Guiliani and Evangelicals

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Annie, Feb 28, 2007.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I like this, because it is nuanced. :rofl:
    Granted, the Corner is better than usual. ;)
    Links at site

    http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTkxYzAyNGM0OTAxMWU2YzY4MzI5NWZkOTVkODkxMmQ=

    'The Evangelicals' are often referring to a diverse group which includes Catholics and Jews. Obviously the grouping is wrong, but that doesn't stop the MSM.

    Abortion is important to Catholics, but right now it's the 'law of the land' so until we get at least one more judicial constitutionalist, we deal with it. More important to Catholic conservatives and I'd venture Jewish conservatives is the WOT. While McCain is likely as strong, he has McCain-Feingold. Not acceptable, cutting free speech is a non-starter for those that others wish to oppress.

    Add McCain's stance and condescension on illegal immigration and Rudy's numbers are unsurprising.
     
  2. Avatar4321
    Online

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,550
    Thanks Received:
    8,163
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,176
    I have a feeling McCain is going to go down quickly once the other candidates are known better.
     
  3. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    He's already fallen, but not as much as Mitt.
     
  4. trobinett
    Offline

    trobinett Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,832
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Arkansas, The Ozarks
    Ratings:
    +162
    I don't agree, lets give it a little more time.

    Everyone is still "feeling" their way around.

    McCain has to get his "sea legs".

    Lets see what this looks like in 16 months.:cool:
     
  5. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Agreed, it's way too soon to call it.
     
  6. red states rule
    Offline

    red states rule Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    16,011
    Thanks Received:
    571
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +572
    Whistling Past Graveyard: Some in MSM Cling to Belief GOP Won't Support Rudy
    Posted by Mark Finkelstein on March 2, 2007 - 20:58.
    I seem to be detecting a trend. There's a current in the MSM that fears Rudy Giuliani, perhaps sensing he might be best positioned to defeat the Dem candidate. Such folks console themselves by clinging to the belief that the GOP won't nominate Rudy, or at least won't avidly support him if he is the candidate, given his liberal positions on some issues.

    This evening's Hardball offered a perfect example of the phenomenon in the person of Craig Crawford. Time and again, the MSNBC analyst returned to the theme:

    View video here.

    "Getting onto the social conservative stuff: abortion, gay rights, etc., [Rudy at CPAC] did make the case that I'm 80% with you, better than most marriages, a pretty good line, but at the end of the day, they're important issues to these people, and I just really wonder, the more they learn about him, and just how liberal he really is on those issues, I think it's going to matter to them."
    "Maybe I've just covered these social conservatives and these Republican races for too long to believe they're suddenly going to forget about that stuff, no matter how much they like Giuliani otherwise."
    "I think if Giuliani wins this nomination, and he well could, social conservative voters are not going to play in the general election, and that's going to help Democrats."
    "I really do believe a lot of these [socially conservative] voters and a lot of these groups are losing interest in politics."
    "I don't think they've heard all the details of his personal life, and the judges [the liberal ones in NYC Rudy appointed] we're talking about."
    Jim Vandehei, ex of WaPo, now with Politico.com, was dubious of Crawford's notion: "I think that the conventional wisdom must be wrong, this idea that once conservatives get to know Giuliani's record. I mean, how can they not know his record? Everybody's talking about it."

    Chris Matthews, flatly rejecting Crawford's theory, adopted a real-politik analysis:

    "Are [abortion, gay rights] relevant issues?"
    "Hasn't [Rudy] kow-towed a bit by saying I'll pick strict-constructionist judges?"
    "You really think they're going to put Huckabee up there against Hillary Clinton or Obama and risk getting beat?"
    "I couldn't disagree with you [Crawford] more. When [conservatives] get a look at the Democratic nominee, they're going to vote like they've never voted in their lives."
    "American voters don't vote 'for,' they vote 'against.' And when they see Hillary or Obama coming, a lot of these Republicans are going to say, 'God, that Rudy is pretty cool, I like him."
    "Sometimes I wish I was in the gambling business. I could stop talking to guys like you [Craig] and put some money on the table, and I'd get rich. Wait a year from now."
    Be that as it may, whether the MSM is finding reasons to hope Republicans won't nominate Rudy, or betting they will, it does seem clear that the liberal media view him as the most formidable candidate.

    http://newsbusters.org/node/11163
     

Share This Page