How Hillary Clinton / Tim Kane rigged the nomination process for themselves...

[TheGreatGatsby]

Psychiatrists call them hallucinations.

I don't think you're hallucinating. I think you want nothing to do with an inconvenient truth.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

That's adorable, schoolboy. Since you're never ever going to vote Democrat, who gives a fuck?

Exactly the essence of the Democrat party: "Since you're never ever going to vote Democrat, who gives a fuck?"

It's not a battle of ideas. It's a matter of whether one can be unscrupulously used or not.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word

She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.

The people vote, nobody was twisting their arm and nobody was fudging the numbers. She may have played politics, leveraged relationships, and strategized to get super delegates, you can argue whether that's her campaign being smart or corrupt.... However she won the popular vote so the argument is kind of mute.

She didn't win the popular vote other than officially. We saw it from the start with the Iowa shenanigans. Her people rigged it; the media pretended she was way ahead (which was somewhat true with the superdelegate narrative) and they just kept cramming through even though people ultimately didn't want her.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

She didn't win the popular vote, except in the sense that she received almost 4 million more votes than Sanders did?

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word

She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.

The people vote, nobody was twisting their arm and nobody was fudging the numbers. She may have played politics, leveraged relationships, and strategized to get super delegates, you can argue whether that's her campaign being smart or corrupt.... However she won the popular vote so the argument is kind of mute.

She didn't win the popular vote other than officially. We saw it from the start with the Iowa shenanigans. Her people rigged it; the media pretended she was way ahead (which was somewhat true with the superdelegate narrative) and they just kept cramming through even though people ultimately didn't want her.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

She didn't win the popular vote, except in the sense that she received almost 4 million more votes than Sanders did?

That's just two million she had to swing, then, which she did via fraudulent counts and data manipulation.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word

She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.

The people vote, nobody was twisting their arm and nobody was fudging the numbers. She may have played politics, leveraged relationships, and strategized to get super delegates, you can argue whether that's her campaign being smart or corrupt.... However she won the popular vote so the argument is kind of mute.

She didn't win the popular vote other than officially. We saw it from the start with the Iowa shenanigans. Her people rigged it; the media pretended she was way ahead (which was somewhat true with the superdelegate narrative) and they just kept cramming through even though people ultimately didn't want her.

What the fuck is that supposed to mean?

She didn't win the popular vote, except in the sense that she received almost 4 million more votes than Sanders did?

That's just two million she had to swing, then, which she did via fraudulent counts and data manipulation.

Of course. The massive conspiracy.

And - let me guess - you've got no actual evidence to support this, other than your feelings.

 

[Slade3200]

Nice find, it is interesting... She still needed to get the votes though, which she did... don't think rigged is the right word

She put her head corruption officer in place to make sure the votes were there. Not sure what you're saying otherwise.

The people vote, nobody was twisting their arm and nobody was fudging the numbers. She may have played politics, leveraged relationships, and strategized to get super delegates, you can argue whether that's her campaign being smart or corrupt.... However she won the popular vote so the argument is kind of mute.

She didn't win the popular vote other than officially. We saw it from the start with the Iowa shenanigans. Her people rigged it; the media pretended she was way ahead (which was somewhat true with the superdelegate narrative) and they just kept cramming through even though people ultimately didn't want her.

What are you talking about? Take away the super delegates she won more states and more of the popular vote. If you have evidence showing otherwise then post it.

 

[konradv]

Psychiatrists call them hallucinations.

I don't think you're hallucinating. I think you want nothing to do with an inconvenient truth.

Tread lightly. Editing isn't supposed to change context.

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

Psychiatrists call them hallucinations.

I don't think you're hallucinating. I think you want nothing to do with an inconvenient truth.

Tread lightly. Editing isn't supposed to change context.

The truth will always be inconvenient for you.