General "BetrayUS" is now Petrayus again?

If moveon.org represents all Liberals, then Free Republic, World Net Daily, and the Canada Free Press represent all Conservatives. What's that? Conservatives don't like being all grouped together under one website? Imagine that. :rolleyes:



Moveon.org and Dailykooks have alot more influence in Democratic party than those mags you mentioned do in the GOP. Not even close.

Interesting thing is that you won't be honest about your own opinion of "Betrayus" then and now... you will continue to deflect.

If I read correct Modbert is only 19 (younger than my oldest), which means I doubt he did have an opinion on Patraeus. (Again, if I'm wrong on that, my bad)

He probably isn't even aware of the history.

19 is too young to have a double standard. He's still developing the first standard, so cut him some slack. ;)
 
This is a political question, not about the military.

Remember the NYTimes ad calling Petrayus, "Betrayus?"

Remember the Democrats that called him a liar about the surge?

Now all of a sudden, all that gets flushed down the memory hole and Obama has made this wonderful choice?

I've heard rumors that Moveon, has deleted the "Betrayus" ad from their website and google has deleted it from their cache!

Are liberals this openly hypocritical that they think they can pretend "Betrayus" never happened and we all will forget the very recent past?

I can't be the only one who remembers Democrats calling Petrayus a liar on the surge.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

Has it been erased from you tube?


Wouldn't surprise me a bit. They are trying to flush the entire thing down the memory hole.

I have found these websites:

General Betrayus .::. General David Betrayus

Wikipedia hasn't flushed their stuff down the memory hole, yet. They are still covering how NYTimes had the ad:

MoveOn.org ad controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RedState has screenshots of the Betrayus Ad before Moveon took it down!

MoveOn.org Memory Holes ‘General Betray Us.’ | RedState

:lol::lol::lol:
 
Hell, I thought that MoveOn ad was stupid and childish, and I know I'm not the only lib who thought so.


IOW, you can take your broad brush on this subject and shove it sideways, Nonelitist.

Yeah, liberals always want to play this crap and pretend it never happened.

But can you explain the Democrats who went right along with it and called Patraeus, in so many words a liar about the surge???

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkMtND7HPH0[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjcTb2ORVd0[/ame]

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yG83rSm6fY[/ame]
 
Last edited:
I stopped reading the NY Slimes a long time ago. The Socialist/Progressive nutters have destroyed that once great paper. No on should ever forget or forgive their BetrayUs/Moveon.org disgrace.
 
Same challenge to the idiots in this thread that was handed out to the idiots in the other thread:

I invite you all to search the archives of this site for the word "Betrayus" and show me first hand that "Betrayus" was how he was referred to by "liberals in general."

Ok go!
 
This is a political question, not about the military.

Remember the NYTimes ad calling Petrayus, "Betrayus?"

Remember the Democrats that called him a liar about the surge?

Now all of a sudden, all that gets flushed down the memory hole and Obama has made this wonderful choice?

I've heard rumors that Moveon, has deleted the "Betrayus" ad from their website and google has deleted it from their cache!

Are liberals this openly hypocritical that they think they can pretend "Betrayus" never happened and we all will forget the very recent past?

I can't be the only one who remembers Democrats calling Petrayus a liar on the surge.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

How about you learn how to spell his fucking name correctly first before bitching?
 
Same challenge to the idiots in this thread that was handed out to the idiots in the other thread:

I invite you all to search the archives of this site for the word "Betrayus" and show me first hand that "Betrayus" was how he was referred to by "liberals in general."

Ok go!

Search term: Betrayus. Posts 2 weeks ago and older (to help sort the wheat from the chaff). User results:

Mascale, ABikerSailor, sealybobo and doniston.

Not they speak for liberals in general. I'm not disagreeing with your overall point. Thats not why I went looking. I was just bored and wanted to see exactly who did it. There were others, on the left and right, who used the term as well. But they were using it in reference to the controversy. The 4 I listed are the only ones who took the moveon.org ball and ran with it, using the term in reference to the general in a derogatory manner. By far the worst offender was mascale. The first page of search hits was nearly all him.
 
If I read correct Modbert is only 19 (younger than my oldest), which means I doubt he did have an opinion on Patraeus. (Again, if I'm wrong on that, my bad)

He probably isn't even aware of the history.

19 is too young to have a double standard. He's still developing the first standard, so cut him some slack. ;)

What? You obviously didn't see the three threads I made about him previously. I didn't have a opinion about him in 2006, but I sure as hell did in 2008.
 
Modbert, was I right in reading you are only 19? If I'm wrong, I'm sorry.

It's kind of hard debating with someone younger than my own KID on this because I end up having to educate insteading of debate.

But NYTimes cut their own price on a full page ad in the NYTimes to allow Moveon's Betrayus ad.

THEN there was Durbin, Hillary, and the plethora of liberal Democrats who called Patraeus a liar to his face during the hearings (or whatever they called them).

You are only 19? I bet I dime you don't remember this, and I wouldn't expect you to, because that would make you only 15/16 when it happened.

So, trust me, IT WAS ALL OF LIBERALISM.

Moveon was just doing the bidding of the Democrat party.

Maybe you wouldn't know that, because you don't even know WHY Moveon was created, because when that happened my kid was only eight years old, and you were what? Five, six, maybe seven?

I wouldn't expect you to know.

Move on was about "moving on" from Bill Clinton's sexcapades ala Monica Lewinsky, Juanita Broaderick and was funded (and probably still is) by George Soros.

Hardly the fringe outfit you want to claim it is.

:rofl: What a maroon, I don't need to be educated on this, especially from you. You have no idea what Liberalism is in the first place, never less you defining who Liberals are.
 
Same challenge to the idiots in this thread that was handed out to the idiots in the other thread:

I invite you all to search the archives of this site for the word "Betrayus" and show me first hand that "Betrayus" was how he was referred to by "liberals in general."

Ok go!

Search term: Betrayus. Posts 2 weeks ago and older (to help sort the wheat from the chaff). User results:

Mascale, ABikerSailor, sealybobo and doniston.

Not they speak for liberals in general. I'm not disagreeing with your overall point. Thats not why I went looking. I was just bored and wanted to see exactly who did it. There were others, on the left and right, who used the term as well. But they were using it in reference to the controversy. The 4 I listed are the only ones who took the moveon.org ball and ran with it, using the term in reference to the general in a derogatory manner. By far the worst offender was mascale. The first page of search hits was nearly all him.

Thank you, my brotha!

And for the record, I'm not trying to claim some moral high ground here or anything. I mean, I'm in another thread wishing for Dick Cheney's heart to explode ferchristsakes. I just want to set the record straight here as to who was actually calling that man "Betrayus" and how little it was embraced and repeated by "liberals."
 
Same challenge to the idiots in this thread that was handed out to the idiots in the other thread:

I invite you all to search the archives of this site for the word "Betrayus" and show me first hand that "Betrayus" was how he was referred to by "liberals in general."

Ok go!

Search term: Betrayus. Posts 2 weeks ago and older (to help sort the wheat from the chaff). User results:

Mascale, ABikerSailor, sealybobo and doniston.

Not they speak for liberals in general. I'm not disagreeing with your overall point. Thats not why I went looking. I was just bored and wanted to see exactly who did it. There were others, on the left and right, who used the term as well. But they were using it in reference to the controversy. The 4 I listed are the only ones who took the moveon.org ball and ran with it, using the term in reference to the general in a derogatory manner. By far the worst offender was mascale. The first page of search hits was nearly all him.

Thank you, my brotha!

And for the record, I'm not trying to claim some moral high ground here or anything. I mean, I'm in another thread wishing for Dick Cheney's heart to explode ferchristsakes. I just want to set the record straight here as to who was actually calling that man "Betrayus" and how little it was embraced and repeated by "liberals."

Holy shit!

No way!

Cheney has a heart?????
 
This is a political question, not about the military.

Remember the NYTimes ad calling Petrayus, "Betrayus?"

Remember the Democrats that called him a liar about the surge?

Now all of a sudden, all that gets flushed down the memory hole and Obama has made this wonderful choice?

