Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
To me it is despicable to deny Constitutional rights to people otherwise considered adults based upon age discrimination.
If you can kill your child on demand in that age group and you can serve in the military you sure as hell should be afforded your basic Constitutional rights.
Or if we are going to set that precedent, then let's up the voting age to 24 years old. I'm sure the Democrats would have no problem with that.
That would keep all these confused college kids that have been brainwashed by their stupid bat shit crazy Marxists professors from voting for Democrats.
If you cna't enjoy your constitutional rights as an adult why should you be allowed to vote for the Liberals that took away your rights?
If you are between the ages of 17 - 21 and are following all these gun control threads, there is something I would like you to consider. This isn't a debate, it's a political / legal reality so bear with me.
All of these retail establishments along with the president have decided that until you're 21 you should not own a firearm. What strikes me as odd here is that at 17 you can sign up and go into the military and defend this country, but it's another FOUR YEARS before the government thinks you ought to be able to defend your own life.
If you don't like that, you should urge all those in your age group to boycott the military until Uncle Scam gets his head out of his ..........
Virtually every election cycle when Republicans gain any power, the media and the Democrats sensationalize someone else's misery in order to sell gun control and force the Republicans to sign major gun legislation that ultimately accomplishes NOTHING.
* Under Reagan, he signed a bill to outlaw the future manufacture of fully autos for civilian use - and NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA HAD DIED FROM A BULLET FIRED FROM A LEGAL FULL AUTO.
* Behind him was George Bush who banned the importation of foreign made semi-automatic firearms
* George W. Bush said he would have extended the AWB put into place by Clinton, but Congress did not give him that luxury
* Today a nitwit, double talking traitor has promised the Democrats the sun, the moon and the stars on the gun control issue - even advocating circumventing Due Process do it!!!
Every time there is a catastrophe, the Ds and Rs do their song and dance routine over gun control and every time it ends with the Ds getting compromises and more gun control. The problem is, IT DON'T SAVE LIVES.
None of the pabulum puking political propaganda prostitutes from EITHER side has informed you that IF the current laws had been followed, Adam Lanza (who committed the Sandy Hook murders) along with Nickolas Cruz would have been stopped BEFORE the carnage began. The laws were in place, but the cops didn't do their job; the county school system didn't do its job; the FBI didn't do their job. And yet NOBODY with the county faces accountability, the cop who turned tail and ran faces no accountability (Hell he gets to retire and draw a pension); the FBI gets off scott free! Why pass more laws if they don't use the current ones to prevent this crap?
Then they single out those between 17 and 21, the NRA, Republicans, conservatives and everyone else that IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. It is time for gun owners to go on the offensive and offer ways to address the issue without gun control and those of you 17 - 21 could boycott joining the armed forces until the gun control hysteria stops and the government holds those who allowed the mass shootings to happen be held accountable AND consider the proposals that would reduce gun violence without infringing on our Rights. No point in serving a country that won't serve you, but throw you under the bus instead of admitting what the world should know.
Had the government done their jobs under existing law, those children would still be alive. You should not be held accountable for the government's failure to simply do their job.
Well they banned them having alcohol too.... it's what the US does. These people think they're wise because they're older, and they're not.
The right to keep and drink alcohol... which Amendment is that?
Put that same sign up in the UK, and it'll not make any difference. Why? Because guns aren't a problem in the UK.
No, it's because they are much less diverse than the US.....for now.
We took all the recreational narcotics away in the US, and the problem is worse now than ever. We have laws against entering or staying in this country illegally, and now there are 11 million or more of those people here.
I'm sure in the UK, people don't want guns. If there is no desire to have them, then it won't be an issue. But that will never be the case here because the criminals will always want guns, and they will get them. Disarming the good guys will only make it worse.
Put that same sign up in the UK, and it'll not make any difference. Why? Because guns aren't a problem in the UK.
No, it's because they are much less diverse than the US.....for now.
We took all the recreational narcotics away in the US, and the problem is worse now than ever. We have laws against entering or staying in this country illegally, and now there are 11 million or more of those people here.
I'm sure in the UK, people don't want guns. If there is no desire to have them, then it won't be an issue. But that will never be the case here because the criminals will always want guns, and they will get them. Disarming the good guys will only make it worse.
