"Hillary Clinton’s Email Scandal Continues with Huma Abedin In Spotlight"

[flacaltenn]

One thing's for certain.. An immunized person can be COMPELLED to testify.. And that's dangerous enough. Because any NEW perjuries or lying they commit constitutes an "uncovered independent" matter... So the computer tech and her aides can be compelled to give further testimony even if they have their own immunity deals....

"One thing's for certain.. An immunized person can be COMPELLED to testify"

LOL

Who said otherwise?

What remains unproven, is the claim a judge can revoke an immunity deal.

Mueller just revoked Comey's immunity and for all practical purposes special counsels are pretty much judge and jury.. Especially with the bogus plea deals that Mueller came up with in multiple cases where he added charges that had ZERO CHANCE of being proven at trial....

Holyfuckingshit!

When did Mueller become a judge??

When he starts weighing in on whether on Trump was "exonerated" or not for starters.. The legal system doesn't grant exonerations unless you were proven guilty and later reversed...

But when he indicted the 13 Russian trolls KNOWING the case would never see a courtroom, you can pad all the all goofy evidence you want to make yourself look manly... Or stick in an indictment in the Cohen matter that is POLITICALLY important but would probably get tossed on pre-trial motions....

Nope, that still doesn't make him a judge. It also doesn't show judges can revoke an immunity deal.

In cases under DOJ jurisdiction, no judge can revoke properly granted immunity.. BUT APPARENTLY, the Attorney General might be able to -- even if it was given thru special counsel....

9-23.000 - Witness Immunity

9-23.400 - AUTHORIZATION TO PROSECUTE AFTER COMPULSION
After a person has testified or provided information pursuant to a compulsion order—except in the case of act-of-production immunity—an attorney for the government shall not initiate or recommend prosecution of the person for an offense or offenses first disclosed in, or closely related to, such testimony or information without the express written authorization of the Attorney General. Such requests for authorization should be sent to the Assistant Attorney General for the division that issued the letter of authority for requesting the original compulsion order.

The request to prosecute should indicate the circumstances justifying prosecution and the method by which the government will be able to establish that the evidence it will use against the witness will meet the government's burden under Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972).

 

[Faun]

"One thing's for certain.. An immunized person can be COMPELLED to testify"

LOL

Who said otherwise?

What remains unproven, is the claim a judge can revoke an immunity deal.

Mueller just revoked Comey's immunity and for all practical purposes special counsels are pretty much judge and jury.. Especially with the bogus plea deals that Mueller came up with in multiple cases where he added charges that had ZERO CHANCE of being proven at trial....

Holyfuckingshit!

When did Mueller become a judge??

When he starts weighing in on whether on Trump was "exonerated" or not for starters.. The legal system doesn't grant exonerations unless you were proven guilty and later reversed...

But when he indicted the 13 Russian trolls KNOWING the case would never see a courtroom, you can pad all the all goofy evidence you want to make yourself look manly... Or stick in an indictment in the Cohen matter that is POLITICALLY important but would probably get tossed on pre-trial motions....

Nope, that still doesn't make him a judge. It also doesn't show judges can revoke an immunity deal.

In cases under DOJ jurisdiction, no judge can revoke properly granted immunity.. BUT APPARENTLY, the Attorney General might be able to -- even if it was given thru special counsel....

9-23.000 - Witness Immunity

9-23.400 - AUTHORIZATION TO PROSECUTE AFTER COMPULSION
After a person has testified or provided information pursuant to a compulsion order—except in the case of act-of-production immunity—an attorney for the government shall not initiate or recommend prosecution of the person for an offense or offenses first disclosed in, or closely related to, such testimony or information without the express written authorization of the Attorney General. Such requests for authorization should be sent to the Assistant Attorney General for the division that issued the letter of authority for requesting the original compulsion order.

The request to prosecute should indicate the circumstances justifying prosecution and the method by which the government will be able to establish that the evidence it will use against the witness will meet the government's burden under Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972).

