Vanquish
Vanquisher of shills
- Aug 14, 2009
- 2,663
- 358
- 98
This has already been addressed in other threads, but great job beating a dead horse.
Questioning this action is basically questioning the constitutionality of the FDA. Are you prepared to put forth a decent argument that the FDA isn't constitutional?
Because an organization is Constitutional does not mean every thing it does is for the benefit of the people it is supposed to be serving. Further because an organization is Constitutional does not preclude one from trying to stop them from implementing bad policy or law.
Nice attempt to deflect though. Ohh and provide links to all these other threads please.
Indeed. Being "Constitutional" doesn't give any position or organization unfettered power to do whatever it wants.
Where the FUCK did I say it did? I'm simply pointing out the crux of the fucking issue. Apparently everyone here wants to dance around singing zippidy-freaking-doda without actually drilling down to the real issues.
No, instead its more fun to get on your chicken little box and scream "THe government's fucking up" instead of looking at the mechanisms, critically, of how the salt thing is happening.
And yes, the FDA has made mistakes and isn't always right...but I dont see you discussing the constitutionality of the proposed restrictions...just general comments with no legal precedent or citation to authority. General, "fuck the dems" bullshit as usual.
Making this entire thread worthless.