Government vs. The Free Market

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,985
60,377
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
May 24, 1844

Samuel F.B. Morse telegraphs: “What hath G-d wrought?” from Washington to Baltimore Anne Ellsworth, the daughter of the commissioner of patents, had chosen the phrase for Morse. The test was a success, and on May 29th news of James K. Polk’s nomination flashed across the 40 miles to Washington.

Federal financing was the source of Morse's funding for his invention.



Economic history proves that interference by the federal government in the free market is an impediment to the smooth running of same.
Samuel Morse is but one example.





1. 'Businessmen' is another name for entrepreneurs. There are a couple of kind of such folks.

a. There are folks such as Steve Jobs, who took an idea, infused it with practical experience, lots of hard work, risk, and took the product to market. OK, many failed...but something is in them that drives them to try again....and, ultimately succeed. They are known as "market entrepreneurs," as they rely on private enterprise and the free market. They understand that success will be based on providing a service, or a product, or something new that customers want.


b. On the obverse, there are politicians who trace advancement of society to government efforts, as in the 'you didn't build that' view.
Those who share that view believe that federal spending jump-starts the economy and leads to prosperity; many Americans look to federal largess to start their enterprise. They lobby Congress for appropriations, and even write the laws that would benefit their endeavors. These are known as "political entrepreneurs."




2. President Jefferson was one of the first to agree to government investments: in 1806, he signed a bill to fund the National Road. The funding was thought to be consistent with the enumerated powers, as it was considered necessary for both national defense, and for mail delivery.
See Karl Raitz, "The National Road and American Culture."

a. But, once construction began, the pattern was exactly the same as one can see today in government projects: as long as taxpayer funds were provided, the road got longer and longer, with twists and turns....politicians with the clout made certain that the road went all through their districts, whether it made sense or not.

b. Brings to mind the transcontinental railroad, and Amtrak.




3. There is, in this tale, a validation of the conservative view of human nature. People will always rationalize their own wishes, often convincing even themselves that their decisions are altruistic. This understanding is why the Founders, classical liberals. or, as we would call them today, conservatives, demanded checks and balances. Even so, they probably realized that men would, ultimately, find a way around them.
And they did.


a. One of the 'detours' taken by the National Road was through vote-rich Washington County during an election year. Jefferson's Treasury Secretary, Albert Gallatin, wrote: "The county of Washington, wkityh which I am well acquainted, having represented it for six years in Congress, gives a uniform majority of about 2000 votes in our favor and that if this be thrown, by reason of this road, in a wrong scale, we will, infallibly, lose the state of Pennsylvania in the next election."
Phillip Jordan, "The National Road," p. 79.

4. Because the road was a government project, costs weren't kept down, it became one of the most expensive roads at the time. In comparison, the Lancaster Turnpike was privately funded, cost $7,500/ mile...the National Road, $13,000/mile.
"The Transportation Revolution, 1815-1860 (Economic History of the United States)," George Rogers Taylor, p. 30





5. And, because there was no private ownership, the construction was shoddy, it was never fully paved, had gaps, and always needed repair.
Jordan, Op.Cit., pgs. 95-102.

a. Like this:
"BOSTON, July 11 — Huge slabs of concrete weighing at least 12 tons fell from the ceiling of one of the Big Dig tunnels in Boston.... the catastrophe follows a series of leaks and other problems that have resulted in investigations and raised questions about the safety and management of parts of the recently-completed $14.6 billion Big Dig, the central highway system through Boston.." http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/11/us/11cnd-boston.html?_r=0
 
There is nothing intrinsically good or bad about government involvement in the marketplace. FDR's rural electrification program, for instance, had a lot of public good involved in it.

The real rub is how much of what we do as "government" really has legitimate national value, and how much of it is just vote buying. Over the last decade or so, there has been a steady increase in public rhetoric toward punishing the wealthy/successful to the point that alone seems to some people to have legitimate national value all on its own. It does not.