Nothing to do with diversity, but hey, your gun mag told you so, so you keep on believing Ray, reality just ain't for you.
If you are between the ages of 17 - 21 and are following all these gun control threads, there is something I would like you to consider. This isn't a debate, it's a political / legal reality so bear with me.
All of these retail establishments along with the president have decided that until you're 21 you should not own a firearm. What strikes me as odd here is that at 17 you can sign up and go into the military and defend this country, but it's another FOUR YEARS before the government thinks you ought to be able to defend your own life.
If you don't like that, you should urge all those in your age group to boycott the military until Uncle Scam gets his head out of his ..........
Virtually every election cycle when Republicans gain any power, the media and the Democrats sensationalize someone else's misery in order to sell gun control and force the Republicans to sign major gun legislation that ultimately accomplishes NOTHING.
* Under Reagan, he signed a bill to outlaw the future manufacture of fully autos for civilian use - and NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA HAD DIED FROM A BULLET FIRED FROM A LEGAL FULL AUTO.
* Behind him was George Bush who banned the importation of foreign made semi-automatic firearms
* George W. Bush said he would have extended the AWB put into place by Clinton, but Congress did not give him that luxury
* Today a nitwit, double talking traitor has promised the Democrats the sun, the moon and the stars on the gun control issue - even advocating circumventing Due Process do it!!!
Every time there is a catastrophe, the Ds and Rs do their song and dance routine over gun control and every time it ends with the Ds getting compromises and more gun control. The problem is, IT DON'T SAVE LIVES.
None of the pabulum puking political propaganda prostitutes from EITHER side has informed you that IF the current laws had been followed, Adam Lanza (who committed the Sandy Hook murders) along with Nickolas Cruz would have been stopped BEFORE the carnage began. The laws were in place, but the cops didn't do their job; the county school system didn't do its job; the FBI didn't do their job. And yet NOBODY with the county faces accountability, the cop who turned tail and ran faces no accountability (Hell he gets to retire and draw a pension); the FBI gets off scott free! Why pass more laws if they don't use the current ones to prevent this crap?
Then they single out those between 17 and 21, the NRA, Republicans, conservatives and everyone else that IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. It is time for gun owners to go on the offensive and offer ways to address the issue without gun control and those of you 17 - 21 could boycott joining the armed forces until the gun control hysteria stops and the government holds those who allowed the mass shootings to happen be held accountable AND consider the proposals that would reduce gun violence without infringing on our Rights. No point in serving a country that won't serve you, but throw you under the bus instead of admitting what the world should know.
Had the government done their jobs under existing law, those children would still be alive. You should not be held accountable for the government's failure to simply do their job.
Well they banned them having alcohol too.... it's what the US does. These people think they're wise because they're older, and they're not.
The right to keep and drink alcohol... which Amendment is that?
Where's the right to breathe air? Or the right to watch TV too?
overall i do not support nor favorIf you are between the ages of 17 - 21 and are following all these gun control threads, there is something I would like you to consider. This isn't a debate, it's a political / legal reality so bear with me.
All of these retail establishments along with the president have decided that until you're 21 you should not own a firearm. What strikes me as odd here is that at 17 you can sign up and go into the military and defend this country, but it's another FOUR YEARS before the government thinks you ought to be able to defend your own life.
If you don't like that, you should urge all those in your age group to boycott the military until Uncle Scam gets his head out of his ..........
Virtually every election cycle when Republicans gain any power, the media and the Democrats sensationalize someone else's misery in order to sell gun control and force the Republicans to sign major gun legislation that ultimately accomplishes NOTHING.
* Under Reagan, he signed a bill to outlaw the future manufacture of fully autos for civilian use - and NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA HAD DIED FROM A BULLET FIRED FROM A LEGAL FULL AUTO.
* Behind him was George Bush who banned the importation of foreign made semi-automatic firearms
* George W. Bush said he would have extended the AWB put into place by Clinton, but Congress did not give him that luxury
* Today a nitwit, double talking traitor has promised the Democrats the sun, the moon and the stars on the gun control issue - even advocating circumventing Due Process do it!!!
Every time there is a catastrophe, the Ds and Rs do their song and dance routine over gun control and every time it ends with the Ds getting compromises and more gun control. The problem is, IT DON'T SAVE LIVES.
