RDD_1210
Forms his own opinions
- May 13, 2010
- 18,981
- 1,817
- 265
Dems need to run on a 90% tax on all income in excess of $50,000 and an undistributed profits tax.
Why would they do that? That's dumb.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dems need to run on a 90% tax on all income in excess of $50,000 and an undistributed profits tax.
Dems need to run on a 90% tax on all income in excess of $50,000 and an undistributed profits tax.
Dems need to run on a 90% tax on all income in excess of $50,000 and an undistributed profits tax.
Why would they do that? That's dumb.
And, if both [arties are to blame, as you say,m then why the constant calls that it is the GOP that caused the mess? Fence sit much?
And please tell us your views on Frank and Dodd's role in all of this... as well as CRA, red-lining, etc.
Bush supporters should be praising Obama, Bush haters should be attacking Obama.
Why is the opposite happening?
And, if both [arties are to blame, as you say,m then why the constant calls that it is the GOP that caused the mess? Fence sit much?
And please tell us your views on Frank and Dodd's role in all of this... as well as CRA, red-lining, etc.
so youre against Dodd Frank because it brought back regulations on the banks to prevent another collapse? and who was it that deregulated the financial markets? Bush and the GOP controlled congress.
Panel blames deregulation for financial crisis - Business - US business - msnbc.com
it also caps debit card transactions for businesses, regulates derivatives, sets new rules for credit card rates so they cant gouge us, or im sure you prefer a 29.9% interest rate on the credit card as well as if you miss 1 payment they can jack it up on you. im sure thats terrible as well. its called consumer protection. but in the free market, the banks would just charge whatever rate they want, wait oh thats right they have been doing that for years.
Bush supporters should be praising Obama, Bush haters should be attacking Obama.
Why is the opposite happening?
I attacked Obama when he sold out on the tax cuts. Lack of guts on his part and he blinked
Blastoff beat me to it, these are now the Bush/Obama cuts.
Whether you agree with them or not, Bush and Obama are in agreement with the cuts.
Another issue you partisans should be holding hands about, rather than pretending to be different.
they are the Bush / GOP cuts. Obama has to concede and accept to temporarily extend those tax rates in order to get unemployment benefits extended. thats called compromise.
Dems need to run on a 90% tax on all income in excess of $50,000 and an undistributed profits tax.
Why would they do that? That's dumb.
Dumb? Why do you think people should be allowed to keep so much money for themselves?
Bush supporters should be praising Obama, Bush haters should be attacking Obama.
Why is the opposite happening?
I attacked Obama when he sold out on the tax cuts. Lack of guts on his part and he blinked
Yeah, but you don't have the nads to call it the Bush/Obama tax cuts.
And, if both [arties are to blame, as you say,m then why the constant calls that it is the GOP that caused the mess? Fence sit much?
And please tell us your views on Frank and Dodd's role in all of this... as well as CRA, red-lining, etc.
so youre against Dodd Frank because it brought back regulations on the banks to prevent another collapse? and who was it that deregulated the financial markets? Bush and the GOP controlled congress.
Panel blames deregulation for financial crisis - Business - US business - msnbc.com
it also caps debit card transactions for businesses, regulates derivatives, sets new rules for credit card rates so they cant gouge us, or im sure you prefer a 29.9% interest rate on the credit card as well as if you miss 1 payment they can jack it up on you. im sure thats terrible as well. its called consumer protection. but in the free market, the banks would just charge whatever rate they want, wait oh thats right they have been doing that for years.
I assume you are talking about the "1999 Financial Services Modernization Act" signed into law by William Jefferson Clinton?
What are your thoughts on the Dems screeching foul when Bush warned them on Freddie and Fannie in 2003?
What about the repeal of Glass-Steagall?
Why would the corps hire when they can make money off of tax cuts?
Uhm, like I don't even know what this means.
TRICKLE DOWN theory economics is nonsense when the problem is NOT on the supply side.
And of course when BUSH II's tax cuts for billionaires policies happened, the problems were NOT on the SUPPLY SIDE.
FWIW, they're STILL not on the SUPPLY side.
Private industry is sitting on something like 14 TRILLION dollars they could invest into supply side if there was a DEMAND side that made such investments woth their time.
What we need is a REAL Keynesian response.
Instead we got OBAMA's continuation of BUSH II's trickle down bullshit.