to add to North Korea’s 1,190,000 active troops, to fight against the United States’ 1,347,300 military members.

Even with a best case scenario, where any sort of nuclear exchange can be avoided, and all action is limited to Eastern Asia, how long can the United States’ money and military hold out in a real war? Especially with the $1.5 trillion gift the GOP just gave to the 0.1% and Big Business? (The Social Security Trust Fund only has about $2 trillion in actual assets, the other $2 trillion in IOU,s from the federal government don’t count. This $2 trillion and eliminating all safety net programs could help, but not for very long in a real war.)

Any rational answers, anyone?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/nkorea-says-us-threats-make-war-unavoidable-on-korean-peninsula-kcna/ar-BBGjXRI?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp


.


Also, China isn’t going to sit by and permit the destruction of their neighbor and ally North Korea. China has 2,183,000 active military troops to add to North Korea’s 1,190,000 active troops, to fight against the United States’ 1,347,300 military members.

All those troops gonna stand at the border and stop our invasion?

The Social Security Trust Fund only has about $2 trillion in actual assets, the other $2 trillion in IOU,s from the federal government don’t count.

What are these "actual", non-IOU assets?
 
The US Needs to stay out of foreign entanglements. What threat is NK to us? What compelling national interest is served by meddling in their affairs?

The threat is fat boy can send a nuke our way and hold nations ransom....this will not be allowed to happen and if China steps in they too will be destroyed and they know it. Most likely what will happen is we hit them hard and their soldiers surrender quickly. They are one year out from putting nukes on an ICBM so that's a good timeline for when any strike occurs.

Pakistan has nukes. Why not invade them too?
We should invade Britain. They have nukes and we have a history of conflict too.
 
The US Needs to stay out of foreign entanglements. What threat is NK to us? What compelling national interest is served by meddling in their affairs?

The threat is fat boy can send a nuke our way and hold nations ransom....this will not be allowed to happen and if China steps in they too will be destroyed and they know it. Most likely what will happen is we hit them hard and their soldiers surrender quickly. They are one year out from putting nukes on an ICBM so that's a good timeline for when any strike occurs.

Pakistan has nukes. Why not invade them too?
We should invade Britain. They have nukes and we have a history of conflict too.
The sun is nuclear, too. Take it out NOW.
 
The same way it hasn't paid for Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. . . .

:lmao:
 
One of the most amazing things to me is the audacity of one country to tell another country that it cannot possess what that country has itself. It would be like me pulling my weapon on my neighbor and demanding he turn over his gun to me because I dont think he should have one.
 
Why not leave NK alone and let them do whatever they want. Let South Korea or Japan deal with them.

No one would fuck with Japan if we would ever get the fuck out of there and let them build their military. Bushido is alive and well.
 
Why not leave NK alone and let them do whatever they want. Let South Korea or Japan deal with them.

I wouldn't want to fuck with Japan if we would ever get the fuck out of there and let them build their military. Bushido is alive and well.
Why do you think N. Korea is so pissed at the US? Another thing that amazes me is how US citizens think other countries "hate us cause they aint us". Wrong. its because the US is always fucking around in their countries and doing shit that doesnt hit our news.
 

Forum List

Back
Top