Lewdog
Gold Member
I just wanted to put this here for all those that deny Global Warming and man-made climate change.
Physicist explaining climate change to a denier on TV is grim viewing
Earth's hottest month on record was July 2016: NASA
For those too lazy to watch the video in the link here is a clip and a full video:
And for those wondering what Brian Cox's credentials are:
Brian Cox - Biography, Facts and Pictures
He used a chart that is based on falsified data, so that's a non starter, and regardless of his professional accomplishments, which are significant, his "evidence" for AGW are not empirically based. They are based on falsified data and correlation. In other words he's making a fundamental error in science.
I just wanted to put this here for all those that deny Global Warming and man-made climate change.
Physicist explaining climate change to a denier on TV is grim viewing
Earth's hottest month on record was July 2016: NASA
For those too lazy to watch the video in the link here is a clip and a full video:
And for those wondering what Brian Cox's credentials are:
Brian Cox - Biography, Facts and Pictures
looks like he was told by the other dude quite well. No empirical evidence. He had nice fudged charts which is not empirical. you should all learn the definition of the word and come back when you can find some.
You guys can't be serious? How can you possibly deny something that is believed to be true by a VAST majority of the most well educated scientist in the world? We are emitting CO2 in record numbers while continuing to decrease the amount of trees on our planet that clean the CO2 out of the air and provide us with clean oxygen.
I mean it isn't even close when it comes ot the number of scientist that believe in global warming. Most people attribute it to 97% which is rated mostly true by Politfact: None
...and the best argument you can come up with... is they are using falsified data, from NASA and GISS? I'd REALLY like to know how and why you think that data is falsified.
Ummmm, because we can prove that the data is falsified would be my guess. Here is just one Federal Lab that has been shut down due to data falsification. There are more to come.
USGS finds data fraud, closes chemistry lab
Misconduct has led to delays and 1 retraction in environmental quality measurements reports
More than $100M worth of research may be tainted by govt lab misconduct - Retraction Watch
And then we have this....
NASA Exposed In ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud
Published on November 24, 2015
"From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.”
NASA Exposed in ‘Massive’ New Climate Data Fraud - Principia Scientific International
Yeah that makes sense... so top scientist even to this day are quoting data that was "proven" to falsified? REALLY? Do you REALLY think top scientist would ruin their own reputation publicly using data..TODAY, in 2016, if it was proven in 2015 that the data was falsified and not correct? REALLY? You have to be joking right? You can't possibly be serious?
You are engaging in a logical fallacy called "Appeal to Authority". I suggest you look it up. Whenever that is your sole argument you are losing. Just sayin...
How is it a logical fallacy to use common sense? So what's your expertise on climate change? What you've read on forums? Do you have a PH D in any kind of science field? Have you done any type of field research? I mean seriously... you are saying you know more than 97% of the top scientist in the world? You are saying that highly educated individuals in their field of study would use scientific data that you say has been positively disproved for over year?