WTF is wrong with you? You keep arguing a point no one is contesting. What was contested was the claim that a judge can revoke an immunity deal offered by a prosecutor.

 

[flacaltenn]

Mueller just revoked Comey's immunity and for all practical purposes special counsels are pretty much judge and jury.. Especially with the bogus plea deals that Mueller came up with in multiple cases where he added charges that had ZERO CHANCE of being proven at trial....

Holyfuckingshit!

When did Mueller become a judge??

When he starts weighing in on whether on Trump was "exonerated" or not for starters.. The legal system doesn't grant exonerations unless you were proven guilty and later reversed...

But when he indicted the 13 Russian trolls KNOWING the case would never see a courtroom, you can pad all the all goofy evidence you want to make yourself look manly... Or stick in an indictment in the Cohen matter that is POLITICALLY important but would probably get tossed on pre-trial motions....

Nope, that still doesn't make him a judge. It also doesn't show judges can revoke an immunity deal.

In cases under DOJ jurisdiction, no judge can revoke properly granted immunity.. BUT APPARENTLY, the Attorney General might be able to -- even if it was given thru special counsel....

9-23.000 - Witness Immunity

9-23.400 - AUTHORIZATION TO PROSECUTE AFTER COMPULSION
After a person has testified or provided information pursuant to a compulsion order—except in the case of act-of-production immunity—an attorney for the government shall not initiate or recommend prosecution of the person for an offense or offenses first disclosed in, or closely related to, such testimony or information without the express written authorization of the Attorney General. Such requests for authorization should be sent to the Assistant Attorney General for the division that issued the letter of authority for requesting the original compulsion order.

The request to prosecute should indicate the circumstances justifying prosecution and the method by which the government will be able to establish that the evidence it will use against the witness will meet the government's burden under Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 (1972).

WTF is wrong with you? You keep arguing a point no one is contesting. What was contested was the claim that a judge can revoke an immunity deal offered by a prosecutor.

I never bought the "judge" thing.. Just trying to set the boundaries on what COULD happen... And of course you who KNOWS all this for sure could have done the work and shed some light instead of spit wads....

 

[Care4all]

Yeah, well she was always the fox in charge of the investigation into her hen house raids.

Where did she get ALL of this power you claim she has had all of these 30 plus years? Why have you picked her to be the Boogeyman for everything?

If she had so much power, as you claim.... why did Comey intentionally F- her, with his two press conferences/announcements, during the campaign period?

Comey didn't indict her, which he should have done for her multiple violations of the Espionage Act.

So no, he didn't screw her.

She and her Foundation took in 175 million dollars, and according to the Foundations tax filings for 2014, they only gave 4 percent to charity. So you tell me, she has been in, and around government for 40 years, and she has zero to show for it.

So you tell me, why do you support such an epic failure as she is?

yes yes let's go over all the phony scandals that nobody gives a crap about except super dupes like you. The Clinton foundation was the charity-- they had the people to spend the money in other countries. You are an idiot like so many. All of that was pure propaganda. Ignoramus.

What are you bleating about little hater dupe sheeple person?

The Clinton foundation was a pay to play operation. That is proven by the fact that after she lost the election they stopped getting multi million dollar donations...but sheep, like you, don't care.

Because you are little stupid hater dupes.

Don't you remember that during her campaign that Clinton said they were reducing the size of the foundation, and then going to pass the foundation to others not relating to themselves, so that no Clinton would be a part of the foundation charity?

Bill also merged then shuttered his Global Initiative part of the charity, during the campaign....

This is the main reason for the reduction in the charity.

Also, who got paid in your pay for play accusation?

NOT one penny went in to the Clinton's personal pockets? So exactly how in your pay for play scheme did Clinton get paid?

 

[easyt65]

Yes yes it's all a huge conspiracy of every news organization in the world except those owned by Rupert Murdoch. The French the British the Japanese the Indians etc etc all believe you are nuts too. Also all the law enforcement including our excellent law enforcement. You are all conspiracy nut jobs now great job GOP!

