Confounding
Gold Member
- Jan 31, 2016
- 7,073
- 1,555
- 280
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
I am glad to hear you say you would love to see these 60+ Democrats punished for failing to comply with security measures / regs, for NOT conducting background checks that would have immediately flagged them as being connected to terrorists.I wasn't aware of any breach of protocol. If they broke the law I would love to see some Democrats in handcuffs. I doubt that will happen, though. What I'm arguing and you keep ignoring is the fact that they WERE hacked, even if it was due to negligence and stupidity.
As far as the DNC e-mails, we are going to have to disagree based on our definitions of 'hacked'.
Again, I believe 'hacked' is an active term, one that means the 'hacker' aggressively attacks your system and finds a way around your defenses to get in...without your 'assistance'.
Unlike you, I believe sending you an un-known e-mail and you completely ignore the basic security protocols / rules (Do NOT open e-mails from un-known sources, SCAN them all before you open any, etc) and WELOME the hacker in, you have just compromised your own system.
The term 'hacking' is deliberately preferred by the anti-Trump snowflakes because 'illegal collusion' seems much more possible with 'hacking' than it does with a bunch of enemy cyber nerds sitting around in a 'computer bank' sending out 'land-shark' e-mails hoping someone is stupid / lazy enough to blow off their security procedures / rules and just open the e-mail up.
The definition of hacking is "the gaining of unauthorized access to data in a system or computer." You can actually be charged with hacking without actually developing any hacking software at all. If you somehow figured out the password used by somebody important and gained access to a bunch of secret information you could be jailed for hacking.