Geeeeeezzzzz

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Mr. P, Nov 3, 2004.

  1. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +618
    Damn that perky lil left wing Bitch!
    The first thing out of Katie Courics mouth this a.m. was "another Presidential election in question".
    Don't these MORONS!! ever accept the voice of the people?
     
  2. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    LOL you need to go through you recipes for Crow and whip her up your best one !!!!!!
     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    You think Hillary is in charge of making the call now ?

    BTW--If she would have stumped some more for Kerry he would have won--that cracks me up !!
     
  4. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +618
    I'd never cook for that witch, but I guess there is a positive there, if she's eating she can't talk!:D
     
  5. KarlMarx
    Offline

    KarlMarx Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    ...
    Ratings:
    +490
    Maybe she didn't want Kerry to win....

    I find it interesting that the divisive politics that we now are all too familiar with actually started in earnest during the Clinton years. Is that a coincidence? I don't think so.

    Both Hillary and Bill Clinton are radicals from the 1960s. They have studied Marxist and Socialist literature. After I read/heard about Hillary's college days and some of things she was up to at Yale Law School...I am convinced that she (and Bill) have changed the Democratic Party into their image.

    That is, a party of confrontation, not compromise, a party of rhetoric not deeds, a party that demonizes the opposition, a party that is in love with power for its own sake, not as a means of accomplishing an end e.g. furthering the public good.

    The Democratic Party would be doing itself a big favor if it took the likes of those two vultures and threw them out of the party. It would be doing itself a big favor if it truly started pursuing a populist/centrist policy. What I am inferring is a party that is more like that of FDR and JFK (the REAL JFK) than of Ho Chi Minh and Chairman Mao.

    But I don't think it will happen because many of the Democratic Party elites are themselves 1960s radicals schooled in the philosophies of Marx and Lenin. They've embraced the likes of Hillary and Bill Clinton, and in the process made a deal with the Devil.

    So what is left of the Democratic Party is a sham, an empty shell of what it once was. A party of obfuscation and denigration. It accomplishes nothing, has no new ideas. Its solutions are more government (which increases their power) or blaming Bush (demonizing the opposition).

    Like Ronald Reagan once said "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, it left me". I think that speaks for some of us on this board as well.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    Fully Agreed-----I'm wondering if the Dems can accept that the Clintons torpedoed Kerry
     

Share This Page