Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM
http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM
http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/
Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:
XXXXX
Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:
“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.
“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”
“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”
Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html
Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:
Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM
Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM
Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments