Homosexuals Flock to Obamacare

[Truthbetold]

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

By Julie Appleby
7 hours ago
The Daily Beast

Offering a first glimpse of the health care needs of Americans who bought coverage through federal and state marketplaces, an analysis of the first two months of claims data shows the new enrollees are more likely to use expensive specialty drugs to treat conditions like HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C than those with job-based insurance.

The sample of claims data—considered a preliminary look at whether new enrollees are sicker-than-average—also found that prescriptions for treating pain, seizures, and depression are also proportionally higher in exchange plans, according to Express Scripts, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit management companies.

Whether that trend holds true across all insurers—and continues to be the case with the millions who signed up after the first two months of the year—will answer one of the biggest questions facing insurers and proponents of the health law: What is the proportion of sick versus healthy enrollees? The answer is key to whether premiums rise in coming years, because insurers need a large number of healthy enrollees to offset the costs of treating the sick.

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Breaking news:

Intelligent human beings damned glad to finally able to afford health care insurance.

Insurers have always needed a majority of their policy holders to be healthy.

ObamaCare is not insurance.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Great. We're all being forced to pay for medicine for those who choose to promiscuously buttfuck.

 

[S.J.]

This comes as no surprise. I'm sure the same holds true for drug abusers as well.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

This comes as no surprise. I'm sure the same holds true for drug abusers as well.

But buttfuckers are to be embraced and granted tax breaks and other subsidies while drug addicts are still marginalized.

 

[Politico]

You hate gay people we get it.

 

[Geaux4it]

I hate paying for other people's issues. Fudgepackers, obesity, smokers..... can't see them from my house

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

Breaking news:

Intelligent human beings damned glad to finally able to afford health care insurance.

Insurers have always needed a majority of their policy holders to be healthy.

ObamaCare is not insurance.

I bet these 'people' fall into one of two categories

1- They could of indeed afforded insurance previously, however, their priorities were aligned differently. I'm fine with that

2- They are getting insurance now off the backs of the working man for free

-Geaux

 

[Defiant1]

Breaking news:

Intelligent human beings damned glad to finally able to afford health care insurance.

Insurers have always needed a majority of their policy holders to be healthy.

ObamaCare is not insurance.

I bet these 'people' fall into one of two categories

1- They could of indeed afforded insurance previously, however, their priorities were aligned differently. I'm fine with that

2- They are getting insurance now off the backs of the working man for free

-Geaux

With all this fair and equal talk coming from the White House, I'm waiting for Obama to propose the Affordable Car Act so I can get a Lincoln Navigator.

 

[jillian]

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

By Julie Appleby
7 hours ago
The Daily Beast

Offering a first glimpse of the health care needs of Americans who bought coverage through federal and state marketplaces, an analysis of the first two months of claims data shows the new enrollees are more likely to use expensive specialty drugs to treat conditions like HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C than those with job-based insurance.

The sample of claims data—considered a preliminary look at whether new enrollees are sicker-than-average—also found that prescriptions for treating pain, seizures, and depression are also proportionally higher in exchange plans, according to Express Scripts, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit management companies.

Whether that trend holds true across all insurers—and continues to be the case with the millions who signed up after the first two months of the year—will answer one of the biggest questions facing insurers and proponents of the health law: What is the proportion of sick versus healthy enrollees? The answer is key to whether premiums rise in coming years, because insurers need a large number of healthy enrollees to offset the costs of treating the sick.

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

not homosexuals... the article says AIDS patients. that is largely, but not totally, homosexuals. heterosexual women are a large percentage of new cases. so your thread title is clearly intended to elicit a response from the loon brigade.

as for the rest... d'uh... people with chronic illnesses need insurance coverage. and given tat there's no such thing as the obama insurance agency, you should be glad for the private insurance companies who will only make money on this.

to normal people people being covered by insurance instead of having to declare bankruptcy because of medical expenses is a good thing.

 

[Geaux4it]

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

By Julie Appleby
7 hours ago
The Daily Beast

Offering a first glimpse of the health care needs of Americans who bought coverage through federal and state marketplaces, an analysis of the first two months of claims data shows the new enrollees are more likely to use expensive specialty drugs to treat conditions like HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C than those with job-based insurance.

The sample of claims data—considered a preliminary look at whether new enrollees are sicker-than-average—also found that prescriptions for treating pain, seizures, and depression are also proportionally higher in exchange plans, according to Express Scripts, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit management companies.