If we were to raise taxes to pay for specific projects of populist merit, then I doubt there would be a lot of difficulty garnering support. Unfortunately, there is none of that going on. The best people can come up with are some nebular bias specific generalizations. If there is no need for new roads, then we should not be building new roads just to "create jobs". If giant sea walls are only going to benefit directly the millionaires who have beachfront property, then let them move--they can afford it. If alternative energy research is only being pursued with commercial supplier scale focus, then let the commercial suppliers pay for it since they will be raping us either way.
 
There is nothing intrinsically good or bad about government involvement in the marketplace. FDR's rural electrification program, for instance, had a lot of public good involved in it.

The real rub is how much of what we do as "government" really has legitimate national value, and how much of it is just vote buying. Over the last decade or so, there has been a steady increase in public rhetoric toward punishing the wealthy/successful to the point that alone seems to some people to have legitimate national value all on its own. It does not.

If we were to raise taxes to pay for specific projects of populist merit, then I doubt there would be a lot of difficulty garnering support. Unfortunately, there is none of that going on. The best people can come up with are some nebular bias specific generalizations. If there is no need for new roads, then we should not be building new roads just to "create jobs". If giant sea walls are only going to benefit directly the millionaires who have beachfront property, then let them move--they can afford it. If alternative energy research is only being pursued with commercial supplier scale focus, then let the commercial suppliers pay for it since they will be raping us either way.




So......you hadn't heard of Article I, section 8?
 
If Senators or Representatives vote for a program they want to know how that program benefits their state or district, and in bigger programs, bigger costs, many more involved, and that is the nature of government programs. Would we expect a Senator or Representative to say, well we don't get any benefit from the program but I'll vote for it anyway, the amazing thing is that some do. In any case that is the way of government programs, but at least the money usually goes to American companies and American workers, and the result is large dams, roads, schools, and all the things private industry is not motivated to build for profit.
 
If Senators or Representatives vote for a program they want to know how that program benefits their state or district, and in bigger programs, bigger costs, many more involved, and that is the nature of government programs. Would we expect a Senator or Representative to say, well we don't get any benefit from the program but I'll vote for it anyway, the amazing thing is that some do. In any case that is the way of government programs, but at least the money usually goes to American companies and American workers, and the result is large dams, roads, schools, and all the things private industry is not motivated to build for profit.




1. "and that is the nature of government programs.....

..... In any case that is the way of government programs,..."

Exactly the point of the OP.....keep the federal government out of the free market.





2. ".... but at least the money usually goes to American companies and American workers,..."

Wrong again, reggie.....




1. The Obama administration had joined the new Arab-based International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), and agreed to provide millions to support international green energy jobs. “In its fiscal 2012 budget request for international programs, the administration has asked for $5.2 million for IRENA.” U.S. Taxpayers on the Hook As Obama Joins a New International Renewable Energy Agency | CNS News How many jobs in the United States will this endeavor provide?

2. Obama regulatory and tax policies sent jobs overseas.

3. “President Barack Obama will present his “jobs plan” on Wednesday at a company which is shipping jobs overseas…. WestStar is a high-end, specialty manufacturer that just opened a new facility in San Jose, Costa Rica — creating many new jobs there, but not in the United States.” http://test.dailycaller.com/2011/09...c-company-that’s-shipping-jobs-to-costa-rica/




4. “This isn’t the first time Obama has chosen to speak at a North Carolina company outsourcing jobs overseas. In mid-June, Obama spoke at Cree LED Light Company to discuss his job creation and economic policies. Cree has been shipping jobs to China.” Ibid.

a. Cree was also a recipient of Obama stimulus funds, a portion of which was also used to send jobs overseas.
Limbaugh, “The Great Destroyer,” p.27.

