Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Democratic House was led by a woman since 2007 and now is led by an African American man. Your shame regarding the lack of diversity in the GOP is noted where the whitest guy in America took over a dozens ballots to be elected.We would already know him if white entitlement hadn't exerted its party privilege while we had the majority...right now he is right where the parties white power structure wants him, in the minority so they can put a minority face on racial disharmony when they [white liberals] stir it up and still be able to claim they have elevated him...nothing new here.
yeah, which is the problem, it's called tokenism...Jefferies should have been majority leader. but whitey has his/her/they privilege and now ya got a minority face right where ya want him, in a position of minority leader where he can be used as a minority shield for white liberals...we should "have heard of Jefferies" long before this...[no offense to Nancy]Democratic House was led by a woman since 2007 and now is led by an African American man.
why is it my shame? lemme hear ya say Jefferies did or did not deserve the job before this...your inability to confirm this will prove my pointYour shame regarding the lack of diversity in the GOP is noted where the whitest guy in America took over a dozens ballots to be elected.
And yet whitey got the job of Majority leader...you have no shame...Nancy is a good person and a capable leader, but she can't hold Hakeem's gavel...he got jobbed by whites like yourself...but what else is new?Jefferies has been a rising star and recently held the important leadership roles as a chair for the policy committee and communications.
Jefferies deserves the job as evidence from a unanimous support by the elected congressional democrats. Nancy was a historically effective leader so I am not sure how you consider her a token or suggest she should have been ousted earlier. I am hoping Jefferies serves and runs for the white house.yeah, which is the problem, it's called tokenism...Jefferies should have been majority leader. but whitey has his/her/they privilege and now ya got a minority face right where ya want him, in a position of minority leader where he can be used as a minority shield for white liberals...we should "have heard of Jefferies" long before this...[no offense to Nancy]
why is it my shame? lemme hear ya say Jefferies did or did not deserve the job before this...your inability to confirm this will prove my point
And yet whitey got the job of Majority leader...you have no shame...Nancy is a good person and a capable leader, but she can't hold Hakeem's gavel...he got jobbed by whites like yourself...but what else is new?
geez, he deserved the job of majority leader over Nancy so of course he deserves this job...I'm sure you agreeJefferies deserves the job as evidence from a unanimous support by the elected congressional democrats.
Jefferies got the token position of minority leader not Nancy, now that we do not control the house mighty whitey at the top of the party lets Jefferies lead the party and they/white liberals now have a minority face to hide behind when stirring the racial pot.Nancy was a historically effective leader so I am not sure how you consider her a token or suggest she should have been ousted earlier.
unless of course he gets primaried by Nancy or someone like her...right?I am hoping Jefferies serves and runs for the white house.
Why would you assume he won’t keep it until he no longer wants it? I suggest you see what happens.geez, he deserved the job of majority leader over Nancy so of course he deserves this job...I'm sure you agree
Jefferies got the token position of minority leader not Nancy, now that we do not control the house mighty whitey at the top of the party lets Jefferies lead the party and they/white liberals now have a minority face to hide behind when stirring the racial pot.
unless of course he gets primaried by Nancy or someone like her...right?
Jeffries really had the power shoveler working last night. Literally everything he said in his sanctimonious flowery fantasy speech was exactly the OPPOSITE OF WHAT DEMOCRATS DO EVERY DAY. They think the only thing that matters is pretty words, as long as you say the pretty words you can be as sniveling, race baiting, divisive, and hateful as you want. Just say the pretty words. Hey Jeffries read this!
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries’ ABCs of American Values: “The Constitution over the cult …Freedom over fascism… Maturity over Mar-a-Lago…”
Near the end of his inspiring 15-minute address to the 118th Congress before the formal handing-over of the gavel to the newly elected Speaker of the House early Saturday morning, Minority Leader R…newyorktheater.me
Why would you assume he won’t keep it until he no longer wants it? I suggest you see what happens.
Time to scrap the social education curriculum
Jefferies deserves the job as evidence from a unanimous support by the elected congressional democrats. Nancy was a historically effective leader so I am not sure how you consider her a token or suggest she should have been ousted earlier. I am hoping Jefferies serves and runs for the white house.
He never denied elections were accurate. He complained about GOP dirty tricks. Link your quote below so I can kick the shit out of you with it.Why are you supporting an election denier? Why do you hate our democracy?
He never denied elections were accurate. He complained about GOP dirty tricks. Link your quote below so I can kick the shit out of you with it.
….it shows how ignorant the average American is.I look at these people on the Left and wonder how in the hell are they getting elected? If they ever gain control of the House, Senate, and WH, this country is fucked.
Nowhere does he challenge the integrity of the election. He is saying the Republicans used dirty tricks and russian help on the public swaying opinion. Had he known the GOP was going to full on start challenging the integrity of elections he would have used different words. Back then no one disputed that Trump won the electoral vote in a free and accurate election. They challenged whether the public was misinformed when they went into the voting booth. Just like no one is disputing that Santos won the most votes in NY for congress... they dispute whether the public was misinformed making their choice.Start with this one...
Nowhere does he challenge the integrity of the election. He is saying the Republicans used dirty tricks and russian help on the public swaying opinion. Had he known the GOP was going to full on start challenging the integrity of elections he would have used different words. Back then no one disputed that Trump won the electoral vote in a free and accurate election. They challenged whether the public was misinformed when they went into the voting booth. Just like no one is disputing that Santos won the most votes in NY for congress... they dispute whether the public was misinformed making their choice.
I dont expect you to grasp the difference... since GOP supporters are the lowest common denominator when it comes to nuance.
Jeffries is da man! And don't you forget it!Jeffries really had the power shoveler working last night. Literally everything he said in his sanctimonious flowery fantasy speech was exactly the OPPOSITE OF WHAT DEMOCRATS DO EVERY DAY. They think the only thing that matters is pretty words, as long as you say the pretty words you can be as sniveling, race baiting, divisive, and hateful as you want. Just say the pretty words. Hey Jeffries read this!
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries’ ABCs of American Values: “The Constitution over the cult …Freedom over fascism… Maturity over Mar-a-Lago…”
Near the end of his inspiring 15-minute address to the 118th Congress before the formal handing-over of the gavel to the newly elected Speaker of the House early Saturday morning, Minority Leader R…
Like I said you’re the lowest common denominator of anti-intellectual thinking. The difference between saying Trump got foreign help with misinformation campaign is light years different from the wacky claim that the voting machines and ballots and people are crooked and have produced the wrong result.You're an idiot. He says very clearly he believes the 2016 election was illegitimate (just like you claimed).
Both of you are election deniers and threats to our democracy.
Like I said you’re the lowest common denominator of anti-intellectual thinking. The difference between saying Trump got foreign help with misinformation campaign is light years different from the wacky claim that the voting machines and ballots and people are crooked and have produced the wrong result.
You my friend are stupid.
Santos is an illegitimate congressman. He defrauded the electorate with his lying stories of who he is. The votes were legally cast and tabulated accurately. There was no fraud by the system. Only the candidate.Jeffries stated he believes the 2016 election was illegitimate. He's an election denier, just like you.
Santos is an illegitimate congressman. He defrauded the electorate with his lying stories of who he is. The votes were legally cast and tabulated accurately. There was no fraud by the system. Only the candidate.
Now replace Santos with Trump and it’s the same.
