Gov Abbot to pardon SGT Daniel Perry

[Rust_Cohle]

There you go again queenie.
Hard for retard.

Whatever gets your tiny mushroom blooming.

You think about my mushroom tip often don't ya fag

 

[Rust_Cohle]

So you’re just going to ignore me proving you wrong twice.

I get it. You’re a coward who can’t admit they’re wrong.

No evidence was withheld at trial. The conviction was perfectly lawful.

As for witness tampering, you’re going to have to tell me what they threatened him with. We already determined that the evidence in a grand jury is solely at the discretion of the prosecutor.

You never proved me wrong once..you lie deflect and can't read (cause all the questions you keep asking are in the affidavit)

You're retard

 

[Marener]

You never proved me wrong once..you lie deflect and can't read

No deflections. I directly addressed both of your points which you suddenly don’t want to talk about.

Because you can’t.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

No deflections. I directly addressed both of your points which you suddenly don’t want to talk about.

Because you can’t.

Nope you didn't cause you're right back to asking the same bs that's in the affidavit that you didn't read

Liar

 

[Marener]

Nope you didn't cause you're right back to asking the same bs that's in the affidavit that you didn't read

Liar

The investigator in the affidavit doesn’t say anyone threatened him with anything. He just “felt” a certain way.

The court rules on facts, not feelings.

You seem to have abandoned your other two points after I proved that the prosecutor has no obligation to provide any exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. You now ignore that because you are too cowardly to admit you were clearly wrong.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

The investigator in the affidavit doesn’t say anyone threatened him with anything. He just “felt” a certain way.

The court rules on facts, not feelings.

You seem to have abandoned your other two points after I proved that the prosecutor has no obligation to provide any exculpatory evidence to the grand jury. You now ignore that because you are too cowardly to admit you were clearly wrong.

Its obvious to anyone with a brain that the DA told him to without evidence or else he would have showed all 158 pages and Perry wouldn't have went to trial but by all means keep chasing your tail little retarded doggie

 

[Marener]

Its obvious to anyone with a brain that the DA told him to without evidence or else he would have showed all 158 pages and Perry wouldn't have went to trial but by all means keep chasing your tail little retarded doggie

As I clearly showed, there is no requirement to show exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

As I clearly showed, there is no requirement to show exculpatory evidence to the grand jury.

Right cause "showing evidence that would clear someone" who wants to see that at a TRIAL LOL

Idiot

 

[Moonglow]

A peaceful protestor with an AK-47 .. with no intention of creating intimidation with that weapon. Exactly. Intimidation which would result in aggravated assault. Minorities are incapable of producing such results though.

Which is not a crime if yer white.

 

[Marener]

Right cause "showing evidence that would clear someone" who wants to see that at a TRIAL LOL

Idiot

If a prosecutor wants to play with fire by holding back important evidence at the grand jury, that’s their problem. They will lose at trial when that evidence is shown.

The problem for your story is that the prosecutor didn’t lose at trial.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

If a prosecutor wants to play with fire by holding back important evidence at the grand jury, that’s their problem. They will lose at trial when that evidence is shown.

The problem for your story is that the prosecutor didn’t lose at trial.

That's what happened idiot and its procedural misconduct

Fuck

Took you all this time to get here now watch you say something else stupid

 

[Marener]

That's what happened idiot and its procedural misconduct

Fuck

Took you all this time to get here now watch you say something else stupid

Procedural misconduct is a big word for someone who clearly has no idea what they’re talking about.

My link showed that it’s perfectly legal for the prosecutor to withhold evidence from a grand jury. So clearly it’s not misconduct.

Not to mention it clearly wasn’t exculpatory because they still got the conviction.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

Procedural misconduct is a big word for someone who clearly has no idea what they’re talking about.

My link showed that it’s perfectly legal for the prosecutor to withhold evidence from a grand jury. So clearly it’s not misconduct.

Not to mention it clearly wasn’t exculpatory because they still got the conviction.

Prosecutorial Misconduct - When The State Abuses Its Power

Prosecutorial misconduct is when a prosecutor in a criminal court case behaves in an illegal or unethical manner, often aimed at securing a wrongful conviction.

www.shouselaw.com

Oh wow look at that

Dumbass the exculpatory evidence WASN'T ALLOWED TO BE SHOWN

You fucking retard

Durrrrr

 

[Marener]

Dumbass the exculpatory evidence WASN'T ALLOWED TO BE SHOWN

It wasn’t shown to the grand jury, where there is no requirement for it to be shown.

Your link doesn’t refer to grand juries.

If they had withheld exculpatory evidence at trial, you’d have a point.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

It wasn’t shown to the grand jury, where there is no requirement for it to be shown.

Your link doesn’t refer to grand juries.

If they had withheld exculpatory evidence at trial, you’d have a point.

(YOU)

 

[Marener]

View attachment 775243

(YOU)

Pathetic.

You still can’t figure out the difference between grand juries and trial juries.

Evidence was not withheld from trial and he was convicted anyway. That’s a fact you will never acknowledge.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

Pathetic.

You still can’t figure out the difference between grand juries and trial juries.

Evidence was not withheld from trial and he was convicted anyway. That’s a fact you will never acknowledge.

Already discussed

(YOU)

 

[Marener]

Already discussed

Your attempt to do so was incorrect due to your misunderstanding of the judicial system.

I corrected you and you’ve since tried to ignore it.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

Your attempt to do so was incorrect due to your misunderstanding of the judicial system.

I corrected you and you’ve since tried to ignore it.

LOL errrrr wrong again

 

[Marener]

LOL errrrr wrong again

You claim I’m wrong, yet you don’t provide a rebuttal.

Probably because you can’t.