5. “The Department of Energy estimated that 82,000 jobs have been created and has acknowledged that as much as 80 percent of some green programs, including $2.3 billion of manufacturing tax credits, went to foreign firms that employed workers primarily in countries includingChina, South Korea and Spain, rather than in the United States.” 'Green' jobs no longer golden in stimulus - Washington Times




6. WASHINGTON -- Xerox, whose CEO, Ursula Burns, is advising President Obama on exports, last week told its product engineering employees that it is in outsourcing talks with India-based IT services firm HCL Technologies. Xerox CEO, an Obama appointee, may send jobs to Indian firm - Computerworld

7. (CNSNews.com) – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said today that he told his daughter to buy a Japanese car--a Toyota Sienna--and that she did so. U.S. Transportation Secretary: I Told My Daughter to Buy Japanese Car | CNS News




8. “U.S. funds, Arizona effort help Mexico trucks pollute less
Using EPA grant money, the state offered to refit the trucks with the new exhaust systems, replacing factory-installed mufflers with converters similar to what is required for U.S. trucks. The process takes two or three hours to complete at a cost per truck of about $1,600…. The entire cost - parts and labor - is paid by the EPA grant through ADEQ.” U.S. funds, Arizona effort help Mexico trucks pollute less


9. “…Obama administration is now taking your American tax dollars and using them to fund the BBC World Service — Britain’s state-financed radio network.” The PJ Tatler » Your tax dollars now funding the BBC in addition to NPR




And....you say, what?
 
The OP is a fruit loop of logic.

PC merely displays her fanatical political philosophy devoid of any meaningful reason.

Fact, there is no free market. The large corporations won't permit such.

Fact, democratic market economies depend on a referee: that's government.

Fact, every time market regulations are relaxed we end up with great depressions (1893 and 1929) and great recession (2009).

Fact, PC can't respond logically to the above so she will slur.
 
The OP is a fruit loop of logic.

PC merely displays her fanatical political philosophy devoid of any meaningful reason.

Fact, there is no free market. The large corporations won't permit such.

Fact, democratic market economies depend on a referee: that's government.

Fact, every time market regulations are relaxed we end up with great depressions (1893 and 1929) and great recession (2009).

Fact, PC can't respond logically to the above so she will slur.

Smart man. But they can't think this deeply and understand such concepts.
 
In an earlier era, government officials looked to the Constitution, Article 1, section 8, the enumerated powers, to authorize areas into which government could insert itself.
Of course, since the 32nd President, the Constitution has become what red and green lights are in Rome: merely a suggestion.



6. Remember, claiming the National Road as a federal post road made it constitutional for government funding. But, bumpy rides, steep grades, mud slides,....US postmaster R.J. Meigs found the road so impassable that the mail was almost indeliverable.
Jordan, Op. Cit., p. 283-285



7. Push-back included this, from John Campbell of South Carolina: "Who can suppose that the opening of roads by the government is necessary to attract the farmer to the virgin soil of the West?"

Clearly, there were roads built by the states or by private entrepreneurs that brought immigrants westward. And, they were better built, constitutional, and required no federal funds.
Ibid., p.172.



Sometimes Big Government Progressives have to admit their failure....





By 1850 the National Road was barely used....and largely abandoned. Ibid., p.175
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Think of it like a basketball game. One team is the consumers and the other team is business and government is the referee.



Referee???

You can't be serious.


1. “On March 3, 2007 USA Today ran a piece on then-Senator Obama regarding two stocks in his portfolio. Obama was running for President and his critics were stating that the Senator may have been involved in insider trading, cronyism, using his position for personal gain, etc. Basically the media ran this story for a day, and then kissed it goodbye. Could you imagine the outrage if these same set of circumstances involved a Republican running for President?”
Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman


2. And, from the original AP story:
WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday he was not aware he had invested in two companies backed by some of his top donors and said he had done nothing to aid their business with the government. The Illinois senator faced questions about more than $50,000 in investments he made right after taking office in 2005 in two speculative companies, AVI Biopharma and Skyterra Communications.



