- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,737
- 35,429
- 2,290
Also, why are you so averse to gold? lol
why are you so enamored by it? It only has the value people assign to it, just like a fiat currency
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Also, why are you so averse to gold? lol
can you list a few of them that have failed?
I gave you few that are doing just fine, so now your turn to back up your claim they "all fail"
The history of fiat currency is more or less the same in each circumstance. The government prints too much, creates inflation or hyperinflation and the currency is rejected.
Every fiat currency has failed because eventually fiat ceases to function as a store of value and a medium of exchange.
Fiat currency has reigned in the last forty years, but every fiat currency that has existed in history has eventually failed. A study of 775 fiat currencies indicates the average life expectancy of fiat currencies is 27 years, with some taking a month to crash and others surviving for centuries.
Well, the video series I posted had mentioned it, plus
A Short History of Fiat Currency Failures: 9 Currencies That Have Collapsed
The history of fiat currency is the same each time. Too much is printed, creating inflation or hyperinflation and the currency is rejected.www.hardmoneyhistory.com
why are you so enamored by it? It only has the value people assign to it, just like a fiat currency
Gold is somewhat scarce and has some useI wouldn’t say I’m enamored by it, I just recognize that all fiat currency is backed by nothing, but gold is its own source of value. Gold has been used since like 1500BC and it’s still a desired commodity today. Fiat currencies come and go.
View attachment 886357
Fun little statement at the end of your article. Seems they have not all failed, in fact most have not
It will fail as every fiat currency in history has failed (with the exception, of course, of those still in circulation).
Gold is somewhat scarce and has some use
Otherwise it’s little different than currency
I wouldn’t say I’m enamored by it, I just recognize that all fiat currency is backed by nothing, but gold is its own source of value.
but that value is just what we place on it, no different than fiat currency. I think those that stockpile gold in case of a collapse of society are likely going to be surprised when nobody would trade anything worth having for it.
I suppose I can see that. Gold has typically been a store of value, but in the event of a collapse, I can also see how individuals wouldn’t recognize it as anything of value because “people” can’t do anything with it other than trade it, but there are some people who would have use for it and to them, it would have value over a collapsed dollar.
So, I suppose then that means that these dozens and dozens of investment websites and economists who say gold is a better store of value, they’re all wrong?
It was Isaac Newton who solved that shaving problem NOT some politicianOn what basis are you sure? The basis that governments and private individuals for thousands of years routinely devalued specie in a variety of ways, from shaving coins to debasing the metal by mixing it with junk metals?
Investment websites are there to sell you a product.
Just a quick google search comes up with all sorts of articles saying gold is not all that it is cracked up to be.
Crypto is a joke and lost money is digitalHmm, he said she said? Because a quick search will also show gold to be the be all end all
Also, another thing I hadn’t considered is digital currency. If they push for a digital currency, would you rather have a money you can hold in your hand..or one that is completely hands free that you can’t hold?
Firstly though, before a single product can be made or a paycheck earned,So you have no idea what creates new money?
First there are products that are made that people want, so a price is paid for said product.
Then there is labor required to make that product so people earn the wages for the creation of that product.
This is how the government can figure out the GDP. Right now the money printed greatly outweighs the earned money. That is because people on welfare who get free shit, never earned that money so there is nothing backing that dollar. Do you understand? When the dollar was bound by the ounce of gold, the government couldnt print more than it had in the depository....
Gross Domestic Product.
126.23%
The U.S. debt to GDP ratio is a measure of how much the federal government owes compared to the size of the economy. In 2020, the U.S. debt to GDP ratio was 126.23%, meaning that the government debt was larger than the annual economic output1. This was a significant increase from 2019, when the ratio was 100.81%1. Another way to measure the U.S. debt is to include all types of debt, such as household, business, and state and local government debt. In this case, the U.S. total debt to GDP ratio was 895.4% in 2020, the highest level ever recorded2.
Hmm, he said she said? Because a quick search will also show gold to be the be all end all
Also, another thing I hadn’t considered is digital currency. If they push for a digital currency, would you rather have a money you can hold in your hand..or one that is completely hands free that you can’t hold?
Yep, and as with most things the answer probably lies in the middle
I do not want a 100% digital currency, but I also pretty much never carry cash. The only time I take cash out is if I am going to be travelling. The last trip I took was over Thanksgiving and that was the last time I had cash on my person.
Right but my question was, if ever they do go to a digital currency, wouldn’t a physical asset like gold be a better hedge than a digital currency that you can’t hold? You’re at the mercy of whatever agency is responsible for keeping it safe and accurate.
You also are at the mercy of the digital currency blockchain security systems. (Which have been cracked)Right but my question was, if ever they do go to a digital currency, wouldn’t a physical asset like gold be a better hedge than a digital currency that you can’t hold? You’re at the mercy of whatever agency is responsible for keeping it safe and accurate.
Things only have value when someone (or groups) desire to possess what you have.If you can find someone that wants your gold and will trade it for something you have then sure, that would be awesome. You might find a better market for something like ammo than gold
Right but my question was, if ever they do go to a digital currency, wouldn’t a physical asset like gold be a better hedge than a digital currency that you can’t hold? You’re at the mercy of whatever agency is responsible for keeping it safe and accurate.