None of the pabulum puking political propaganda prostitutes from EITHER side has informed you that IF the current laws had been followed, Adam Lanza (who committed the Sandy Hook murders) along with Nickolas Cruz would have been stopped BEFORE the carnage began. The laws were in place, but the cops didn't do their job; the county school system didn't do its job; the FBI didn't do their job. And yet NOBODY with the county faces accountability, the cop who turned tail and ran faces no accountability (Hell he gets to retire and draw a pension); the FBI gets off scott free! Why pass more laws if they don't use the current ones to prevent this crap?
Then they single out those between 17 and 21, the NRA, Republicans, conservatives and everyone else that IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. It is time for gun owners to go on the offensive and offer ways to address the issue without gun control and those of you 17 - 21 could boycott joining the armed forces until the gun control hysteria stops and the government holds those who allowed the mass shootings to happen be held accountable AND consider the proposals that would reduce gun violence without infringing on our Rights. No point in serving a country that won't serve you, but throw you under the bus instead of admitting what the world should know.
Had the government done their jobs under existing law, those children would still be alive. You should not be held accountable for the government's failure to simply do their job.
Jone’s thinks he is intelligent when he uses the word “fallacy”.False comparison fallacy.They bitched when Reagan raised the drinking age for much the same reasons....
This time they're asking you to put your life on the line, but then telling your life isn't yours to defend for another four years. So, let the people 21 and over fight for this country.
Why is that?
A girl gets pregnant at a younger age. The donor has no interest in being a father yet alone a husband. She finds herself single with child living in a lower-inccme higher crime area because that's all she can afford.
She works, but has to deal with finding people to watch the child while she's away. She's watching television one night and hears a noise in the kitchen on the other side of the apartment. She gets up and hopes not to cross paths with a rodent or something. When she gets to the kitchen, she finds a drugged out man standing in the doorway.
This woman could be your sister, your cousin, your daughter. But because she has no ability to defend herself at 20 years of age, she is totally helpless.
Jone’s thinks he is intelligent when he uses the word “fallacy”.False comparison fallacy.They bitched when Reagan raised the drinking age for much the same reasons....
This time they're asking you to put your life on the line, but then telling your life isn't yours to defend for another four years. So, let the people 21 and over fight for this country.
Why is that?
A girl gets pregnant at a younger age. The donor has no interest in being a father yet alone a husband. She finds herself single with child living in a lower-inccme higher crime area because that's all she can afford.
She works, but has to deal with finding people to watch the child while she's away. She's watching television one night and hears a noise in the kitchen on the other side of the apartment. She gets up and hopes not to cross paths with a rodent or something. When she gets to the kitchen, she finds a drugged out man standing in the doorway.
This woman could be your sister, your cousin, your daughter. But because she has no ability to defend herself at 20 years of age, she is totally helpless.
Put that same sign up in the UK, and it'll not make any difference. Why? Because guns aren't a problem in the UK.
No, it's because they are much less diverse than the US.....for now.
We took all the recreational narcotics away in the US, and the problem is worse now than ever. We have laws against entering or staying in this country illegally, and now there are 11 million or more of those people here.
I'm sure in the UK, people don't want guns. If there is no desire to have them, then it won't be an issue. But that will never be the case here because the criminals will always want guns, and they will get them. Disarming the good guys will only make it worse.
Nothing to do with diversity, but hey, your gun mag told you so, so you keep on believing Ray, reality just ain't for you.
It has everything to do with diversity because you are comparing mostly white counties to ours which has a substantial minority population. Statistically, you are eight times more likely to be murdered by a black than a white in this country. You are twice as likely to be murdered by a Hispanic than a white in this country. So what you are doing is comparing apples to oranges.
The point is it has nothing to do with guns--it has to do with the people. You ship all our minorities to Europe gun laws or not, they will experience the same things we are. Our crime rates would drop to their levels or better.
If you are between the ages of 17 - 21 and are following all these gun control threads, there is something I would like you to consider. This isn't a debate, it's a political / legal reality so bear with me.
All of these retail establishments along with the president have decided that until you're 21 you should not own a firearm. What strikes me as odd here is that at 17 you can sign up and go into the military and defend this country, but it's another FOUR YEARS before the government thinks you ought to be able to defend your own life.
If you don't like that, you should urge all those in your age group to boycott the military until Uncle Scam gets his head out of his ..........