3. Obama purchased $5,000 in shares for AVI, which was developing a drug to treat avian flu. Two weeks after buying the stock, as the disease was spreading in Asia, Obama pushed for more federal funding to fight the disease, but he said he did not discuss the matter with any company officials.



4. Obama also had more than $50,000 in shares of Skyterra, a company that had just received federal permission to create a nationwide wireless network that combined satellite and land-based communications systems. Among the company’s top investors were donors who raised more than $150,000 for Obama’s political committees, the New York Times reported Wednesday.


5. Obama said he didn’t invest in a qualified blind trust because it wouldn’t enable him to limit which companies he invested in, such as those in the tobacco industry and other areas that he did not want to support.
USATODAY.com - Obama faces questions on his investments


6. Obama with coincidental investment connections. Obama who was an upside down borrower on his condo. Obama who just got a little “boneheaded” advice from convicted felon Tony Rezko when he bought his mansion in Chicago. Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman





7. Skyterra doesn’t ring a bell? Well, how about under its new name: LightSquared? “Reston-based satellite company SkyTerra Communications Inc. re-emerged July 20 as LightSquared,…” SkyTerra, now LightSquared, enters the national 4G race - Washington Business Journal

8. “The liberal Daily Beast reports on a broadband project backed by a frequent Obama White House visitor and donor that has Pentagon officials concerned over potential military GPS interference. The Obama FCC took the lead in intervening on the donor, billionaire hedge fund manager Philip Falcone’s, behalf and granting his company called “LightSquared” one of those coveted Obama waivers from existing law. Then Obama officials reportedly pressured a general to alter his testimony about the company’s impact on military satellite transmissions.” Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?

9. The liberal Daily Beast reports: “Now the Pentagon has been raising concerns about a new wireless project by a satellite broadband company in Virginia called LightSquared, whose majority owner is an investment fund run by Democratic donor Philip Falcone.

Gen. Shelton was originally scheduled to testify Aug. 3 to a House committee that the project would interfere with the military’s sensitive Global Positioning Satellite capabilities, which control automated driving directions and missile targeting, among other things.”
Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?


10. Referee?

Wise up.
 
Think of it like a basketball game. One team is the consumers and the other team is business and government is the referee.



Referee???

You can't be serious.


1. “On March 3, 2007 USA Today ran a piece on then-Senator Obama regarding two stocks in his portfolio. Obama was running for President and his critics were stating that the Senator may have been involved in insider trading, cronyism, using his position for personal gain, etc. Basically the media ran this story for a day, and then kissed it goodbye. Could you imagine the outrage if these same set of circumstances involved a Republican running for President?”
Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman


2. And, from the original AP story:
WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday he was not aware he had invested in two companies backed by some of his top donors and said he had done nothing to aid their business with the government. The Illinois senator faced questions about more than $50,000 in investments he made right after taking office in 2005 in two speculative companies, AVI Biopharma and Skyterra Communications.



3. Obama purchased $5,000 in shares for AVI, which was developing a drug to treat avian flu. Two weeks after buying the stock, as the disease was spreading in Asia, Obama pushed for more federal funding to fight the disease, but he said he did not discuss the matter with any company officials.



4. Obama also had more than $50,000 in shares of Skyterra, a company that had just received federal permission to create a nationwide wireless network that combined satellite and land-based communications systems. Among the company’s top investors were donors who raised more than $150,000 for Obama’s political committees, the New York Times reported Wednesday.


