Hillary's Election loss blamed on "Russian hackers".

"Hillary's election loss blamed on Russian hackers" is only a meme in Trumpland.

Nobody's actually making this claim.

From everything we can possibly read on this, Russia actively meant to interfere in our democratic process in order to help Trump win. This is not a claim, but a summation of all the evidence gathered and which the CIA says is the case.

We do know from tracing their digital footsteps that Russian hackers proliferated social media with fake news meant to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton by accusing her of all the things that Donald Trump is actually guilty of. And that's kind of the strange fascination with this election in that just enough people bought that con.

In the end, the smallest fraction of the youthful Obama coalition that preferred Bernie Sanders splintered off to Jill Stein, and it's mathematically the reason why she didn't beat Trump by 5 million like Obama did Romney, but only half that.That's the math, but why those people didn't line up behind her even though they dislike Trump even more is partially due to Russia's success of helping to create the perception in the heat of the campaign that she was somehow worse than Trump not because she's worse than Trump but because she's not purely liberal enough.

Now, if communists who desperately want their former Soviet empire back had actively helped Hillary and the Democrats, Trumpland would be fucking hysterical right now, but because commies helped their guy, their moral relativism is glaringly obvious right now.
 
Last edited:
The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability.
Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House

It's almost funny if it wasn't so sad. The people that believed the Clintons were responsible for multiple deaths had no intention of voting for Clinton to begin with. The nitwits that came out with the whole Podesta Satanic dinner crap had no intention of voting for Clinton. Ever. The people that bought into it had no intention of voting for Clinton ever. Comey did not influence the election either way.

The Democrats are using this to circumvent looking at the problems they have and the issue presented. Screw 'em.
 
"Hillary's election loss blamed on Russian hackers" is only a meme in Trumpland.

Nobody's actually making this claim.

From everything we can possibly read on this, Russia actively meant to interfere in our democratic process in order to help Trump win. This is not a claim, but a summation of all the evidence gathered and which the CIA says is the case.

We do know from tracing their digital footsteps that Russian hackers proliferated social media with fake news meant to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton by accusing her of all the things that Donald Trump is actually guilty of. And that's kind of the strange fascination with this election in that just enough people bought that con.

In the end, the smallest fraction of the youthful Obama coalition that preferred Bernie Sanders splintered off to Jill Stein, and it's mathematically the reason why she didn't beat Trump by 5 million like Obama did Romney, but only half that.That's the math, but why those people didn't line up behind her even though they dislike Trump even more is partially due to Russia's success of helping to create the perception in the heat of the campaign that she was somehow worse than Trump not because she's worse than Trump but because she's not purely liberal enough.

Now, if communists who desperately want their former Soviet empire back had actively helped Hillary and the Democrats, Trumpland would be fucking hysterical right now, but because commies helped their guy, their moral relativism is glaringly obvious right now.

Lol, no, it's wild speculation. The state Dept nor the CIA have any evidence. First, it was the Russians, then some computer geeks, ....what's up next? Planet X is somehow affecting the magnetite within the electronic voting units?
 
Elections have consequences and at the end of the day, Trump won. Dems can come along for the ride, but they have to sit in the back.
 
So,. it couldn't be that...

... people were fed up with the Democratic status quo...

... and just wanted Change could it?
 
Now, if communists who desperately want their former Soviet empire back had actively helped Hillary and the Democrats, Trumpland would be fucking hysterical right now, but because commies helped their guy, their moral relativism is glaringly obvious right now.
Did the CIA happen to mention that the real problem was the dishonesty and lying the emails revealed? Leftists are all worked up over who did what to get it out there but not the revelations themselves. What a corrupt bunch!
 
"Hillary's election loss blamed on Russian hackers" is only a meme in Trumpland.

Nobody's actually making this claim.

From everything we can possibly read on this, Russia actively meant to interfere in our democratic process in order to help Trump win. This is not a claim, but a summation of all the evidence gathered and which the CIA says is the case.

What "evidence?" Aside from fake news, there is none.

We do know from tracing their digital footsteps that Russian hackers proliferated social media with fake news meant to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton by accusing her of all the things that Donald Trump is actually guilty of. And that's kind of the strange fascination with this election in that just enough people bought that con.

Really? says who? Where is the evidence?

More fake news.

In the end, the smallest fraction of the youthful Obama coalition that preferred Bernie Sanders splintered off to Jill Stein, and it's mathematically the reason why she didn't beat Trump by 5 million like Obama did Romney, but only half that.That's the math, but why those people didn't line up behind her even though they dislike Trump even more is partially due to Russia's success of helping to create the perception in the heat of the campaign that she was somehow worse than Trump not because she's worse than Trump but because she's not purely liberal enough.

In other words, if Hillary would have got more votes in the right states she would have won.

Now, if communists who desperately want their former Soviet empire back had actively helped Hillary and the Democrats, Trumpland would be fucking hysterical right now, but because commies helped their guy, their moral relativism is glaringly obvious right now.

You're a douche bag spouting fake news.
 
Now, if communists who desperately want their former Soviet empire back had actively helped Hillary and the Democrats, Trumpland would be fucking hysterical right now, but because commies helped their guy, their moral relativism is glaringly obvious right now.
Did the CIA happen to mention that the real problem was the dishonesty and lying the emails revealed? Leftists are all worked up over who did what to get it out there but not the revelations themselves. What a corrupt bunch!
Hillary's supporters had no problem with her exposed lying. They will turn a blind eye to anything to gain power.
 
"Hillary's election loss blamed on Russian hackers" is only a meme in Trumpland.

Nobody's actually making this claim.

From everything we can possibly read on this, Russia actively meant to interfere in our democratic process in order to help Trump win. This is not a claim, but a summation of all the evidence gathered and which the CIA says is the case.

We do know from tracing their digital footsteps that Russian hackers proliferated social media with fake news meant to cast doubt on Hillary Clinton by accusing her of all the things that Donald Trump is actually guilty of. And that's kind of the strange fascination with this election in that just enough people bought that con.

In the end, the smallest fraction of the youthful Obama coalition that preferred Bernie Sanders splintered off to Jill Stein, and it's mathematically the reason why she didn't beat Trump by 5 million like Obama did Romney, but only half that.That's the math, but why those people didn't line up behind her even though they dislike Trump even more is partially due to Russia's success of helping to create the perception in the heat of the campaign that she was somehow worse than Trump not because she's worse than Trump but because she's not purely liberal enough.

Now, if communists who desperately want their former Soviet empire back had actively helped Hillary and the Democrats, Trumpland would be fucking hysterical right now, but because commies helped their guy, their moral relativism is glaringly obvious right now.
Are Democrats on the communist side or the NAZI side?
 

Forum List

Back
Top