Virtually every election cycle when Republicans gain any power, the media and the Democrats sensationalize someone else's misery in order to sell gun control and force the Republicans to sign major gun legislation that ultimately accomplishes NOTHING.
* Under Reagan, he signed a bill to outlaw the future manufacture of fully autos for civilian use - and NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA HAD DIED FROM A BULLET FIRED FROM A LEGAL FULL AUTO.
* Behind him was George Bush who banned the importation of foreign made semi-automatic firearms
* George W. Bush said he would have extended the AWB put into place by Clinton, but Congress did not give him that luxury
* Today a nitwit, double talking traitor has promised the Democrats the sun, the moon and the stars on the gun control issue - even advocating circumventing Due Process do it!!!
Every time there is a catastrophe, the Ds and Rs do their song and dance routine over gun control and every time it ends with the Ds getting compromises and more gun control. The problem is, IT DON'T SAVE LIVES.
None of the pabulum puking political propaganda prostitutes from EITHER side has informed you that IF the current laws had been followed, Adam Lanza (who committed the Sandy Hook murders) along with Nickolas Cruz would have been stopped BEFORE the carnage began. The laws were in place, but the cops didn't do their job; the county school system didn't do its job; the FBI didn't do their job. And yet NOBODY with the county faces accountability, the cop who turned tail and ran faces no accountability (Hell he gets to retire and draw a pension); the FBI gets off scott free! Why pass more laws if they don't use the current ones to prevent this crap?
Then they single out those between 17 and 21, the NRA, Republicans, conservatives and everyone else that IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. It is time for gun owners to go on the offensive and offer ways to address the issue without gun control and those of you 17 - 21 could boycott joining the armed forces until the gun control hysteria stops and the government holds those who allowed the mass shootings to happen be held accountable AND consider the proposals that would reduce gun violence without infringing on our Rights. No point in serving a country that won't serve you, but throw you under the bus instead of admitting what the world should know.
Had the government done their jobs under existing law, those children would still be alive. You should not be held accountable for the government's failure to simply do their job.
Well they banned them having alcohol too.... it's what the US does. These people think they're wise because they're older, and they're not.
The right to keep and drink alcohol... which Amendment is that?
Where's the right to breathe air? Or the right to watch TV too?
When Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence. It specifically states that:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
A lot can be gleaned from that.
Some Rights are unalienable (literally above the government's jurisdiction.) That is what unalienable means. So, these Rights, given by a Creator (your God, whomever you deem that be) bestows upon you both Liberty and LIFE... and the founders were not shy about the way they felt regarding your Right to defend your life.
Liberty is the ability to do things that do not bring harm to another. Owning a firearm, does not in and of itself bring harm to another human being. Neither does the firearm. However, when you put people on the streets that you KNOW pose a danger to others, you're an idiot. And I'm personally not going to be penalized for the idiocy of politicians that don't want to take nutjobs off the streets and put them into a place where they receive supervised care.
If you are between the ages of 17 - 21 and are following all these gun control threads, there is something I would like you to consider. This isn't a debate, it's a political / legal reality so bear with me.
All of these retail establishments along with the president have decided that until you're 21 you should not own a firearm. What strikes me as odd here is that at 17 you can sign up and go into the military and defend this country, but it's another FOUR YEARS before the government thinks you ought to be able to defend your own life.
If you don't like that, you should urge all those in your age group to boycott the military until Uncle Scam gets his head out of his ..........
Virtually every election cycle when Republicans gain any power, the media and the Democrats sensationalize someone else's misery in order to sell gun control and force the Republicans to sign major gun legislation that ultimately accomplishes NOTHING.
* Under Reagan, he signed a bill to outlaw the future manufacture of fully autos for civilian use - and NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA HAD DIED FROM A BULLET FIRED FROM A LEGAL FULL AUTO.
* Behind him was George Bush who banned the importation of foreign made semi-automatic firearms
* George W. Bush said he would have extended the AWB put into place by Clinton, but Congress did not give him that luxury
* Today a nitwit, double talking traitor has promised the Democrats the sun, the moon and the stars on the gun control issue - even advocating circumventing Due Process do it!!!
Every time there is a catastrophe, the Ds and Rs do their song and dance routine over gun control and every time it ends with the Ds getting compromises and more gun control. The problem is, IT DON'T SAVE LIVES.
None of the pabulum puking political propaganda prostitutes from EITHER side has informed you that IF the current laws had been followed, Adam Lanza (who committed the Sandy Hook murders) along with Nickolas Cruz would have been stopped BEFORE the carnage began. The laws were in place, but the cops didn't do their job; the county school system didn't do its job; the FBI didn't do their job. And yet NOBODY with the county faces accountability, the cop who turned tail and ran faces no accountability (Hell he gets to retire and draw a pension); the FBI gets off scott free! Why pass more laws if they don't use the current ones to prevent this crap?
Then they single out those between 17 and 21, the NRA, Republicans, conservatives and everyone else that IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. It is time for gun owners to go on the offensive and offer ways to address the issue without gun control and those of you 17 - 21 could boycott joining the armed forces until the gun control hysteria stops and the government holds those who allowed the mass shootings to happen be held accountable AND consider the proposals that would reduce gun violence without infringing on our Rights. No point in serving a country that won't serve you, but throw you under the bus instead of admitting what the world should know.
Had the government done their jobs under existing law, those children would still be alive. You should not be held accountable for the government's failure to simply do their job.
Well they banned them having alcohol too.... it's what the US does. These people think they're wise because they're older, and they're not.
The right to keep and drink alcohol... which Amendment is that?
Where's the right to breathe air? Or the right to watch TV too?
When Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence. It specifically states that:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
A lot can be gleaned from that.
Some Rights are unalienable (literally above the government's jurisdiction.) That is what unalienable means. So, these Rights, given by a Creator (your God, whomever you deem that be) bestows upon you both Liberty and LIFE... and the founders were not shy about the way they felt regarding your Right to defend your life.
Liberty is the ability to do things that do not bring harm to another. Owning a firearm, does not in and of itself bring harm to another human being. Neither does the firearm. However, when you put people on the streets that you KNOW pose a danger to others, you're an idiot. And I'm personally not going to be penalized for the idiocy of politicians that don't want to take nutjobs off the streets and put them into a place where they receive supervised care.
And they also implemented a way of changing the Constitution because they knew things would change.
They didn't have ten school shootings in a month back then.
Well they banned them having alcohol too.... it's what the US does. These people think they're wise because they're older, and they're not.
The right to keep and drink alcohol... which Amendment is that?
Where's the right to breathe air? Or the right to watch TV too?
When Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence. It specifically states that:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
A lot can be gleaned from that.
Some Rights are unalienable (literally above the government's jurisdiction.) That is what unalienable means. So, these Rights, given by a Creator (your God, whomever you deem that be) bestows upon you both Liberty and LIFE... and the founders were not shy about the way they felt regarding your Right to defend your life.
Liberty is the ability to do things that do not bring harm to another. Owning a firearm, does not in and of itself bring harm to another human being. Neither does the firearm. However, when you put people on the streets that you KNOW pose a danger to others, you're an idiot. And I'm personally not going to be penalized for the idiocy of politicians that don't want to take nutjobs off the streets and put them into a place where they receive supervised care.
And they also implemented a way of changing the Constitution because they knew things would change.
They didn't have ten school shootings in a month back then.
We don't have 10 school shootings in a month now!
The right to keep and drink alcohol... which Amendment is that?
Where's the right to breathe air? Or the right to watch TV too?
When Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence. It specifically states that:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
A lot can be gleaned from that.
Some Rights are unalienable (literally above the government's jurisdiction.) That is what unalienable means. So, these Rights, given by a Creator (your God, whomever you deem that be) bestows upon you both Liberty and LIFE... and the founders were not shy about the way they felt regarding your Right to defend your life.
Liberty is the ability to do things that do not bring harm to another. Owning a firearm, does not in and of itself bring harm to another human being. Neither does the firearm. However, when you put people on the streets that you KNOW pose a danger to others, you're an idiot. And I'm personally not going to be penalized for the idiocy of politicians that don't want to take nutjobs off the streets and put them into a place where they receive supervised care.
And they also implemented a way of changing the Constitution because they knew things would change.
They didn't have ten school shootings in a month back then.
We don't have 10 school shootings in a month now!
Whatever, there were five in January, three in February, that's a lot.
I was 59 before I bought a gun, 60 when I sold it and I managed to live all this time without one.If you are between the ages of 17 - 21 and are following all these gun control threads, there is something I would like you to consider. This isn't a debate, it's a political / legal reality so bear with me.
