GOP blocks Obama's bid to end oil subsidies

no one should be surprised that Republicans care more about oil companies then they do actual Americans
 
no one should be surprised that Republicans care more about oil companies then they do actual Americans

No one is surprised you don't know what you are talking about.

taxes.jpg
 
Senate Republicans Thursday shot down President Obama's plan to cut off oil companies' tax breaks.

GOP blocks Obama's bid to end oil subsidies - CBS News

Even giving oil companies billions in subsidies hasn't brought down gas prices.

What is the Republican Plan?

GOP plan is to keep giving corporations trillions in welfare getting kickbacks while blaming the problems of trailer park republicans on the poor black man getting a few dollars a month.
 
If you're a fiscal conservative like me, than you should have a problem with all welfare, including corporate welfare.

Strategic investments that can help bring something along and into the marketplace is fine with me, but handing tens of billions every year to oil companies just doesn't make sense.

It doesn't solve the entire deficit picture, but it's another piece of a puzzle to help put us back on more solid fiscal ground.
 
If you're a fiscal conservative like me, than you should have a problem with all welfare, including corporate welfare.

Strategic investments that can help bring something along and into the marketplace is fine with me, but handing tens of billions every year to oil companies just doesn't make sense.


It doesn't solve the entire deficit picture, but it's another piece of a puzzle to help put us back on more solid fiscal ground.

Still waiting :neutral:
 
Which oil subsidies?

C'mon...Start naming them.

United States military deployments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Environmental Law Institute
http://www.epa.gov/sectors/pdf/oil-gas-report.pdf

The US gives massive subsidies to the oil companies via providing security, cheap fees for land use, tax breaks, infrastructure and a host of other goodies.

wiki linked article does not even contain the word "oil" or "subsidy".

epa document is totally unrelated to this thread

ELI story is gloss and dodge rhetoric lacking detail or support

Maybe you can pick out some relevence for us from these links?
 
Which oil subsidies?

C'mon...Start naming them.

United States military deployments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Environmental Law Institute
http://www.epa.gov/sectors/pdf/oil-gas-report.pdf

The US gives massive subsidies to the oil companies via providing security, cheap fees for land use, tax breaks, infrastructure and a host of other goodies.

wiki linked article does not even contain the word "oil" or "subsidy".

epa document is totally unrelated to this thread

ELI story is gloss and dodge rhetoric lacking detail or support

Maybe you can pick out some relevence for us from these links?

Oh really?

The United States has been using it's military to knock over countries in the middle east and install friendly governments. It isn't doing that because it likes Humus. It's doing that to exploit the natural resources of the region. Namely oil. I'd say that counts as a subsidy.

Additionally the epa documents land use by oil companies. Which generally comes on the cheap..another subsidy.

So along with providing all sorts of goodies..it grants some very profitable companies tax breaks. Some of the breaks have the government owing Oil companies, money.

It's disgusting.
 
Yes, the GOP loves WELFARE for their favorite corporations, no doubt.

The DEMS love the WELFARE for their favorite corporations, too.
 
United States military deployments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Environmental Law Institute
http://www.epa.gov/sectors/pdf/oil-gas-report.pdf

The US gives massive subsidies to the oil companies via providing security, cheap fees for land use, tax breaks, infrastructure and a host of other goodies.

wiki linked article does not even contain the word "oil" or "subsidy".

epa document is totally unrelated to this thread

ELI story is gloss and dodge rhetoric lacking detail or support

Maybe you can pick out some relevence for us from these links?

Oh really?

The United States has been using it's military to knock over countries in the middle east and install friendly governments. It isn't doing that because it likes Humus. It's doing that to exploit the natural resources of the region. Namely oil. I'd say that counts as a subsidy.

Additionally the epa documents land use by oil companies. Which generally comes on the cheap..another subsidy.

So along with providing all sorts of goodies..it grants some very profitable companies tax breaks. Some of the breaks have the government owing Oil companies, money.

It's disgusting.

The military intervention spiel is an absurd stretch. Even having a presence in or near oil deposits or transportation lanes does absolutely nothing for our domestic oil industry. Sure, world political and military tensions can raise oil prices but that would happen with or without our presence.

Public lands access by industry is heavily restricted and overly regulated. And it's certainly not cheap. The Fed reaps tens of millions of dollars each year whether drilling takes place or not. Royalties equal more tens of billions of dollars to the Treasury each year.

The "tax breaks" you reference are no different than those afforded other industries.

You are a petrophobe. THAT'S disgusting. :)
 
Senate Republicans Thursday shot down President Obama's plan to cut off oil companies' tax breaks.

GOP blocks Obama's bid to end oil subsidies - CBS News

Even giving oil companies billions in subsidies hasn't brought down gas prices.

What is the Republican Plan?

freedombecki's unspin machine:

Oh, jolly! Those mean Republicans won't let Obama raise gasoline prices to $5.00 a gallon, let's all eat a can o' worms!

:lmao:
 
Last edited:
It's a political trick. Barry could have ended oil subsidies at the stroke of a pen when he had a majority in both houses but he didn't want to do it then and he doesn't want to do it now.
 
It's a political trick. Barry could have ended oil subsidies at the stroke of a pen when he had a majority in both houses but he didn't want to do it then and he doesn't want to do it now.

There are too many oil-state Democrats who actually understand the industry.
And by "understand" I mean knowing what it takes to operate throughout the spectrum of businesses involved.
 

Forum List

Back
Top