I've heard rumors that Moveon, has deleted the "Betrayus" ad from their website and google has deleted it from their cache!

Are liberals this openly hypocritical that they think they can pretend "Betrayus" never happened and we all will forget the very recent past?

I can't be the only one who remembers Democrats calling Petrayus a liar on the surge.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

So did Obama make a bad choice or not?
 
Search term: Betrayus. Posts 2 weeks ago and older (to help sort the wheat from the chaff). User results:

Mascale, ABikerSailor, sealybobo and doniston.

Not they speak for liberals in general. I'm not disagreeing with your overall point. Thats not why I went looking. I was just bored and wanted to see exactly who did it. There were others, on the left and right, who used the term as well. But they were using it in reference to the controversy. The 4 I listed are the only ones who took the moveon.org ball and ran with it, using the term in reference to the general in a derogatory manner. By far the worst offender was mascale. The first page of search hits was nearly all him.

Thank you, my brotha!

And for the record, I'm not trying to claim some moral high ground here or anything. I mean, I'm in another thread wishing for Dick Cheney's heart to explode ferchristsakes. I just want to set the record straight here as to who was actually calling that man "Betrayus" and how little it was embraced and repeated by "liberals."

Holy shit!

No way!

Cheney has a heart?????

I think he's more robot now than anything. They just have to make up these "heart attacks" to tell the press when he needs to go in for an oil change.
 
This is a political question, not about the military.

Remember the NYTimes ad calling Petrayus, "Betrayus?"

Remember the Democrats that called him a liar about the surge?

Now all of a sudden, all that gets flushed down the memory hole and Obama has made this wonderful choice?

I've heard rumors that Moveon, has deleted the "Betrayus" ad from their website and google has deleted it from their cache!

Are liberals this openly hypocritical that they think they can pretend "Betrayus" never happened and we all will forget the very recent past?

I can't be the only one who remembers Democrats calling Petrayus a liar on the surge.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

So did Obama make a bad choice or not?

He made the right choice but all you will hear from the cartoons like teapartysamurai is a bunch of yipping about some stupid ad some stupid fringe group took out like three years ago.
 
Thank you, my brotha!

And for the record, I'm not trying to claim some moral high ground here or anything. I mean, I'm in another thread wishing for Dick Cheney's heart to explode ferchristsakes. I just want to set the record straight here as to who was actually calling that man "Betrayus" and how little it was embraced and repeated by "liberals."

Holy shit!

No way!

Cheney has a heart?????

I think he's more robot now than anything. They just have to make up these "heart attacks" to tell the press when he needs to go in for an oil change.

CheneyRobot.gif
 
Thank you, my brotha!

And for the record, I'm not trying to claim some moral high ground here or anything. I mean, I'm in another thread wishing for Dick Cheney's heart to explode ferchristsakes. I just want to set the record straight here as to who was actually calling that man "Betrayus" and how little it was embraced and repeated by "liberals."

You would enjoy these then Art:

Dick Cheney is in the hospital. Shouldn't have hidden that horcrux in a sea turtle. : news

I Will Post this Every time Mr. Cheney gets Sick : politics

There was a man who, everyday, would buy a newspaper on the way to work, glance at the headline, and hand it back to the newsboy. Day after day the man would go through this routine. Finally the newsboy could not stand it and he asked the man, "Why do you always buy a paper and only look at the front page before discarding it?"

The man replied, "I am only interested in the obituaries."

"But they are on page 21. You never even unfold the newspaper."

"Young man," he said, "the son of a bitch I'm looking for will be on the front page."
 
Frankly, I find it more than a wee bit ironic that right wing fringers are screaming about the past and Iraq war rhetoric after all the treason, terrorist loving, and anti-American BS accusations they spewed for years.
 
Yea Liberal Wankers never called Petraeus "Betrayus." Yup and i'm the Pope too. Liberal Wankers are liars. They shouldn't be trusted on anything. Who do they think they're fooling? They're only fooling themselves in the end. They know what they did. Lying about it now really is just plain sad & pathetic. What a scam.
 

Forum List

Back
Top