Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Funny....Stats is ALWAYS claiming to know ALL the polls. seems to have missed a few. Could be dishonesty or stupidity. Maybe he should run a poll on that?That means the Democrats are gonna have to find a lot more dead people to vote for her. Maybe James Carville can dig up a few hundred thousand.
Iowa at this point means something but the scale is flawed. You only have one TRUE runner on the democrat side to pick. So that sides numbers are skewed.More polls from before the campaigns even really start that mean nothing at all….
I disagree WHOLE party numbers show shift when there is one. Whole numbers in the off year SHOW that shift. Person vs person means nothing now but party vs party DOES.That is irrelevant – the ‘numbers’ are little more than a starting point and will look nothing like this in a year when the polls start to mean something.
That is irrelevant – the ‘numbers’ are little more than a starting point and will look nothing like this in a year when the polls start to mean something.
30% of the people will vote democrat no matter what and 30% will vote GOP for the same reason. The remaining 40% is what is in play. THAT you find in the shift much like 2014.That is irrelevant – the ‘numbers’ are little more than a starting point and will look nothing like this in a year when the polls start to mean something.
The starting point was when she held double digit leads....they have evaporated
Indeed, but this has go to be worrying:More polls from before the campaigns even really start that mean nothing at all….
Of course. She has not launched her sleeze campaign yet though and that WILL damage the frontrunner whoever that is.Indeed, but this has go to be worrying:More polls from before the campaigns even really start that mean nothing at all….
"Bush, who's yet to officially enter the race, has staged an 18-point turnaround since February. He now leads Clinton by a margin of 47 percent to 41 percent; Clinton led in February by a margin of 51 percent to 39 percent.
Paul also turned around his fortunes from February, when he trailed by 10 percentage points, and now leads Clinton 47 percent to 43 percent.
Rubio leads Clinton by 5 percentage points, 47 percent to 42 percent, while Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker ties her, with 44 percent each."
An 18% turnaround doesn't just happen and cannot be just a statistical anomaly. Sleaze is catching up with Hillary, and multiple investigations into email deletions, her foundation and of course Benghazi are going to be in the news for some time to come.
Rwers are humorous believing they have anyone that can defeat Clinton. Y'all will just have to spend the next two terms transferring the hate you spewed on Obama onto Hillary. She will win a lot bigger than her predecessor.
Rwers are humorous believing they have anyone that can defeat Clinton. Y'all will just have to spend the next two terms transferring the hate you spewed on Obama onto Hillary. She will win a lot bigger than her predecessor.
I tend to agree, but getting the electorate excited about her is going to be very important. The reason Dems got ripped in the midterms the past two elections is that they didn't get their base and other voters excited, so they didn't vote. Generally in presidential election years that is not a problem but still, Dems will have to make sure that voters show up to vote. 2012 was interesting because I did some volunteer work for Obama in Ohio. Ohio was supposed to be really close and Republicans definitely thought they were going to win it, but all of Obama's people in Ohio said that Obama had it in the bag so long as everyone made it to the polls. Obama had the numbers; he just had to make sure they all actually voted. On election day, we hit every committed voter's house three to four times until we had confirmed that they had voted. Obama had one Hell of a ground game. Hillary will be smart to try to duplicate that.
Rwers are humorous believing they have anyone that can defeat Clinton. Y'all will just have to spend the next two terms transferring the hate you spewed on Obama onto Hillary. She will win a lot bigger than her predecessor.
I tend to agree, but getting the electorate excited about her is going to be very important. The reason Dems got ripped in the midterms the past two elections is that they didn't get their base and other voters excited, so they didn't vote. Generally in presidential election years that is not a problem but still, Dems will have to make sure that voters show up to vote. 2012 was interesting because I did some volunteer work for Obama in Ohio. Ohio was supposed to be really close and Republicans definitely thought they were going to win it, but all of Obama's people in Ohio said that Obama had it in the bag so long as everyone made it to the polls. Obama had the numbers; he just had to make sure they all actually voted. On election day, we hit every committed voter's house three to four times until we had confirmed that they had voted. Obama had one Hell of a ground game. Hillary will be smart to try to duplicate that.
Something Hillary had better work on are her facial expressions. She does this one thing in particular that is visually offensive. When she is confronted she bugs her eyes out. It makes her look demented and evil. Her handlers need to point that out to her. Keep those lids down girl. You are scaring the help!
The WMUR Granite State poll, conducted by the University of New Hampshire survey center, gives Clinton a huge lead over the Democratic field but shows her lagging former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Sens. Marco Rubio and Rand Paul by anywhere from 6-4 points. Check the numbers at the link below.
NH Poll Clinton trails GOP challengers - CNNPolitics.com