5. Obama said he didn’t invest in a qualified blind trust because it wouldn’t enable him to limit which companies he invested in, such as those in the tobacco industry and other areas that he did not want to support.
USATODAY.com - Obama faces questions on his investments


6. Obama with coincidental investment connections. Obama who was an upside down borrower on his condo. Obama who just got a little “boneheaded” advice from convicted felon Tony Rezko when he bought his mansion in Chicago. Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman





7. Skyterra doesn’t ring a bell? Well, how about under its new name: LightSquared? “Reston-based satellite company SkyTerra Communications Inc. re-emerged July 20 as LightSquared,…” SkyTerra, now LightSquared, enters the national 4G race - Washington Business Journal

8. “The liberal Daily Beast reports on a broadband project backed by a frequent Obama White House visitor and donor that has Pentagon officials concerned over potential military GPS interference. The Obama FCC took the lead in intervening on the donor, billionaire hedge fund manager Philip Falcone’s, behalf and granting his company called “LightSquared” one of those coveted Obama waivers from existing law. Then Obama officials reportedly pressured a general to alter his testimony about the company’s impact on military satellite transmissions.” Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?

9. The liberal Daily Beast reports: “Now the Pentagon has been raising concerns about a new wireless project by a satellite broadband company in Virginia called LightSquared, whose majority owner is an investment fund run by Democratic donor Philip Falcone.

Gen. Shelton was originally scheduled to testify Aug. 3 to a House committee that the project would interfere with the military’s sensitive Global Positioning Satellite capabilities, which control automated driving directions and missile targeting, among other things.”
Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?


10. Referee?

Wise up.

Its the way it's supposed to work stupid. P.S. Chaney was a defense contractor and bush was an oil man and they invaded Iraq and raped us.
 
Think of it like a basketball game. One team is the consumers and the other team is business and government is the referee.



Referee???

You can't be serious.


1. “On March 3, 2007 USA Today ran a piece on then-Senator Obama regarding two stocks in his portfolio. Obama was running for President and his critics were stating that the Senator may have been involved in insider trading, cronyism, using his position for personal gain, etc. Basically the media ran this story for a day, and then kissed it goodbye. Could you imagine the outrage if these same set of circumstances involved a Republican running for President?”
Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman


2. And, from the original AP story:
WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday he was not aware he had invested in two companies backed by some of his top donors and said he had done nothing to aid their business with the government. The Illinois senator faced questions about more than $50,000 in investments he made right after taking office in 2005 in two speculative companies, AVI Biopharma and Skyterra Communications.



3. Obama purchased $5,000 in shares for AVI, which was developing a drug to treat avian flu. Two weeks after buying the stock, as the disease was spreading in Asia, Obama pushed for more federal funding to fight the disease, but he said he did not discuss the matter with any company officials.



4. Obama also had more than $50,000 in shares of Skyterra, a company that had just received federal permission to create a nationwide wireless network that combined satellite and land-based communications systems. Among the company’s top investors were donors who raised more than $150,000 for Obama’s political committees, the New York Times reported Wednesday.


5. Obama said he didn’t invest in a qualified blind trust because it wouldn’t enable him to limit which companies he invested in, such as those in the tobacco industry and other areas that he did not want to support.
USATODAY.com - Obama faces questions on his investments


6. Obama with coincidental investment connections. Obama who was an upside down borrower on his condo. Obama who just got a little “boneheaded” advice from convicted felon Tony Rezko when he bought his mansion in Chicago. Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman





7. Skyterra doesn’t ring a bell? Well, how about under its new name: LightSquared? “Reston-based satellite company SkyTerra Communications Inc. re-emerged July 20 as LightSquared,…” SkyTerra, now LightSquared, enters the national 4G race - Washington Business Journal

8. “The liberal Daily Beast reports on a broadband project backed by a frequent Obama White House visitor and donor that has Pentagon officials concerned over potential military GPS interference. The Obama FCC took the lead in intervening on the donor, billionaire hedge fund manager Philip Falcone’s, behalf and granting his company called “LightSquared” one of those coveted Obama waivers from existing law. Then Obama officials reportedly pressured a general to alter his testimony about the company’s impact on military satellite transmissions.” Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?

9. The liberal Daily Beast reports: “Now the Pentagon has been raising concerns about a new wireless project by a satellite broadband company in Virginia called LightSquared, whose majority owner is an investment fund run by Democratic donor Philip Falcone.