Bwuhahahaha....again, thank you for attempting to speak for everyone in the world....nutjob.

BTW, former fired FBI Director Comey thinks YOU are a LIAR!

After all, it was COMEY who testified under oath before Congress and in that testimony declared Hillary had LIED to Congress and had broken laws. It was Comey who publicly declared Hillary DID BREAK LAWS...right before making the false argument that 'ignorance is a legal defense for breaking the law' - specifically that Hillary was 'too stupid to know she was breaking laws'.

 

[westwall]

Yeah, well she was always the fox in charge of the investigation into her hen house raids.

Where did she get ALL of this power you claim she has had all of these 30 plus years? Why have you picked her to be the Boogeyman for everything?

If she had so much power, as you claim.... why did Comey intentionally F- her, with his two press conferences/announcements, during the campaign period?

Comey didn't indict her, which he should have done for her multiple violations of the Espionage Act.

So no, he didn't screw her.

She and her Foundation took in 175 million dollars, and according to the Foundations tax filings for 2014, they only gave 4 percent to charity. So you tell me, she has been in, and around government for 40 years, and she has zero to show for it.

So you tell me, why do you support such an epic failure as she is?

yes yes let's go over all the phony scandals that nobody gives a crap about except super dupes like you. The Clinton foundation was the charity-- they had the people to spend the money in other countries. You are an idiot like so many. All of that was pure propaganda. Ignoramus.

What are you bleating about little hater dupe sheeple person?

The Clinton foundation was a pay to play operation. That is proven by the fact that after she lost the election they stopped getting multi million dollar donations...but sheep, like you, don't care.

Because you are little stupid hater dupes.

Don't you remember that during her campaign that Clinton said they were reducing the size of the foundation, and then going to pass the foundation to others not relating to themselves, so that no Clinton would be a part of the foundation charity?

Bill also merged then shuttered his Global Initiative part of the charity, during the campaign....

This is the main reason for the reduction in the charity.

Also, who got paid in your pay for play accusation?

NOT one penny went in to the Clinton's personal pockets? So exactly how in your pay for play scheme did Clinton get paid?

No, the global initiative wasn't shut down till weeks after the election. Why? NO MONEY COMING IN ANYMORE!

Put simply, if they were a legit operation they would still be operating....especially after she lost because there would no longer be a need to separate the Foundation.

You're just wrong, Care.

 

[francoHFW]

Where did she get ALL of this power you claim she has had all of these 30 plus years? Why have you picked her to be the Boogeyman for everything?

If she had so much power, as you claim.... why did Comey intentionally F- her, with his two press conferences/announcements, during the campaign period?

Comey didn't indict her, which he should have done for her multiple violations of the Espionage Act.

So no, he didn't screw her.

She and her Foundation took in 175 million dollars, and according to the Foundations tax filings for 2014, they only gave 4 percent to charity. So you tell me, she has been in, and around government for 40 years, and she has zero to show for it.

So you tell me, why do you support such an epic failure as she is?

yes yes let's go over all the phony scandals that nobody gives a crap about except super dupes like you. The Clinton foundation was the charity-- they had the people to spend the money in other countries. You are an idiot like so many. All of that was pure propaganda. Ignoramus.

What are you bleating about little hater dupe sheeple person?

The Clinton foundation was a pay to play operation. That is proven by the fact that after she lost the election they stopped getting multi million dollar donations...but sheep, like you, don't care.

Because you are little stupid hater dupes.

Don't you remember that during her campaign that Clinton said they were reducing the size of the foundation, and then going to pass the foundation to others not relating to themselves, so that no Clinton would be a part of the foundation charity?

Bill also merged then shuttered his Global Initiative part of the charity, during the campaign....

This is the main reason for the reduction in the charity.

Also, who got paid in your pay for play accusation?

NOT one penny went in to the Clinton's personal pockets? So exactly how in your pay for play scheme did Clinton get paid?

