☭proletarian☭;2107152 said:
It's about time someone began treating the birthers as the idiots that they are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
☭proletarian☭;2107152 said:
Wow... So Hawaii is considering passing a law tolegally ignore Requests of Information?
And all because the President of the US refuses to simply produce a Birth certificate...
LOL... Well that seems fairly transparent.
☭proletarian☭;2110582 said:☭proletarian☭;2110431 said:If Obama weren't a citizen, Hillary would have exposed him during the primaries.
Look, a black guy won-= just accept it and move on.
OH! That is a BEAUTFUL demonstration of post hoc reasoning! Which is an invalid logical construct and as such; with you being a Leftist; such demonstrates in SPADES, that Left-think is an Unsound Species of Reasoning.
Congrats...
lol
you don't know what post-hoc means
Interesting how this comes out after that English paper claimed the original birth certificate was burned in as fire long before Fuki whatever claims to have seen it.
Actually, the State of Hawaii has made Mr. Obama's Birth Certificate available. The "Certificate of Live Birth" is issued FOR ALL BIRTHS IN THE STATE OF HAWAII!!!
The "Certificate of Live Birth" is the Birth Certificate for all Babies born in Hawaii.
Now, on to next overblown, over rated lie please.
No. No. No. All that does is prove that Obama was born alive and in the state of Hawaii. What birthers are looking for is a birth certificate that proves he was born in the state of Hawaii... along with photographs, video, signed affidavits from atleast 1000000 people who witnessed Obamas birth, and for God (but only the Christian God of course) to have a press conference where it is affirmed by God that Obama was born in Hawaii.
Do you birthers not think there is a pretty extensive investigation into the candidates by the government prior to them becoming candidates?
In truth, the Certification of Live Birth does not prove that he was born in Hawaii... as was established in the citation of Hawaiin Legal code (noted above) which clearly establishes that such certificates were routinely issued to people who could establish to the subjective satisfaction of the registrar, that the applicant parent or gaurdian had estaboished Hawaiin domicile a minimum of one year prior to the birth of ADOPTION of a child which was NOT born in Hawaii.
SOooo... let it noted that the twaddle to which I am responding is summarily REFUTED, in finality.
Hawaii Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino issued statements last year and in October 2008 saying that she's seen vital records that prove Obama is a natural-born American citizen.
☭proletarian☭;2110582 said:OH! That is a BEAUTFUL demonstration of post hoc reasoning! Which is an invalid logical construct and as such; with you being a Leftist; such demonstrates in SPADES, that Left-think is an Unsound Species of Reasoning.
Congrats...
lol
you don't know what post-hoc means
No?
Well let's see...
"The post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this therefore because of this) fallacy is based upon the mistaken notion that simply because one thing happens after another, the first event was a cause of the second event. Post hoc reasoning is the basis for many superstitions and erroneous beliefs."
Thus where you claim that "If Obama weren't a citizen, Hillary would have exposed him during the primaries." you're claim is that: 'Because the Clinton Campaign did not expose that Hussein is not a Citizen; then Hussein is a Citizen..."
Which is to say that 'After the failure of Clinton to prove Hussein is not a citizen; therefore, this proves that Hussein is a citizen...
Seems pretty cut and dried there Karl...
Wow... So Hawaii is considering passing a law tolegally ignore Requests of Information?
And all because the President of the US refuses to simply produce a Birth certificate...
LOL... Well that seems fairly transparent.
I see you have a reading comprehension problem. You may want to try reading the article again.
☭proletarian☭;2110717 said:☭proletarian☭;2110582 said:☭proletarian☭;2110431 said:If Obama weren't a citizen, Hillary would have exposed him during the primaries.
Look, a black guy won-= just accept it and move on.
OH! That is a BEAUTFUL demonstration of post hoc reasoning! Which is an invalid logical construct and as such; with you being a Leftist; such demonstrates in SPADES, that Left-think is an Unsound Species of Reasoning.
Congrats...
lol
you don't know what post-hoc means
No?
Well let's see...
"The post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this therefore because of this) fallacy is based upon the mistaken notion that simply because one thing happens after another, the first event was a cause of the second event. Post hoc reasoning is the basis for many superstitions and erroneous beliefs."
Thus where you claim that "If Obama weren't a citizen, Hillary would have exposed him during the primaries." you're claim is that: 'Because the Clinton Campaign did not expose that Hussein is not a Citizen; then Hussein is a Citizen..."
Which is to say that 'After the failure of Clinton to prove Hussein is not a citizen; therefore, this proves that Hussein is a citizen...
Seems pretty cut and dried there Karl...
How does someone quote a definition and still not get it?
If you're saying that A (obama being born in Hawaii) was not caused by B (Hillary not exposing him)-- then you've admitted he was born in Hawaii and have just argued that his being born in Hawaii occurred independent of Hillary's actions.
☭proletarian☭;2110431 said:If Obama weren't a citizen, Hillary would have exposed him during the primaries. ... .
We're not speaking in IF's
the debate is over;
☭proletarian☭;2110834 said:We're not speaking in IF's
Oh, so you weren't posing 'if Obama was born in Hawaii', you were stating that he was, in fact, born in Hawaii.
Good to know you've come to your senses.
You've still yet to use post-hoc correctly, by the way
.the debate is over;
Good to know you've come to your senses and moved past your sad racist xenophobia.
Wow... So Hawaii is considering passing a law tolegally ignore Requests of Information?
And all because the President of the US refuses to simply produce a Birth certificate...
LOL... Well that seems fairly transparent.
I see you have a reading comprehension problem. You may want to try reading the article again.
ROFL... Oh.... so you feel like you can just project a failure on the part of your opposition to adequately comprehend the issue; and that this somehow establishes that the opposition suffers inadequate comprehension skills...
Oh wouldn't it be nice for you if such were anywhere close to true... I mean, were the the case; THAT would really be such a strong argument...
☭proletarian☭;2110717 said:☭proletarian☭;2110582 said:lol
you don't know what post-hoc means
No?
Well let's see...
"The post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this therefore because of this) fallacy is based upon the mistaken notion that simply because one thing happens after another, the first event was a cause of the second event. Post hoc reasoning is the basis for many superstitions and erroneous beliefs."
Thus where you claim that "If Obama weren't a citizen, Hillary would have exposed him during the primaries." you're claim is that: 'Because the Clinton Campaign did not expose that Hussein is not a Citizen; then Hussein is a Citizen..."
Which is to say that 'After the failure of Clinton to prove Hussein is not a citizen; therefore, this proves that Hussein is a citizen...
Seems pretty cut and dried there Karl...
How does someone quote a definition and still not get it?
If you're saying that A (obama being born in Hawaii) was not caused by B (Hillary not exposing him)-- then you've admitted he was born in Hawaii and have just argued that his being born in Hawaii occurred independent of Hillary's actions.
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to beowolfe again.
☭proletarian☭;2111037 said:You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to beowolfe again.
dammit
"If Obama weren't a citizen, Hillary would have exposed him during the primaries."
I see you have a reading comprehension problem. You may want to try reading the article again.
ROFL... Oh.... so you feel like you can just project a failure on the part of your opposition to adequately comprehend the issue; and that this somehow establishes that the opposition suffers inadequate comprehension skills...
Oh wouldn't it be nice for you if such were anywhere close to true... I mean, were the the case; THAT would really be such a strong argument...
You state that Hawii is considering a law to 'legally ignore Requests for informtion'. That's not what their law proposes. It proposes to 'legally ignore' people who keep requesting the same information over and over after they have already been given a response.
Yeah needs freedom of speech anyhow.