Gen. Shelton was originally scheduled to testify Aug. 3 to a House committee that the project would interfere with the military’s sensitive Global Positioning Satellite capabilities, which control automated driving directions and missile targeting, among other things.”
Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?


10. Referee?

Wise up.

Its the way it's supposed to work stupid. P.S. Chaney was a defense contractor and bush was an oil man and they invaded Iraq and raped us.




Talk about stupid!

You don't realize that your post....undocumented, too......supports my point: the government is no "referee."


It should stay out of the free market.
 
So......you hadn't heard of Article I, section 8?

Do you have a point or is this one of those "The general welfare means anything I want it to mean" or one of those "Congress has no power to do these things under the Constitution" derailing posts to ignore the issue of what is or is not good public policy?
 
Referee???

You can't be serious.


1. “On March 3, 2007 USA Today ran a piece on then-Senator Obama regarding two stocks in his portfolio. Obama was running for President and his critics were stating that the Senator may have been involved in insider trading, cronyism, using his position for personal gain, etc. Basically the media ran this story for a day, and then kissed it goodbye. Could you imagine the outrage if these same set of circumstances involved a Republican running for President?”
Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman


2. And, from the original AP story:
WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday he was not aware he had invested in two companies backed by some of his top donors and said he had done nothing to aid their business with the government. The Illinois senator faced questions about more than $50,000 in investments he made right after taking office in 2005 in two speculative companies, AVI Biopharma and Skyterra Communications.



3. Obama purchased $5,000 in shares for AVI, which was developing a drug to treat avian flu. Two weeks after buying the stock, as the disease was spreading in Asia, Obama pushed for more federal funding to fight the disease, but he said he did not discuss the matter with any company officials.



4. Obama also had more than $50,000 in shares of Skyterra, a company that had just received federal permission to create a nationwide wireless network that combined satellite and land-based communications systems. Among the company’s top investors were donors who raised more than $150,000 for Obama’s political committees, the New York Times reported Wednesday.


5. Obama said he didn’t invest in a qualified blind trust because it wouldn’t enable him to limit which companies he invested in, such as those in the tobacco industry and other areas that he did not want to support.
USATODAY.com - Obama faces questions on his investments


6. Obama with coincidental investment connections. Obama who was an upside down borrower on his condo. Obama who just got a little “boneheaded” advice from convicted felon Tony Rezko when he bought his mansion in Chicago. Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman





7. Skyterra doesn’t ring a bell? Well, how about under its new name: LightSquared? “Reston-based satellite company SkyTerra Communications Inc. re-emerged July 20 as LightSquared,…” SkyTerra, now LightSquared, enters the national 4G race - Washington Business Journal

8. “The liberal Daily Beast reports on a broadband project backed by a frequent Obama White House visitor and donor that has Pentagon officials concerned over potential military GPS interference. The Obama FCC took the lead in intervening on the donor, billionaire hedge fund manager Philip Falcone’s, behalf and granting his company called “LightSquared” one of those coveted Obama waivers from existing law. Then Obama officials reportedly pressured a general to alter his testimony about the company’s impact on military satellite transmissions.” Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?

9. The liberal Daily Beast reports: “Now the Pentagon has been raising concerns about a new wireless project by a satellite broadband company in Virginia called LightSquared, whose majority owner is an investment fund run by Democratic donor Philip Falcone.

Gen. Shelton was originally scheduled to testify Aug. 3 to a House committee that the project would interfere with the military’s sensitive Global Positioning Satellite capabilities, which control automated driving directions and missile targeting, among other things.”
Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?


10. Referee?

Wise up.

Its the way it's supposed to work stupid. P.S. Chaney was a defense contractor and bush was an oil man and they invaded Iraq and raped us.




Talk about stupid!

You don't realize that your post....undocumented, too......supports my point: the government is no "referee."