No, the global initiative wasn't shut down till weeks after the election. Why? NO MONEY COMING IN ANYMORE!

Put simply, if they were a legit operation they would still be operating....especially after she lost because there would no longer be a need to separate the Foundation.

You're just wrong, Care.

Zzzzzzzzzzz. All investigated and no evidence they were doing anything as a quid pro quo. It would have gone on like that forever.... Because guess what, there is no evidence the Clintons were or are dishonest. Just 28 years of mountains of garbage propaganda, character assassination and conspiracy theories...

 

[westwall]

Comey didn't indict her, which he should have done for her multiple violations of the Espionage Act.

So no, he didn't screw her.

She and her Foundation took in 175 million dollars, and according to the Foundations tax filings for 2014, they only gave 4 percent to charity. So you tell me, she has been in, and around government for 40 years, and she has zero to show for it.

So you tell me, why do you support such an epic failure as she is?

yes yes let's go over all the phony scandals that nobody gives a crap about except super dupes like you. The Clinton foundation was the charity-- they had the people to spend the money in other countries. You are an idiot like so many. All of that was pure propaganda. Ignoramus.

What are you bleating about little hater dupe sheeple person?

The Clinton foundation was a pay to play operation. That is proven by the fact that after she lost the election they stopped getting multi million dollar donations...but sheep, like you, don't care.

Because you are little stupid hater dupes.

Don't you remember that during her campaign that Clinton said they were reducing the size of the foundation, and then going to pass the foundation to others not relating to themselves, so that no Clinton would be a part of the foundation charity?

Bill also merged then shuttered his Global Initiative part of the charity, during the campaign....

This is the main reason for the reduction in the charity.

Also, who got paid in your pay for play accusation?

NOT one penny went in to the Clinton's personal pockets? So exactly how in your pay for play scheme did Clinton get paid?

No, the global initiative wasn't shut down till weeks after the election. Why? NO MONEY COMING IN ANYMORE!

Put simply, if they were a legit operation they would still be operating....especially after she lost because there would no longer be a need to separate the Foundation.

You're just wrong, Care.

Zzzzzzzzzzz. All investigated and no evidence they were doing anything as a quid pro quo. It would have gone on like that forever.... Because guess what, there is no evidence the Clintons were or are dishonest. Just 28 years of mountains of garbage propaganda, character assassination and conspiracy theories...

Hammering a few Blackberries to pieces, so that they can't have evidence lifted from them, says otherwise.

 

[francoHFW]

yes yes let's go over all the phony scandals that nobody gives a crap about except super dupes like you. The Clinton foundation was the charity-- they had the people to spend the money in other countries. You are an idiot like so many. All of that was pure propaganda. Ignoramus.

What are you bleating about little hater dupe sheeple person?

The Clinton foundation was a pay to play operation. That is proven by the fact that after she lost the election they stopped getting multi million dollar donations...but sheep, like you, don't care.

Because you are little stupid hater dupes.

Don't you remember that during her campaign that Clinton said they were reducing the size of the foundation, and then going to pass the foundation to others not relating to themselves, so that no Clinton would be a part of the foundation charity?

Bill also merged then shuttered his Global Initiative part of the charity, during the campaign....

This is the main reason for the reduction in the charity.

Also, who got paid in your pay for play accusation?

NOT one penny went in to the Clinton's personal pockets? So exactly how in your pay for play scheme did Clinton get paid?

No, the global initiative wasn't shut down till weeks after the election. Why? NO MONEY COMING IN ANYMORE!

Put simply, if they were a legit operation they would still be operating....especially after she lost because there would no longer be a need to separate the Foundation.

You're just wrong, Care.

Zzzzzzzzzzz. All investigated and no evidence they were doing anything as a quid pro quo. It would have gone on like that forever.... Because guess what, there is no evidence the Clintons were or are dishonest. Just 28 years of mountains of garbage propaganda, character assassination and conspiracy theories...

