House GOP refuses to boost funding for election security

Confounding

Gold Member
Jan 31, 2016
7,073
1,551
280
Should there be more funding, or is true that the program is fully funded and doesn't need additional funding?

House GOP refuses to boost funding for election security

House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference.

Democrats want to continue funding the grants program to help states boost security for their voting systems, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Republicans, however, argue that the program, which is overseen by the federal Election Assistance Commission, is fully funded and does not need the additional allocations.
 
In this Country, the States run elections. There are no Federal Elections, only State elections.

Even when you vote for President, you're not really voting for President, you're voting for your State's Electoral College.
 
In this Country, the States run elections. There are no Federal Elections, only State elections.

Even when you vote for President, you're not really voting for President, you're voting for your State's Electoral College.
From the article...

"House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference."

Are you in agreement with what they're doing by refusing to add funding for additional security for STATE ELECTIONS?
 
I thought our results couldnt be hacked? If they cant, then whats the point?
Or was our previous administration lying?
 
From the article...

"House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference."

Are you in agreement with what they're doing by refusing to add funding for additional security for STATE ELECTIONS?

Yes. Federal Money ALWAYS means Federal Control.

We are supposed to be The United STATES of America. 50 different Sovereign States bonded together by a common cause.

We are slowly becoming not, but we're not supposed to be.

I don't want one ruler, one position of absolute power.

Would you really want Trump having absolute authority over the entire Country?

History is good
 
When the Dirty Democrats stop blocking Voter ID laws and registering non-citizens to vote they might be taken seriously.
 
Should there be more funding, or is true that the program is fully funded and doesn't need additional funding?

House GOP refuses to boost funding for election security

House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference.

Democrats want to continue funding the grants program to help states boost security for their voting systems, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Republicans, however, argue that the program, which is overseen by the federal Election Assistance Commission, is fully funded and does not need the additional allocations.
The GOP needs Russia this November to hold the Senate.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
I thought our results couldnt be hacked? If they cant, then whats the point?
Or was our previous administration lying?

Anything that operates on code can be hacked. Anybody that says otherwise is either ignorant or lying. I'm not saying Russia hacked the election, but what I did say is true.
 
Should there be more funding, or is true that the program is fully funded and doesn't need additional funding?

House GOP refuses to boost funding for election security

House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference.

Democrats want to continue funding the grants program to help states boost security for their voting systems, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Republicans, however, argue that the program, which is overseen by the federal Election Assistance Commission, is fully funded and does not need the additional allocations.
The GOP needs Russia this November to hold the Senate.

Nah. The GOP will do just fine.

Its the Dems who need the help. That blue wave ain't coming there buddy. LOL
 
I thought our results couldnt be hacked? If they cant, then whats the point?
Or was our previous administration lying?

Anything that operates on code can be hacked. Anybody that says otherwise is either ignorant or lying. I'm not saying Russia hacked the election, but what I did say is true.

The only think Russia hacked was the DNC servers.

The FBI told the IT guy who runs the DNC servers that they could be hacked. That idiot ignored the warning.

Oh and Barry was POTUS for all of this. Trump was a candidate for POTUS. Not the POTUS. Barry's intelligence and cyber people should have stopped the hacking.

Why didn't they??

That's the question everyone should be asking.

Trump wasn't POTUS and he had no power. Barry WAS POTUS. And he had the power.
 
Should there be more funding, or is true that the program is fully funded and doesn't need additional funding?

House GOP refuses to boost funding for election security

House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference.

Democrats want to continue funding the grants program to help states boost security for their voting systems, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Republicans, however, argue that the program, which is overseen by the federal Election Assistance Commission, is fully funded and does not need the additional allocations.
The GOP needs Russia this November to hold the Senate.

Nah. The GOP will do just fine.

Its the Dems who need the help. That blue wave ain't coming there buddy. LOL
It’s coming. Especially now that it’s harder the GOP to petition Russia to install officials.
 
Additional security? By whose definition, Democrats? The party that refuses to support Voter ID laws? It doesn't pass the smell test. Democrats are liars and should not be trusted, only defeated.
 
Should there be more funding, or is true that the program is fully funded and doesn't need additional funding?

House GOP refuses to boost funding for election security

House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference.

Democrats want to continue funding the grants program to help states boost security for their voting systems, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Republicans, however, argue that the program, which is overseen by the federal Election Assistance Commission, is fully funded and does not need the additional allocations.
The GOP needs Russia this November to hold the Senate.

Clearly Putin has Mueller, the DOJ and the GOP in his back pocket. Putin is running the executive, and legislative branch by proxy. And, this Kennedy retirement has me thinking. Could Putin have something on him as well? When will the arrests begin?
 
The FBI and US IG cited that investigations showed the Democrats were not 'HACKED' but instead fell prey to 'PHISHING' software because they did not follow the most basic security protocols and procedures.

How much money - EXACTLY - do we need to spend on training and educating the ignorant. lazy, national security-compromising Democrats?

In the House, the Awans - terrorist-connected Pakistani spies - were hired as IT workers because approx. 64 Democrats simply did not obey rules / regs requiring them to do a basic background check on them before hiring them.

Hillary Clinton had hours and hours of training on classified information - how to handle it, transport it, store it, destroy it. She was 'read-into' many different levels of security clearances and received training every time both as she was 'read-in' and 'read-out'. Every time she received training she signed a govt document acknowledging she understood everything....and she STILL operated an illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured (all illegal) server illegally containing TOP SECRET data, STILL allowed people without clearances access the data, STILL knowingly violated the FOIA and Federal Records Act more than 15,000 times, and STILL allowed 6 separate foreign entities to acquire the TOP SECRET data on her server....

Obama learned about what the Russians were doing in 2014...and did nothing.....he knew Hillary was jeopardizing national security and refused to shut it down....

SO PLEASE F*ING TELL ME, HOW MANY MILLIONS OF DOLLARS DO WE NEED TO SPEND TO GET THE DEMOCRATS TO STOP BREAKNG LAWS, JEOPARDIZING AND COMPROMISING US NATIONAL SECURITY?
 
Anything that operates on code can be hacked. Anybody that says otherwise is either ignorant or lying. I'm not saying Russia hacked the election, but what I did say is true.

It's got to be connected to the internet in order to be hacked remotely.

Voting machine tabulators are not. You would have to physically have possession of the machine to hack it.

Something you just don't hear about from the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media
 
The FBI and US IG cited that investigations showed the Democrats were not 'HACKED' but instead fell prey to 'PHISHING' software because they did not follow the most basic security protocols and procedures.

Semantics.

Developing phishing software to get access to secret government information is hacking.
 
Should there be more funding, or is true that the program is fully funded and doesn't need additional funding?

House GOP refuses to boost funding for election security

House Republicans are refusing to provide additional funding for state election security grants in a spending bill despite the move upsetting Democrats pointing at Russia's election interference.

Democrats want to continue funding the grants program to help states boost security for their voting systems, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Republicans, however, argue that the program, which is overseen by the federal Election Assistance Commission, is fully funded and does not need the additional allocations.
did russia hack the voting booths?
 
Of course republican's don't want voting secure. It's how they won the last election and they know that they can't win on the merit of their platform so they need to do anything they can (ie. cheat) in order to win.
 

Forum List

Back
Top