teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
- 290
Dumbass liberal! And then liberals wonder why liberal has become a dirty word in this country.
The PJ Tatler » NYT magazine cover story: ‘A Beast Within the Heart of Every Fighting Man’ (Update: Blackfive fisks the story)
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/magazine/mag-01KillTeam-t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine
This ranks up there as LIBERAL RANK STUPID as the NYT doing a fawning article on William Ayers (UNREPENTANT TERRORIST) on the day of 9/11.
Yes, the NYT did JILLIAN, RAVI, CARBINER, WRY CATCHER, and TRUTHMATTERS (I know those idiots believe everything liberals tell them) Someday they may figure out they have been lied too, but I highly doubt it. That would require growing brains.
No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives - In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen - NYTimes.com
I mean seriously. Maligning our soldiers as "beasts???" The men who risk their lives for us EVERY DAY??????????
There goes all the BS liberals say about "we support the troops, but hate the war."
BS! That's why liberals can release all those photos of Abu Graube but not one photo of a Dead Bin Laden.
Another liberal has let it slip what they really think of the troops.
It reveals nothing has changed since the Vietnam War. They still sympathize with the terrorists like Ayers, while "loathing the military" (Bill Clinton's words).
This is just another example.
I can't WAIT for the typical liberal excuse of "That's only one person!"
Yeah right! How many of you giving that excuse sided with Murtha on Haditha?
'nuff said!
NYT magazine cover story: A Beast Within the Heart of Every Fighting Man
Well call this the mother of all narrative fails. The very week that the NYT magazine runs a negative, anti-military cover story with a brooding graphic on the cover, the beast within the heart of the US Navy SEALs takes down the worlds worst terrorist. No kidding.
Beneath that cover over at the mags web site, we get this for a teaser:
The case against American soldiers accused of murdering Afghan civilians turns on the idea of a rogue unit. But what if the killings are a symptom of a deeper problem?Well. The case of the New York Times trashing the military the very week that it efficiently takes down Osama bin Laden turns on some yellow journalism and awful timing. But what if the Times releasing of US war plans before the invasion of Iraq, its cheerleading for the Soviets and the Viet Cong and whoever else happens to be against America at the moment, is a symptom of a deeper problem?
The PJ Tatler » NYT magazine cover story: ‘A Beast Within the Heart of Every Fighting Man’ (Update: Blackfive fisks the story)
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/magazine/mag-01KillTeam-t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine
This ranks up there as LIBERAL RANK STUPID as the NYT doing a fawning article on William Ayers (UNREPENTANT TERRORIST) on the day of 9/11.
Yes, the NYT did JILLIAN, RAVI, CARBINER, WRY CATCHER, and TRUTHMATTERS (I know those idiots believe everything liberals tell them) Someday they may figure out they have been lied too, but I highly doubt it. That would require growing brains.
With the Weathermen No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life
By DINITIA SMITH
Published: September 11, 2001
''I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.'' Mr. Ayers, who spent the 1970's as a fugitive in the Weather Underground, was sitting in the kitchen of his big turn-of-the-19th-century stone house in the Hyde Park district of Chicago. The long curly locks in his Wanted poster are shorn, though he wears earrings. He still has tattooed on his neck the rainbow-and-lightning Weathermen logo that appeared on letters taking responsibility for bombings. And he still has the ebullient, ingratiating manner, the apparently intense interest in other people, that made him a charismatic figure in the radical student movement.
No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives - In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen - NYTimes.com
I mean seriously. Maligning our soldiers as "beasts???" The men who risk their lives for us EVERY DAY??????????
There goes all the BS liberals say about "we support the troops, but hate the war."
BS! That's why liberals can release all those photos of Abu Graube but not one photo of a Dead Bin Laden.
Another liberal has let it slip what they really think of the troops.
It reveals nothing has changed since the Vietnam War. They still sympathize with the terrorists like Ayers, while "loathing the military" (Bill Clinton's words).
This is just another example.
I can't WAIT for the typical liberal excuse of "That's only one person!"
Yeah right! How many of you giving that excuse sided with Murtha on Haditha?
'nuff said!