Harder to Cheat In WI.

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2011
59,691
53,022
3,600
I guess being a citizen means nothing to the Democrats. Absentee ballots without signatures? Really?

Washington D.C.-based law firm Elias Law Group, led by Democrat attorney and Russian collusion hoaxer Marc Elias, failed to convince a federal judge in a recent case challenging Wisconsinā€™s election integrity laws. The firmā€™s argument, which the presiding judge termed ā€œhead-scratching,ā€ sought to challenge the stateā€™s statute mandating that a U.S. citizen must witness and sign an absentee voterā€™s ballot. According to Elias Law Group, this infringed upon voting and civil rights.

Presiding over the case was U.S. District Court Chief Judge James D. Peterson, an Obama-appointed judge. He dismissed the petition against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, expressing his consternation at the claims, insinuating that they lacked logic and soundness.









ā€œThe absurd results to which plaintiffsā€™ interpretation would lead are reason enough to reject that interpretation,ā€ Peterson wrote. ā€œIt is plaintiffsā€™ interpretation that leads to head-scratching results.ā€

 
I guess being a citizen means nothing to the Democrats. Absentee ballots without signatures? Really?

Washington D.C.-based law firm Elias Law Group, led by Democrat attorney and Russian collusion hoaxer Marc Elias, failed to convince a federal judge in a recent case challenging Wisconsinā€™s election integrity laws. The firmā€™s argument, which the presiding judge termed ā€œhead-scratching,ā€ sought to challenge the stateā€™s statute mandating that a U.S. citizen must witness and sign an absentee voterā€™s ballot. According to Elias Law Group, this infringed upon voting and civil rights.

Presiding over the case was U.S. District Court Chief Judge James D. Peterson, an Obama-appointed judge. He dismissed the petition against the Wisconsin Elections Commission, expressing his consternation at the claims, insinuating that they lacked logic and soundness.









ā€œThe absurd results to which plaintiffsā€™ interpretation would lead are reason enough to reject that interpretation,ā€ Peterson wrote. ā€œIt is plaintiffsā€™ interpretation that leads to head-scratching results.ā€


The DNC stated that an accurate voter database was an "existential threat"

They need to cheat to survive
 

Forum List

Back
Top