BolshevikHunter
Rookie
- Banned
- #21
Vaccines are money losers for pharmaceuticals.
Lifestyle drugs like viagra are the money makers.
For the same reason that dermatologists make a shit ton of money more than internists.
Umm, Excuse me geauxtohell, but do you care to elaborate on that assumption? How can "Lifestyle drugs", which are a choice, be more profitable than a Vaccine, which are usually (or quickly all becoming) mandatory? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Not trying to attack you, Just wondering bro? ~BH
I thought I'd point out that with something like Viagra, money is spent on a regular basis for it, whereas a vaccine would be taken/purchased far less frequently. That would explain something like Viagra being more of a money-maker.
That is a very good point my friend, but if we are talking all vaccines, then I am not too sure because many are required annually. The required amount of vaccines on newborn infants alone comes to a very high number. In the first year or two almost every single visit has a required vaccine, or should I say vaccines. Funny thing is, they test there effects on the body of only one single vaccine, not the combined 3 or 4 that usually are given all at once. The recent whooping cough vaccine, TDAP, Which is for whooping, tetanus and one other that I can't remember, is given to a 12 year old all at once. In California, you're child cannot attend Jr. High without a doctors varification of have given the shots.
Anyway, My Son had a very severe allergic reaction where he had hives that look like he had chicken pocks for 3 or 4 days even though he already had chicken pocks, and it was found that he was allergic to the combined drugs. Nevertheless, Your original point is a good arguement in regards to the profit levels. ~BH
Last edited: