Failzero
Platinum Member
Exactly , that is why 2A/ RTKBA purists make me wanna pukeIllegal gun ownership isn't though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly , that is why 2A/ RTKBA purists make me wanna pukeIllegal gun ownership isn't though.
It will maybe be tossed in a few years. Maybe.The law passed in California will be tossed because it oversteps a States rights vs the Constitution and the Second Amendment.
You know this and it is just political theater for Gavin possible run in 2024 for President.
Hell, Gavin even knows this law will not stand!
It will be and you know it.It will maybe be tossed in a few years. Maybe.
tyrants in black robes?....when they dont go your way they are tyrants in black robes.....when they judge your way then they are judges again....you are a dipshit jones....But aren’t you and other conservatives ‘advocates’ of “states’ rights” – isn’t this a matter for the people of California to address, not tyrants in black robes legislating from the bench in violation of the will of the people.
There is no right to privacy. The Burger court invented it out of whole cloth as cover for a political decision.Conservatives have only themselves to blame with their bad-faith efforts to circumvent the right to privacy.
I don’t know, he’s pretty stupid given his personal conduct during the COVID shutdown.The law passed in California will be tossed because it oversteps a States rights vs the Constitution and the Second Amendment.
You know this and it is just political theater for Gavin possible run in 2024 for President.
Hell, Gavin even knows this law will not stand!
From WAPO:It will be and you know it.
Even Gavin Knows it!
So stop applauding this political theater when it was set up to fail in the first place.
The point of the law was to show the Court being to Conservative and not align in the best interest of the Nation but what will happen is it will fail…
LOL name one time a manufacturer was caught selling firearms illegally?Illegal gun ownership isn't though.
LolLOL name one time a manufacturer was caught selling firearms illegally?
No manufacturer sells to illegals or criminals.Lol
How bout I describe “ Prohibited Persons “ that not only make sense but that pass constitutional muster too ...
No Illegals or Criminals or Enemy combatants who enter our Country illegally have 2A/RTKBANo manufacturer sells to illegals or criminals.
Private individuals are authorized to sue and find out, just like in Texas.LOL name one time a manufacturer was caught selling firearms illegally?
NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT THATLOL name one time a manufacturer was caught selling firearms illegally?
you and your dailykos hard on bullshit need to get a room and stop this shit.As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.
But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.
Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale
In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...www.dailykos.com
LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.
Off topic outburst, mind numbingyou and your dailykos hard on bullshit need to get a room and stop this shit.
need a dailykosbullshit forum for you to play in.
Sam Paredes, the executive director of Gun Owners of California, told the Los Angeles Times that the legislation is a “retaliation against lawful gun owners and the court because of the Texas decision,” and that the bill’s authors are being “vindictive.” Paredes said that the firearms industry will have a “strong reaction” to the bill going into law, according to the Times.
The court will simply break out their scalpel and cut the law to fit their agenda.As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.
But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.
Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale
In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...www.dailykos.com
LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.
DailykosOff topic outburst, mind numbing
here, let me help you... from the article...
As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.
As explained in Los Angeles Magazine, the gun industry is not at all happy.
But a strong reaction is exactly what Newsom is counting on. Since the Supreme Court has thus far allowed Texas’ noxious “abortion bounty” law to stand, he believes the California legislation, which is closely modeled on the Texas legislation, will have to stand as well. As Stracqualursi’s report notes, SB 1327 contains a provision that will render itself invalid if and when the Supreme Court invalidates the Texas “bounty” law.
Gun manufacturers livid after California governor signs 'bounty' bill curbing illegal firearms' sale
In almost any mass shooting involving an assault-style weapon in this country, there are varying levels of moral culpability. The first and most obvious is the culpability of the shooter himself (they are almost always men), who consciously chooses to...www.dailykos.com
LOL. Fucking love it. Now the court has to either uphold both, or disregard both. Brilliant move by Newsome. The court would only further erode what little credibility it has left, if it tries to rationalize it's decision of one against the other.
No, stupid.Dailykos
Fuck off.