George Floyd's brother Philonise: "I just want to reiterate: not just black lives matter, all lives matter."

Did you miss the fact that "blue lives" refers to police officers who happen to be every possible 'race' you can fabricate?

No I didn’t miss that. Isn’t that obvious?

Police officers are obviously all different races.
 
The difference between an occupation and a race is perfectly clear to everyone. :itsok:
Everyone but YOU, it seems.

You think I don’t know the difference between an occupation and a race.

Hmm ok then.
Occupation is what the chozen do for land and housing in the M.E.
Race is what Da nigga do when dem red lights be flashin
Socialism enters when the bail is set at $50
Capitalism enters when they realize he needs a chosen attorney (NOT appointed)
 
Would you care to revisit your original comment on the matter?

My original comment doesn't say that police officers only come in one race.

Police officers obviously come in all different races.
Which may be one reason that Black Lives Matter are sometimes told All Lives Matter which refers to lives of all races.

The parallel counter to Blue Lives Matter would be Lives of all occupations matter. That being said, not all occupations have a color association.
'
Of course if you do not attempt to "read between the lines" a little, you will never find the answer to your question or accept anyone else's answer.
 
Why don't you clearly state what the point of your original comment was?

I explained it a few times. I thought it was self-explanatory. I guess not. I'll try one last time.

"Black lives matter" is countered with "all lives matter". The counter-argument is that "black lives matter" excludes everyone who isn't black and that we all matter.

"Blue lives matter" is not countered with "all lives matter". By the same reasoning, shouldn't the counter-argument be that "blue lives matter" excludes everyone who isn't a police officer (who obviously come in all races). Don't we ALL matter even though we are not all police officers?
 
Would you care to revisit your original comment on the matter?

My original comment doesn't say that police officers only come in one race.

Police officers obviously come in all different races.
Which may be one reason that Black Lives Matter are sometimes told All Lives Matter which refers to lives of all races.

The parallel counter to Blue Lives Matter would be Lives of all occupations matter. That being said, not all occupations have a color association.
'
Of course if you do not attempt to "read between the lines" a little, you will never find the answer to your question or accept anyone else's answer.
It is the expectation of anyone making a claim that they can support it, or will withdraw it.
 
The parallel counter to Blue Lives Matter would be Lives of all occupations matter. That being said, not all occupations have a color association.

Sure. "All occupations matter" would be a suitable counter-argument but "all lives matter" still applies.

There doesn't need to be a color association for this.
 
Why don't you clearly state what the point of your original comment was?

I explained it a few times. I thought it was self-explanatory. I guess not. I'll try one last time.

"Black lives matter" is countered with "all lives matter". The counter-argument is that "black lives matter" excludes everyone who isn't black and that we all matter.

"Blue lives matter" is not countered with "all lives matter". By the same reasoning, shouldn't the counter-argument be that "blue lives matter" excludes everyone who isn't a police officer (who obviously come in all races). Don't we ALL matter even though we are not all police officers?
You are still trying to compare apples and oranges.
 
You are still trying to compare apples and oranges.

I disagree.

If "Black lives matter" excludes non-black people then "Blue lives matter" excludes non-police officers (who obviously come in all different races).

The question isn't if there is a difference between race and occupation, but if these statements are excluding or not. I don't see how one excludes while the other does not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top