Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Right...And that many of the the former employees are out working as private contractors for $50.00/hr on house calls has nothing to do with it.
No, I don't wanna buy a bridge.
Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.In case you missed it, the onus of proof isn't upon the C of C.
This still isn't Soviet Russia.
You're right. Soviet Russia doesn't have laws like we do, preventing foreign money being spent on US elections.
Why does the C of C refuse to show which money went where? What are they hiding? Why no transparency? Why the secrecy?
They don't offer any proof, just a denial, and those of us who aren't sheep don't suck it all up like idiots.
Yeah, just like was done to Gary Condit!!!Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.In case you missed it, the onus of proof isn't upon the C of C.
This still isn't Soviet Russia.
You're right. Soviet Russia doesn't have laws like we do, preventing foreign money being spent on US elections.
Why does the C of C refuse to show which money went where? What are they hiding? Why no transparency? Why the secrecy?
They don't offer any proof, just a denial, and those of us who aren't sheep don't suck it all up like idiots.
While Obama and his dumbass followers such as you try to make hay out of this, and of course fail -- 22 million unemployed are getting ready to go to the polls in November, dumbass.While I'm gone, TP has done some pretty extensive reporting on the Chamber.. Here's some links if you'll even take your head outta your ass long enough to read them:
IT'S JOBS STUPID
and there would be another 2 million jobs lost if we didn't bail out the auto industry.
and if the repubs were so good at job creation why were the numbers so bad when you ran everything?
Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.In case you missed it, the onus of proof isn't upon the C of C.
This still isn't Soviet Russia.
You're right. Soviet Russia doesn't have laws like we do, preventing foreign money being spent on US elections.
Why does the C of C refuse to show which money went where? What are they hiding? Why no transparency? Why the secrecy?
They don't offer any proof, just a denial, and those of us who aren't sheep don't suck it all up like idiots.
So tell us what law was passed over the GOP's record number of filibusters and Bush's veto pen that went into effect in Jan '07???????While Obama and his dumbass followers such as you try to make hay out of this, and of course fail -- 22 million unemployed are getting ready to go to the polls in November, dumbass.
IT'S JOBS STUPID
and there would be another 2 million jobs lost if we didn't bail out the auto industry.
and if the repubs were so good at job creation why were the numbers so bad when you ran everything?
Really? Unemployment has more than doubled since Democrats took control of Congress in Jan of 07 Jillian.
Reagan owned the economy from the time his Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA) passed in 1981 giving us the Reagan Recession.Did Reagan "own" the economy in 1981-1982, or did his predecessor, Carter?
2009 is not 2007! The CON$ in this thread said the unemployment rate doubled since the Dems took control of Congress in Jan 2007.Obama did now own the economy when Stimulus passed in 2009?
Did the Democrats own the economy in Jan 2007 as CON$ claim?Did Obama own the economy in 2009 as Reagan did in 1981?
Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.In case you missed it, the onus of proof isn't upon the C of C.
This still isn't Soviet Russia.
You're right. Soviet Russia doesn't have laws like we do, preventing foreign money being spent on US elections.
Why does the C of C refuse to show which money went where? What are they hiding? Why no transparency? Why the secrecy?
They don't offer any proof, just a denial, and those of us who aren't sheep don't suck it all up like idiots.
That is not the argument CON$ use against Planned Parenthood regarding money used for abortion.Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.You're right. Soviet Russia doesn't have laws like we do, preventing foreign money being spent on US elections.
Why does the C of C refuse to show which money went where? What are they hiding? Why no transparency? Why the secrecy?
They don't offer any proof, just a denial, and those of us who aren't sheep don't suck it all up like idiots.
Until the law forces them to disclose, there cannot be any proof. It's illegal to use foriegn funding for campaign ads. The Chamber gets money from China and India and other countries. $800,000 worth. And they also fund campaign ads. Now they have to show us which money went where.
Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.You're right. Soviet Russia doesn't have laws like we do, preventing foreign money being spent on US elections.
Why does the C of C refuse to show which money went where? What are they hiding? Why no transparency? Why the secrecy?
They don't offer any proof, just a denial, and those of us who aren't sheep don't suck it all up like idiots.
Until the law forces them to disclose, there cannot be any proof. It's illegal to use foriegn funding for campaign ads. The Chamber gets money from China and India and other countries. $800,000 worth. And they also fund campaign ads. Now they have to show us which money went where.
Did Reagan "own" the economy in 1981-1982, or did his predecessor, Carter?
Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.
Until the law forces them to disclose, there cannot be any proof. It's illegal to use foriegn funding for campaign ads. The Chamber gets money from China and India and other countries. $800,000 worth. And they also fund campaign ads. Now they have to show us which money went where.
Um, no, they don't. They aer audited every year. Since Obama has already illegally obtained their tax returns from the IRS and would have told us if there was something real.
Using your criteria, the local police should just get to barge into your house and search the premises for cocaine, on the mere say-so of a neighbor who doesn't like you.Because in America the onus of proof is upon those making the charge, tovarich.You're right. Soviet Russia doesn't have laws like we do, preventing foreign money being spent on US elections.
Why does the C of C refuse to show which money went where? What are they hiding? Why no transparency? Why the secrecy?
They don't offer any proof, just a denial, and those of us who aren't sheep don't suck it all up like idiots.
Until the law forces them to disclose, there cannot be any proof. It's illegal to use foriegn funding for campaign ads. The Chamber gets money from China and India and other countries. $800,000 worth. And they also fund campaign ads. Now they have to show us which money went where.
