Wolfstrike
Gold Member
The joke is on you.
The Supreme Court refused to hear a case from San Diego about strict gun permits. (for the 3rd time)
Is it safe to assume they didn't want to hear the case because they know it's unconstitutional and they don't want to say it?
Now, let's everyone take out our letter blocks, picture books, and sock puppets so we can explain to the Supreme Court what their job is.
QUESTION: Do cities have the right to force people to buy nearly unobtainable gun permits to carry guns?
The Second amendment says : "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed"
hhhhmmmm.
Take as much time as you need to go over the question and review the reference materiel until you reach a conclusion.
The Supreme Court refused to hear a case from San Diego about strict gun permits. (for the 3rd time)
Is it safe to assume they didn't want to hear the case because they know it's unconstitutional and they don't want to say it?
Now, let's everyone take out our letter blocks, picture books, and sock puppets so we can explain to the Supreme Court what their job is.
QUESTION: Do cities have the right to force people to buy nearly unobtainable gun permits to carry guns?
The Second amendment says : "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed"
hhhhmmmm.
Take as much time as you need to go over the question and review the reference materiel until you reach a conclusion.