Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee, Wally....
You mean that increased CO2 would lead to more rapid growth of fauna --because CO2 is plant food-- which might lead to more rapid absorption of CO2, thereby probably-cum-more-than-likely mitigating any relatively trivial amount of industrial CO2 that man might contribute to the planet's total?
Well, that's not what Eddie Haskell has been saying.
Gee, Wally....
You mean that increased CO2 would lead to more rapid growth of fauna --because CO2 is plant food-- which might lead to more rapid absorption of CO2, thereby probably-cum-more-than-likely mitigating any relatively trivial amount of industrial CO2 that man might contribute to the planet's total?
Well, that's not what Eddie Haskell has been saying.
Trivial amoounts?!?! We put out more in days than all the volcanoes on earth put out in a year. Perhaps plants would grow faster, but there might be more drought, also. You can't hang your hat on one factor and one line of outcomes. Climate is more complex than than and the major reason the deniers have anything to talk about at all.
It is not 5% Dooodeee..... The increase is over 100 ppm, from 280 ppm to 387 ppm. That is close to 40%.
And man's contribution to that total has been about 5%.It is not 5% Dooodeee..... The increase is over 100 ppm, from 280 ppm to 387 ppm. That is close to 40%.