Whether that trend holds true across all insurers—and continues to be the case with the millions who signed up after the first two months of the year—will answer one of the biggest questions facing insurers and proponents of the health law: What is the proportion of sick versus healthy enrollees? The answer is key to whether premiums rise in coming years, because insurers need a large number of healthy enrollees to offset the costs of treating the sick.

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

not homosexuals... the article says AIDS patients. that is largely, but not totally, homosexuals. heterosexual women are a large percentage of new cases. so your thread title is clearly intended to elicit a response from the loon brigade.

as for the rest... d'uh... people with chronic illnesses need insurance coverage. and given tat there's no such thing as the obama insurance agency, you should be glad for the private insurance companies who will only make money on this.

to normal people people being covered by insurance instead of having to declare bankruptcy because of medical expenses is a good thing.

People file bankruptcy all the time for poor decision making. Part of life

-Geaux

 

[Gadawg73]

Many AIDS patients are not homosexual.

 

[Stephanie]

Breaking news:

Intelligent human beings damned glad to finally able to afford health care insurance.

Insurers have always needed a majority of their policy holders to be healthy.

ObamaCare is not insurance.

yeah sure, they are RUSHING out, camping out on side walks, sleeping in their cars just to purchase this high priced insurance...students just starting in life have so much money they will need to decide which is more important, an overpriced insurance policy or paying for food, rent, gas, etc etc

you people lie and have no shame doing it
it's ugly and deceitful...but all that is ok in the progressive politics as long as it gets what you want

 

[Stephanie]

 

[Truthbetold]

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

By Julie Appleby
7 hours ago
The Daily Beast

Offering a first glimpse of the health care needs of Americans who bought coverage through federal and state marketplaces, an analysis of the first two months of claims data shows the new enrollees are more likely to use expensive specialty drugs to treat conditions like HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C than those with job-based insurance.

The sample of claims data—considered a preliminary look at whether new enrollees are sicker-than-average—also found that prescriptions for treating pain, seizures, and depression are also proportionally higher in exchange plans, according to Express Scripts, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit management companies.

Whether that trend holds true across all insurers—and continues to be the case with the millions who signed up after the first two months of the year—will answer one of the biggest questions facing insurers and proponents of the health law: What is the proportion of sick versus healthy enrollees? The answer is key to whether premiums rise in coming years, because insurers need a large number of healthy enrollees to offset the costs of treating the sick.

AIDS Patients Flock to Obamacare

not homosexuals... the article says AIDS patients. that is largely, but not totally, homosexuals. heterosexual women are a large percentage of new cases. so your thread title is clearly intended to elicit a response from the loon brigade.

as for the rest... d'uh... people with chronic illnesses need insurance coverage. and given tat there's no such thing as the obama insurance agency, you should be glad for the private insurance companies who will only make money on this.

to normal people people being covered by insurance instead of having to declare bankruptcy because of medical expenses is a good thing.

I learned that tactic from Yahoo news and other liberal media who will always slant the title towards the Dems/socialists/libs/commies.

Plus when you look at the aids demographics most by far are gays so I figured it was a pretty safe bet to change the title a bit. If its ok for Libs to do it then so can I

 

[rdean]

At least the gays have teeth. Heard a joke on American Idol. Harry asked Keith what is 40 yards long and has 8 teeth? Keith said he didn't know. Harry said the front row of a Keith Urban concert.

 

[srlip]

Once saw a video, 26 year old gay, had been having sex for 10 years at that point, had had an average of 3 (different partner) sexual encounters per DAY, for those 10 years, and he had every STD known to man, including active AIDS. duh, no KIDDING? since every guy that he did it with was SIMILARLY idiotic and infested.

 

[rdean]

Once saw a video, 26 year old gay, had been having sex for 10 years at that point, had had an average of 3 (different partner) sexual encounters per DAY, for those 10 years, and he had every STD known to man, including active AIDS. duh, no KIDDING? since every guy that he did it with was SIMILARLY idiotic and infested.

3 sexual encounters a day? For 10 years? Sounds exhausting. That's over 10,000 different people. Yea, that sounds believable.

 

[rdean]

Once saw a video, 26 year old gay, had been having sex for 10 years at that point, had had an average of 3 (different partner) sexual encounters per DAY, for those 10 years, and he had every STD known to man, including active AIDS. duh, no KIDDING? since every guy that he did it with was SIMILARLY idiotic and infested.

You saw a video of a 26 year old guy having sex with 10,000 people. Must have been a long video. Did you have enough popcorn?

 

[bodecea]

This comes as no surprise. I'm sure the same holds true for drug abusers as well.

But buttfuckers are to be embraced and granted tax breaks and other subsidies while drug addicts are still marginalized.

Can tell you think about that.....eh?