governors losing powers

Discussion in 'Politics' started by DKSuddeth, Jun 9, 2004.

  1. DKSuddeth
    Offline

    DKSuddeth Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    5,175
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Texas
    Ratings:
    +62
    alaskas new law

    JUNEAU, Alaska - A bill to prevent Alaska governors from making any more long-term appointments to the U.S. Senate became law over the weekend, without Gov. Frank Murkowski's signature.

    The law passed after Murkowski appointed his daughter, then state Rep. Lisa Murkowski, to fill his Senate seat following his election as governor in 2002. The appointment led to cries of nepotism from some Alaskans.

    The new law calls for a special election to be held 60 to 90 days after a Senate vacancy occurs. Previously, the governor could appoint a new senator if less than 2 1/2 years remained in the departing lawmaker's term.

    The new law still allows the governor to appoint a replacement, but the replacement would serve only until the special election could be held.

    The governor's spokesman, John Manly, said Murkowski did not say why he did not sign the bill. "I'm not aware of any position we took on it," Manly said.

    The governor has 20 days to sign or veto a bill once it reaches his desk. If he takes no action, the bill becomes law without his signature.

    Legislators passed the law earlier this year after it became clear that a measure to do about the same thing had gathered enough signatures to go on the November ballot.

    Sen. Murkowski faces three Republican challengers in the August primary. If she wins, she will run against Democratic former Gov. Tony Knowles in November.
     
  2. tpahl
    Offline

    tpahl Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    662
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Cascadia
    Ratings:
    +3
    This sounds like a continuation of the horrible trend of increased democracy at the expense of our republic. The 17th amendment is quite possibly the worst thing we have done as a nation since our founding fathers established the country.


     
  3. 5stringJeff
    Offline

    5stringJeff Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,990
    Thanks Received:
    536
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Ratings:
    +540
    I honestly don't see what the problem is with this law. However, I think it would be ridiculous if, say, a Senator resigned or died 100 days before a general election. Would there be a special election and then a general election 10 days later?
     

Share This Page