All of these retail establishments along with the president have decided that until you're 21 you should not own a firearm. What strikes me as odd here is that at 17 you can sign up and go into the military and defend this country, but it's another FOUR YEARS before the government thinks you ought to be able to defend your own life.
If you don't like that, you should urge all those in your age group to boycott the military until Uncle Scam gets his head out of his ..........
Virtually every election cycle when Republicans gain any power, the media and the Democrats sensationalize someone else's misery in order to sell gun control and force the Republicans to sign major gun legislation that ultimately accomplishes NOTHING.
* Under Reagan, he signed a bill to outlaw the future manufacture of fully autos for civilian use - and NOT ONE SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA HAD DIED FROM A BULLET FIRED FROM A LEGAL FULL AUTO.
* Behind him was George Bush who banned the importation of foreign made semi-automatic firearms
* George W. Bush said he would have extended the AWB put into place by Clinton, but Congress did not give him that luxury
* Today a nitwit, double talking traitor has promised the Democrats the sun, the moon and the stars on the gun control issue - even advocating circumventing Due Process do it!!!
Every time there is a catastrophe, the Ds and Rs do their song and dance routine over gun control and every time it ends with the Ds getting compromises and more gun control. The problem is, IT DON'T SAVE LIVES.
None of the pabulum puking political propaganda prostitutes from EITHER side has informed you that IF the current laws had been followed, Adam Lanza (who committed the Sandy Hook murders) along with Nickolas Cruz would have been stopped BEFORE the carnage began. The laws were in place, but the cops didn't do their job; the county school system didn't do its job; the FBI didn't do their job. And yet NOBODY with the county faces accountability, the cop who turned tail and ran faces no accountability (Hell he gets to retire and draw a pension); the FBI gets off scott free! Why pass more laws if they don't use the current ones to prevent this crap?
Then they single out those between 17 and 21, the NRA, Republicans, conservatives and everyone else that IS NOT RESPONSIBLE. It is time for gun owners to go on the offensive and offer ways to address the issue without gun control and those of you 17 - 21 could boycott joining the armed forces until the gun control hysteria stops and the government holds those who allowed the mass shootings to happen be held accountable AND consider the proposals that would reduce gun violence without infringing on our Rights. No point in serving a country that won't serve you, but throw you under the bus instead of admitting what the world should know.
Had the government done their jobs under existing law, those children would still be alive. You should not be held accountable for the government's failure to simply do their job.
I was 59 before I bought a gun, 60 when I sold it and I managed to live all this time without one.
Where's the right to breathe air? Or the right to watch TV too?
When Jefferson penned the Declaration of Independence. It specifically states that:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
A lot can be gleaned from that.
Some Rights are unalienable (literally above the government's jurisdiction.) That is what unalienable means. So, these Rights, given by a Creator (your God, whomever you deem that be) bestows upon you both Liberty and LIFE... and the founders were not shy about the way they felt regarding your Right to defend your life.
Liberty is the ability to do things that do not bring harm to another. Owning a firearm, does not in and of itself bring harm to another human being. Neither does the firearm. However, when you put people on the streets that you KNOW pose a danger to others, you're an idiot. And I'm personally not going to be penalized for the idiocy of politicians that don't want to take nutjobs off the streets and put them into a place where they receive supervised care.
And they also implemented a way of changing the Constitution because they knew things would change.
They didn't have ten school shootings in a month back then.
We don't have 10 school shootings in a month now!
Whatever, there were five in January, three in February, that's a lot.
Oh please. That bogus information has been discussed on USMB. They considered anything a "school shooting" from drug deals going on in the parking lots after school to violent attacks in the summer when the school was not in session. That study is as phony as a three dollar bill.
Yes Ray, 17 kids being shot up and killed is fake news. Yes, we get it, you have no morals Ray.
First one was a guy shooting up a school bus
Second was someone shot and killed at a university
Third was a pupil shooting someone in a cafeteria at school
Fourth was someone shooting from a truck at school pupils in school
Fifth was in the lobby at a school and two students died
That was January.
Which of these wasn't a school shooting Ray?
If I was 18, I'd be pissed! Sad that future 18 year-olds will now be denied the freedom I had because government failed to do their job.