It should stay out of the free market.

No, it should be the referee not in bed with big business. You fools don't realize Citizens United basically handed our country over to the multi national corporations.

They looked at how politicians vote on every issue. In every case they never vote for what the masses want but instead water down what the people want so it is tolerable for big business. Perfect example is healthcare reform.

Listen stupid. If corporations had their way and government didn't step in, 60% of us wouldn't be able to afford good healthcare. Only the rich would be able to afford it.

The government is there to protect the general welfare of the citizens, or at least is should be. There is no arguing this stupid. The government protects us from capitalists.
 
Referee???

You can't be serious.


1. “On March 3, 2007 USA Today ran a piece on then-Senator Obama regarding two stocks in his portfolio. Obama was running for President and his critics were stating that the Senator may have been involved in insider trading, cronyism, using his position for personal gain, etc. Basically the media ran this story for a day, and then kissed it goodbye. Could you imagine the outrage if these same set of circumstances involved a Republican running for President?”
Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman


2. And, from the original AP story:
WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Wednesday he was not aware he had invested in two companies backed by some of his top donors and said he had done nothing to aid their business with the government. The Illinois senator faced questions about more than $50,000 in investments he made right after taking office in 2005 in two speculative companies, AVI Biopharma and Skyterra Communications.



3. Obama purchased $5,000 in shares for AVI, which was developing a drug to treat avian flu. Two weeks after buying the stock, as the disease was spreading in Asia, Obama pushed for more federal funding to fight the disease, but he said he did not discuss the matter with any company officials.



4. Obama also had more than $50,000 in shares of Skyterra, a company that had just received federal permission to create a nationwide wireless network that combined satellite and land-based communications systems. Among the company’s top investors were donors who raised more than $150,000 for Obama’s political committees, the New York Times reported Wednesday.


5. Obama said he didn’t invest in a qualified blind trust because it wouldn’t enable him to limit which companies he invested in, such as those in the tobacco industry and other areas that he did not want to support.
USATODAY.com - Obama faces questions on his investments


6. Obama with coincidental investment connections. Obama who was an upside down borrower on his condo. Obama who just got a little “boneheaded” advice from convicted felon Tony Rezko when he bought his mansion in Chicago. Obama the Investor ? Brian Sussman





7. Skyterra doesn’t ring a bell? Well, how about under its new name: LightSquared? “Reston-based satellite company SkyTerra Communications Inc. re-emerged July 20 as LightSquared,…” SkyTerra, now LightSquared, enters the national 4G race - Washington Business Journal

8. “The liberal Daily Beast reports on a broadband project backed by a frequent Obama White House visitor and donor that has Pentagon officials concerned over potential military GPS interference. The Obama FCC took the lead in intervening on the donor, billionaire hedge fund manager Philip Falcone’s, behalf and granting his company called “LightSquared” one of those coveted Obama waivers from existing law. Then Obama officials reportedly pressured a general to alter his testimony about the company’s impact on military satellite transmissions.” Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?

9. The liberal Daily Beast reports: “Now the Pentagon has been raising concerns about a new wireless project by a satellite broadband company in Virginia called LightSquared, whose majority owner is an investment fund run by Democratic donor Philip Falcone.

Gen. Shelton was originally scheduled to testify Aug. 3 to a House committee that the project would interfere with the military’s sensitive Global Positioning Satellite capabilities, which control automated driving directions and missile targeting, among other things.”
Michelle Malkin | » LightSquared: The next Obama pay-for-play morass?


10. Referee?

Wise up.

Its the way it's supposed to work stupid. P.S. Chaney was a defense contractor and bush was an oil man and they invaded Iraq and raped us.




Talk about stupid!

You don't realize that your post....undocumented, too......supports my point: the government is no "referee."


It should stay out of the free market.

Its supposed to be the referee. It most certainly should not "stay out of it" as corporations turn America into a 3rd world country.
 

Forum List

Back
Top