Historical marker for Longview's 1919 race riot to be placed outside courthouse

horselightning

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2013
12,426
6,892
1,928

here we go again with liberals and blacks being racist against caucasions. it was both sides faults an d both sides killed. black and liberals need to stop using this to make it like one side is better then the other., so sick of this racist shit.
 

here we go again with liberals and blacks being racist against caucasions. it was both sides faults an d both sides killed. black and liberals need to stop using this to make it like one side is better then the other., so sick of this racist shit.

This was not "both sides". This was blatant racism. While it was common at the time, there is no excuse for killing someone because they loved a person of another race.
 
This was not "both sides". This was blatant racism. While it was common at the time, there is no excuse for killing someone because they loved a person of another race.
~~~~~~
Indeed, it was at the time a Democrat Neo-Marxist ideological mindset to segregate whites from Blacks. Didn't Woodrow Wilson (Democrat) make that the law?
It still is and it is now nuanced by Demomrat Marxist-Socialists.
**********​
**********​
 
~~~~~~
Indeed, it was at the time a Democrat Neo-Marxist ideological mindset to segregate whites from Blacks. Didn't Woodrow Wilson (Democrat) make that the law?
It still is and it is now nuanced by Demomrat Marxist-Socialists.
**********​
**********​
both sides did it and both sides died from it. now we got the blm kkk to deal with it.
 
This was not "both sides". This was blatant racism. While it was common at the time, there is no excuse for killing someone because they loved a person of another race.
yes it is both side were fighting for space , both sides died from it. its just black kkk blm shit.
 
No, it was not both sides. There were a few blacks who worked to improve their lot in life. But the white there didin't like it and attacked them.

It was not both sides that lynched a black man for seeing a white woman.
It was not both sides that murdered a black reporter accused of writing an article showing the black man in a favorable light.
It was not both sides that hunted down and murdered a 60 year old black man.

The above actions are what caused the riots.
 
No, it was not both sides. There were a few blacks who worked to improve their lot in life. But the white there didin't like it and attacked them.

It was not both sides that lynched a black man for seeing a white woman.
It was not both sides that murdered a black reporter accused of writing an article showing the black man in a favorable light.
It was not both sides that hunted down and murdered a 60 year old black man.

The above actions are what caused the riots.
It should be against the law for blacks to date White women.
 
It should be against the law for blacks to date White women.

3 people murdered and huge riots started, but you focused on the interracial couple?

No, it should not be illegal. The gov't should not determine who someone dates, loves or marries. You claim to want smaller gov't, but you want it in the most intrusive places that it does not belong.
 
No, it was not both sides. There were a few blacks who worked to improve their lot in life. But the white there didin't like it and attacked them.

It was not both sides that lynched a black man for seeing a white woman.
It was not both sides that murdered a black reporter accused of writing an article showing the black man in a favorable light.
It was not both sides that hunted down and murdered a 60 year old black man.

The above actions are what caused the riots.
it was read about it again.
 
~~~~~~
Indeed, it was at the time a Democrat Neo-Marxist ideological mindset to segregate whites from Blacks. Didn't Woodrow Wilson (Democrat) make that the law?
It still is and it is now nuanced by Demomrat Marxist-Socialists.
**********​
**********​

Democrats were mostly conservatives at that time.
 
I have to laugh at the idea of blaming a particular political party for actions of 100 years ago. The parties are not the point.

Yeah, well... these are people who can't see beyond the current Dem v. Rep nonsense.

Dems are this, and always have been, even when the dinosaurs were roaming the earth, and Reps are that... always have been, nothing changes.

Why? Because then it means they don't have to learn anything, their ignorance becomes fact.
 
No, it was not. The 3 dead were black. Killed by whites for no good reason. Anything after that was meeting force with force.
both sides had deaths in the riot./ read again. victim mentality person. 38 people died 23 black 15 white.
 
Last edited:
both sides had deaths in the riot./ read again. victim mentality person. 38 people died 23 black 15 white.

Yes, both sides had deaths.

But only ONE SIDE chose to start the shit that became a riot.

If a mob comes to my house, I will shoot to defend myself. But I will not get a bunch of my buddies together and chase a 60 year old man into a cornfield where we would murder him.

Maybe you should read about the riot again. You seem to have missed some key points.
 

here we go again with liberals and blacks being racist against caucasions. it was both sides faults an d both sides killed. black and liberals need to stop using this to make it like one side is better then the other., so sick of this racist shit.
East Texas still has Sundown towns.
 
East Texas still has Sundown towns.

There is a town in Alabama called Double Springs. Great canoeing in that area.

But the Mom & Pop grocery store had a sign (I saw it in the mid-1980s) that said "N*gger don't let the sun set on your black ass in Double Springs".

Hate and ignorance thrives in some places.
 
There is a town in Alabama called Double Springs. Great canoeing in that area.

But the Mom & Pop grocery store had a sign (I saw it in the mid-1980s) that said "N*gger don't let the sun set on your black ass in Double Springs".

Hate and ignorance thrives in some places.
black do it all the time blm signs
 
Yes, both sides had deaths.

But only ONE SIDE chose to start the shit that became a riot.

If a mob comes to my house, I will shoot to defend myself. But I will not get a bunch of my buddies together and chase a 60 year old man into a cornfield where we would murder him.

Maybe you should read about the riot again. You seem to have missed some key points.
both didl. it takes both side to cause a riot.
 

Forum List

Back
Top