Hammering a few Blackberries to pieces, so that they can't have evidence lifted from them, says otherwise.

All the secretaries of State destroy their old devices, super duper... Actually their security people do. Zzzzzzzz....

 

[jc456]

the lock up clinton crowd cracks me up-

you idiots might as well stick to birth certificates.

mine is the russia russia group

 

[westwall]

What are you bleating about little hater dupe sheeple person?

The Clinton foundation was a pay to play operation. That is proven by the fact that after she lost the election they stopped getting multi million dollar donations...but sheep, like you, don't care.

Because you are little stupid hater dupes.

Don't you remember that during her campaign that Clinton said they were reducing the size of the foundation, and then going to pass the foundation to others not relating to themselves, so that no Clinton would be a part of the foundation charity?

Bill also merged then shuttered his Global Initiative part of the charity, during the campaign....

This is the main reason for the reduction in the charity.

Also, who got paid in your pay for play accusation?

NOT one penny went in to the Clinton's personal pockets? So exactly how in your pay for play scheme did Clinton get paid?

No, the global initiative wasn't shut down till weeks after the election. Why? NO MONEY COMING IN ANYMORE!

Put simply, if they were a legit operation they would still be operating....especially after she lost because there would no longer be a need to separate the Foundation.

You're just wrong, Care.

Zzzzzzzzzzz. All investigated and no evidence they were doing anything as a quid pro quo. It would have gone on like that forever.... Because guess what, there is no evidence the Clintons were or are dishonest. Just 28 years of mountains of garbage propaganda, character assassination and conspiracy theories...

Hammering a few Blackberries to pieces, so that they can't have evidence lifted from them, says otherwise.

All the secretaries of State destroy their old devices, super duper... Actually their security people do. Zzzzzzzz....

No they don't you fucking retard. Especially when they are under subpoena you moronic half wit.

 

[francoHFW]

Don't you remember that during her campaign that Clinton said they were reducing the size of the foundation, and then going to pass the foundation to others not relating to themselves, so that no Clinton would be a part of the foundation charity?

Bill also merged then shuttered his Global Initiative part of the charity, during the campaign....

This is the main reason for the reduction in the charity.

Also, who got paid in your pay for play accusation?

NOT one penny went in to the Clinton's personal pockets? So exactly how in your pay for play scheme did Clinton get paid?

No, the global initiative wasn't shut down till weeks after the election. Why? NO MONEY COMING IN ANYMORE!

Put simply, if they were a legit operation they would still be operating....especially after she lost because there would no longer be a need to separate the Foundation.

You're just wrong, Care.

Zzzzzzzzzzz. All investigated and no evidence they were doing anything as a quid pro quo. It would have gone on like that forever.... Because guess what, there is no evidence the Clintons were or are dishonest. Just 28 years of mountains of garbage propaganda, character assassination and conspiracy theories...

Hammering a few Blackberries to pieces, so that they can't have evidence lifted from them, says otherwise.

All the secretaries of State destroy their old devices, super duper... Actually their security people do. Zzzzzzzz....

All investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there is no Scandal to cover up just idiotic propaganda.


No they don't you fucking retard. Especially when they are under subpoena you moronic half wit.

all investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there was never any Scandal to cover up in the first place, just 25 years of garbage propaganda.

 

[miketx]

SLOWLY, ever so slowly ALL the skells will be outed....I think late summer of 2020 would be the perfect time for a few dozen INDICTMENTS to be presented to the public 2 a week from August until early Nov.....just in time for the DeathRATS AND the MSM to lose their collective minds...ROTFLMFAO!!!!!"

Nothing will be done about it.

 

[francoHFW]

SLOWLY, ever so slowly ALL the skells will be outed....I think late summer of 2020 would be the perfect time for a few dozen INDICTMENTS to be presented to the public 2 a week from August until early Nov.....just in time for the DeathRATS AND the MSM to lose their collective minds...ROTFLMFAO!!!!!"

Nothing will be done about it.

