How fast can the 2nd amendment be erased?

[sarahgop]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

 

[Hossfly]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

 

[sarahgop]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

 

[Hossfly]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

 

[Nutz]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

and you support these idiot teapers

 

[Hossfly]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

and you support these idiot teapers

Yes. I are one.

 

[Hossfly]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

and you support these idiot teapers

 

[amrchaos]

militias are civilian groups, not professional--and your local church group or club can easily double as a civilian militia.

I would say the local police is the closest thing to a militia except they are professionals in that they are paid for their services.

 

[sarahgop]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

and you support these idiot teapers

I support the real conservatives like Rand Paul

 

[sarahgop]

militias are civilian groups, not professional--and your local church group or club can easily double as a civilian militia.

I would say the local police is the closest thing to a militia except they are professionals in that they are paid for their services.

Hillarys supreme court can say a militia is anything they want it to be.

 

[Contumacious]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

There is no right to judicial review.


We are on our own.

The SCOTUS already ruled that the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is NOT a right but a privilege subject to bureaucratic discretion.


.

 

[Nutz]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

and you support these idiot teapers

I support the real conservatives like Rand Paul

I like rand paul too...most yrue conservatives know a little more about government than you

 

[S.J.]

Americans aren't going to give up their guns.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

It's hard to believe anyone is truly this stupid.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

There is no right to judicial review.


We are on our own.

The SCOTUS already ruled that the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is NOT a right but a privilege subject to bureaucratic discretion.


.

Please seek out the mental health treatment you so clearly need.

 

[Contumacious]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

There is no right to judicial review.


We are on our own.

The SCOTUS already ruled that the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is NOT a right but a privilege subject to bureaucratic discretion.


.

Please seek out the mental health treatment you so clearly need.

.

 

[jon_berzerk]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws.

that used to be the case

 

[amrchaos]

I'm sorry, but you need an Amendment to overrule/write an Amendment.


The truth is that 'gun rights' is a third rail issue that some lib politicians hasn't figured out yet and the right loves a barbeque!

 

[Ernie S.]

All it takes is for the supreme court to decide that the 2nd amendment states that only a well regulated militia can have guns and just like that there is no longer the right to bear arms by individuals.

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. That's the job of Congress. Sorry 'bout that.

Hillarys supreme court wont worry about nonsense like that. Even Roberts now helps Obama and dems write laws.

Biggest fuck up of the Bush Admin, without a doubt.

 

[IsaacNewton]

The founders intended the 2nd amendment to allow the people to protect their freedom from the government.
That was the late 1700s when muskets and cannons were high tech and anyone could own one or make one.

Exactly how does that translate to the present day. Even if every American is armed with a fully auto M-16 we could never begin to defeat our own army. It would be over in a few days.

So what's the thought here on people that think the 2nd amendment somehow is the same as in 1780? We'd have to have tanks, helicopters, F-18s, aircraft carriers, and nukes.

So other than for personal protection what does the 2nd amendment to for us?