Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
From two days ago. Read & discuss.
This is why the Dems need to get rid of Trump.
The court make-up will halt legislating from the bench.
It also neutralizes Roberts. Roberts has shown a trend to worry
about how "his" court is perceived. He has proven to go against
his own beliefs to protect "his" court.
Trump replacing Ginsberg makes Roberts' vote moot.
It should be pointed out that Breyers is approaching 81 and the
2nd oldest on the court. He won't make it thru a second Trump
term.
Trump is replacing Justices, with late 40 early 50-year olds.
If he gets to replacer both Ginsburg and Breyers and if Alito
and Thomas were to step down before he was out of office.
Trump could make it a minimum of a conservative 5-4 court
for the next 40 years.
Oh no! But how will five unelected lawyers get to impose their override on the Constitution thwarting the clear opposing will of the majority of the People then?!The court make-up will halt legislating from the bench.
Ok. Thanks for that. But what are your thoughts on the situation?The blog post did not originate by a member of the court or any of their law clerks.
It came from an outside source and has no comments as to why it was posted.
It is NOT an opinion of any member of SCOTUS.
Weird of you to say, since it is precisely what you want.The court make-up will halt legislating from the bench.
I hope that is exactly what they do.this is really the biggest story out there
my guess is that Dems in the House are waiting for RBG to retire (one way or another) before they start fallacious impeachment proceedings in an effort to push a narrative that ' a POTUS under impeachment cannot select a SCOTUS judge"
this is really the biggest story out there
my guess is that Dems in the House are waiting for RBG to retire (one way or another) before they start fallacious impeachment proceedings in an effort to push a narrative that ' a POTUS under impeachment cannot select a SCOTUS judge"
she made it clear last summer (I think, pretty sure there is a long thread on it on this board) that she intends to stay until after the 2020 election in the hopes that Trump is defeatedThen time is of the essence. For the good of the nation, LITUS intelligence could investigate the prognosis of Ginsburg’s recovery & press her for a statement as to her intentions. ASAP
this is really the biggest story out there
my guess is that Dems in the House are waiting for RBG to retire (one way or another) before they start fallacious impeachment proceedings in an effort to push a narrative that ' a POTUS under impeachment cannot select a SCOTUS judge"
Then time is of the essence. For the good of the nation, POTUS intelligence could investigate the prognosis of Ginsburg’s recovery & press her for a statement as to her intentions. ASAP
Even if she is in a permanent vegetative state or dead?she made it clear last summer (I think, pretty sure there is a long thread on it on this board) that she intends to stay until after the 2020 election in the hopes that Trump is defeatedThen time is of the essence. For the good of the nation, LITUS intelligence could investigate the prognosis of Ginsburg’s recovery & press her for a statement as to her intentions. ASAP
this should surprise no one
If they think they can get away with hiding the body,they will do itEven if she is in a permanent vegetative state or dead?
If they think they can get away with hiding the body,they will do itEven if she is in a permanent vegetative state or dead?
They would if they controlled the SenateIf they think they can get away with hiding the body,they will do itEven if she is in a permanent vegetative state or dead?
They wouldn't refuse to even meet the President's appointee or vote on his nomination for over a year so as to "steal" the nomination, would they?