Just another Secretary of State who didn't pay any attention to her technology, deleted her private emails, and destroyed her old electronic devices... zzzzzzzzzzz

 

[westwall]

No, the global initiative wasn't shut down till weeks after the election. Why? NO MONEY COMING IN ANYMORE!

Put simply, if they were a legit operation they would still be operating....especially after she lost because there would no longer be a need to separate the Foundation.

You're just wrong, Care.

Zzzzzzzzzzz. All investigated and no evidence they were doing anything as a quid pro quo. It would have gone on like that forever.... Because guess what, there is no evidence the Clintons were or are dishonest. Just 28 years of mountains of garbage propaganda, character assassination and conspiracy theories...

Hammering a few Blackberries to pieces, so that they can't have evidence lifted from them, says otherwise.

All the secretaries of State destroy their old devices, super duper... Actually their security people do. Zzzzzzzz....

All investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there is no Scandal to cover up just idiotic propaganda.


No they don't you fucking retard. Especially when they are under subpoena you moronic half wit.

all investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there was never any Scandal to cover up in the first place, just 25 years of garbage propaganda.

Only according to little brain washed hater dupes, like you.

 

[miketx]

SLOWLY, ever so slowly ALL the skells will be outed....I think late summer of 2020 would be the perfect time for a few dozen INDICTMENTS to be presented to the public 2 a week from August until early Nov.....just in time for the DeathRATS AND the MSM to lose their collective minds...ROTFLMFAO!!!!!"

Nothing will be done about it.

Just another Secretary of State who didn't pay any attention to her technology, deleted her private emails, and destroyed her old electronic devices... zzzzzzzzzzz

If you really think she is that stupid then you're more of an idiot than I first thought.

 

[francoHFW]

SLOWLY, ever so slowly ALL the skells will be outed....I think late summer of 2020 would be the perfect time for a few dozen INDICTMENTS to be presented to the public 2 a week from August until early Nov.....just in time for the DeathRATS AND the MSM to lose their collective minds...ROTFLMFAO!!!!!"

Nothing will be done about it.

Just another Secretary of State who didn't pay any attention to her technology, deleted her private emails, and destroyed her old electronic devices... zzzzzzzzzzz

If you really think she is that stupid then you're more of an idiot than I first thought.

she was Secretary of State and didn't give a s*** about email technology like every other secretary of state dingbat.... That was her staff's business...

 

[francoHFW]

Zzzzzzzzzzz. All investigated and no evidence they were doing anything as a quid pro quo. It would have gone on like that forever.... Because guess what, there is no evidence the Clintons were or are dishonest. Just 28 years of mountains of garbage propaganda, character assassination and conspiracy theories...

Hammering a few Blackberries to pieces, so that they can't have evidence lifted from them, says otherwise.

All the secretaries of State destroy their old devices, super duper... Actually their security people do. Zzzzzzzz....

All investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there is no Scandal to cover up just idiotic propaganda.


No they don't you fucking retard. Especially when they are under subpoena you moronic half wit.

all investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there was never any Scandal to cover up in the first place, just 25 years of garbage propaganda.

Only according to little brain washed hater dupes, like you.

Me and law enforcement and real journalism around the world...

 

[westwall]

Hammering a few Blackberries to pieces, so that they can't have evidence lifted from them, says otherwise.

All the secretaries of State destroy their old devices, super duper... Actually their security people do. Zzzzzzzz....

All investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there is no Scandal to cover up just idiotic propaganda.


No they don't you fucking retard. Especially when they are under subpoena you moronic half wit.

all investigated and explained, brainwashed functional moron. Plus there was never any Scandal to cover up in the first place, just 25 years of garbage propaganda.

Only according to little brain washed hater dupes, like you.

Me and law enforcement and real journalism around the world...

Comey laid out the crimes she committed, then declared she was too stupid to handle classified material properly.

Great choice you made there, dumbass hater dupe.

 

[francoHFW]

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzxzz