james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,803
- 170
- Thread starter
- #1,401
Here's the kicker though. Stephen Hawking said sometime around 2010 that he wants to know why something is greater than nothing. He's asking why there is a universe vs nothing. He's asking why matter dominates over antimatter, and both matter and antimatter exist naturally. Part of it is common sense and the other part is quantum mechanics. Some think this is further evidence for God since antimatter does not dominate. If it did, then we could have universes pop into existence and have multiverses. However, this isn't the case. Thus, people who think the universe came from "nothing" are wrong and do not have evidence to back up their hypotheses. Matter annihilates antimatter, so they can't co-exist. Yet, Hawking and other atheist scientists keep trying to come up with an explanation. This was one of the biggest setbacks for atheist science. Something greater than nothing holds for many other atheist hypotheses such as quantum physics vs Newtonian (classic) physics. Or an evolutionary origin of the universe vs creation. It's always something vs nothing. We may as well admit that something is greater than nothing has held up since the millennium. It has held up since the beginning.