Global Warming Scandal Makes Scientific Progress More Difficult, Experts Say

[WillowTree]

The trustworthiness of the scientific community's global warming data pool is being called into question as the scandal over doctored data continues to unfold.

The latest revelation came on Sunday with the publication of a report by The Sunday Times of London that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit in the United Kingdom confessed to throwing out most of the raw temperature data on which the theory of global warming is founded.

The loss of the data prevents other scientists from checking it to determine whether, in fact, there has been a long-term rise in global temperatures during the past century and a half.

"They are making scientific progress more difficult now," says Willie Soon, a physicist, astronomer and climate researcher at the solar and stellar physics division of the Harvard University-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "This is a shameful, dark day for science," he said in an interview with FoxNews.com.

Soon also suggested that there has been systemic suppression of dissenting opinion among scientists in the climate change community, ranging from social snubs to e-mail stalking and even threats of harm.








Global Warming Scandal Makes Scientific Progress More Difficult, Experts Say - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News - FOXNews.com







that sound's like the way libtards operate!

 

[Meister]

The common sense thinkers knew this had to be going on from the start. The cult had an agenda and the non thinkers that drank the Kool-Aid went a long with it, open eyed. Several on this board are right in the mix with the cult religion.

 

[Oddball]

Every honest scientist who has had contact with IPCC, CRU, NCAR and/or Penn State should have smoke blowing out their ears right about now.

 

[Jay Canuck]

Scientific progress will not be more difficult - the results and explaining them to the public will....and that was exactly what all the paid media deniers, large oil companies, oil barons and partisan hacks want. Although some in the public are buying the media inuendo the majority of the public still trusts that when a vast majority of the worlds scientists generally agree that man-made climate change is a reality it is.

 

[Oddball]

Yeah...The "deniers" are responsible for people who destroyed their fudged numbers!

If Einstein and Tesla were only alive today.

 

[Meister]

Scientific progress will not be more difficult - the results and explaining them to the public will....and that was exactly what all the paid media deniers, large oil companies, oil barons and partisan hacks want. Although some in the public are buying the media inuendo the majority of the public still trusts that when a vast majority of the worlds scientists generally agree that man-made climate change is a reality it is.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Scientific progress will not be more difficult - the results and explaining them to the public will....and that was exactly what all the paid media deniers, large oil companies, oil barons and partisan hacks want. Although some in the public are buying the media inuendo the majority of the public still trusts that when a vast majority of the worlds scientists generally agree that man-made climate change is a reality it is.

So a vast majority in agreement is the make-or-break reasoning on whether AGW is real or not?

 

[Zoom-boing]

The response from the defenders of Mr. Mann and his circle has been that even if they did disparage doubters and exclude contrary points of view, theirs is still the best climate science. The proof for this is circular. It's the best, we're told, because it's the most-published and most-cited—in that same peer-reviewed literature. The public has every reason to ask why they felt the need to rig the game if their science is as indisputable as they claim.

Climate Change Emails Reveal Rigged 'Consensus' - WSJ.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Scientific progress will not be more difficult - the results and explaining them to the public will....and that was exactly what all the paid media deniers, large oil companies, oil barons and partisan hacks want. Although some in the public are buying the media inuendo the majority of the public still trusts that when a vast majority of the worlds scientists generally agree that man-made climate change is a reality it is.

Dear Diary,

So glad I learned so much from Al Gore!

I just donated all my winter clothes and boots to charity, and
Stocked up on pith helmets and sandals at Banana Republic.

 

[Meister]

The response from the defenders of Mr. Mann and his circle has been that even if they did disparage doubters and exclude contrary points of view, theirs is still the best climate science. The proof for this is circular. It's the best, we're told, because it's the most-published and most-cited—in that same peer-reviewed literature. The public has every reason to ask why they felt the need to rig the game if their science is as indisputable as they claim.

Climate Change Emails Reveal Rigged 'Consensus' - WSJ.com

Zoom, please don't clutter up Canuck (our troll from the north) with all these facts. It just confuses him, and he gets more things mixed up in that head of his, it just perpetuates the problem.

