WorldWatcher
Gold Member
I believe you missed the point. Women who are not married can enter the welfare state by having a child out of wedlock, and then double their entitlements by marrying another woman on welfare.
Under the Constitution, the law cannot accept a structure of three-party marriage establishing an arrangement of government-sponsored economic polygamy as a protected, superior class of marriage under any rational-basis test. Secondly, the law cannot accept any marital arrangement that establishes three classes of marriage, where the classes are defined and either rewarded or discriminated against based on the natural reproductive capacity of one sex.
Actually, the exact OPPOSITE is true.
The women would have to remain UNmarried in order to draw double benefits.
As to the rest of your statement, the law can accept anything we dictate it accepts. Thats what it means to self govern.
I'm still trying to figure out how two women can get married, seeing as the correct definition of marriage is between a man and a woman.
Actually "correct" is a misnomer, that may be your definition. The legal definition under Civil Law is dependent on geography. In some states your definition is the legal definition. In other states (and some other countries) its two consenting, non-related adults. In some other countries it is "a man" and "multiple women".
>>>>