 

[Xenophon]

Maybe Al Gore can make a new documentary, 'a very convient deletion.'

 

[Zoom-boing]

The response from the defenders of Mr. Mann and his circle has been that even if they did disparage doubters and exclude contrary points of view, theirs is still the best climate science. The proof for this is circular. It's the best, we're told, because it's the most-published and most-cited—in that same peer-reviewed literature. The public has every reason to ask why they felt the need to rig the game if their science is as indisputable as they claim.

Climate Change Emails Reveal Rigged 'Consensus' - WSJ.com

Zoom, please don't clutter up Canuck (our troll from the north) with all these facts. It just confuses him, and he gets more things mixed up in that head of his, it just perpetuates the problem.

Confuse a Canuck . . . sounds like a fun drinking game.

 

[saveliberty]

The trustworthiness of the scientific community's global warming data pool is being called into question as the scandal over doctored data continues to unfold.

The latest revelation came on Sunday with the publication of a report by The Sunday Times of London that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit in the United Kingdom confessed to throwing out most of the raw temperature data on which the theory of global warming is founded.

The loss of the data prevents other scientists from checking it to determine whether, in fact, there has been a long-term rise in global temperatures during the past century and a half.

"They are making scientific progress more difficult now," says Willie Soon, a physicist, astronomer and climate researcher at the solar and stellar physics division of the Harvard University-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "This is a shameful, dark day for science," he said in an interview with FoxNews.com.

Soon also suggested that there has been systemic suppression of dissenting opinion among scientists in the climate change community, ranging from social snubs to e-mail stalking and even threats of harm.


Global Warming Scandal Makes Scientific Progress More Difficult, Experts Say - Science News | Science & Technology | Technology News - FOXNews.com

that sound's like the way libtards operate!

That data might have been important for a number of scientific projects. I am sure some government paid for the research too. Destruction of government property is a crime. At least the British came clean. Now its your turn Mr Gore.

 

[Meister]

Climate Change Emails Reveal Rigged 'Consensus' - WSJ.com

Zoom, please don't clutter up Canuck (our troll from the north) with all these facts. It just confuses him, and he gets more things mixed up in that head of his, it just perpetuates the problem.

Confuse a Canuck . . . sounds like a fun drinking game.

Sounds like a simple game.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Maybe Al Gore can make a new documentary, 'a very convient deletion.'

 

[Jay Canuck]

the above posts directed at my statement by our boards partisan hacks only contain insult and inuendo - and that is there last refuge.... what else are they are left with?

 

[Meister]

Scientific progress will not be more difficult - the results and explaining them to the public will....and that was exactly what all the paid media deniers, large oil companies, oil barons and partisan hacks want. Although some in the public are buying the media inuendo the majority of the public still trusts that when a vast majority of the worlds scientists generally agree that man-made climate change is a reality it is.

Maybe this is why you take a shellacking nearly everytime you post, Canuck. You don't know what the hell your talking about. people feel your talking out your ass, and you seemingly prove it.

The latest Pew poll on global warming shows a large drop in the percentage of Americans who say there is solid evidence that global temperatures are rising, from 71% down to only 57% in the last 18 months. And global warming due to human activity? The overall numbers have declined from 47% to 36%.
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/3579/...-houses-than-manmade-global-warming--37-vs-36

Hardly the vast majority of the public.

 

[Zander]

There is a consensus!!!! That is the end of the debate!! STFU You deniers!! Global warming is a new religion for the godless and now "Mother Earth" is going to punish you all for your blasphemy!!!! Apostates!!!!

 

[Jay Canuck]

climate depot! - sure!.... kind of like Home Depot for deniers.

 

[Jay Canuck]

New public opinion poll on global warming

Filed under:

• Climate Science
• RC Forum
• Reporting on climate

— gavin @ 23 August 2006
There is a new Zogby poll on public attitudes in the US towards global warming and the potential connection between severe weather events and climate change.
Unsurprisingly to us (but maybe not to others), most of the US public feel that global warming is happening (around 70%), and roughly the same amount of people report being more or much more convinced of this over the last two years.

RealClimate: New public opinion poll on global warming