Gay Couple Says Waitress Told Them 'We Don't Serve Fags Here'

Thanks for the image, WeightWatchers.



Many angry Lesbians do dream of cutting off dangling penises because they suffer from penis envy big time... So "dike" makes for a perfect slang term to describe them.



You've been a great help...lol



Well, that's fascinating. Where the heck do you get THAT from? :rofl: :rofl:





And again...."dike"....:lmao:



Do you use dildos with your partners or have you ever used a dildo with your partners?


Look Bod, another moron that doesn't know porn is free on the internet to satisfy his voyeristic tendencies.
 
Seawench is the perfect example of the convoluted thinking of fags & dikes. They think annoying normal people will gain them acceptance. Boy oh boy, they couldn't be any dumber than that...actually they can..but you get the point.



"Dikes"....:rofl:





85.jpg






Although I'm not sure what wire-cutters have to do with the conversation.







>>>>


A pair of dikes can't compare to a pair of dykes.

images
 
ahhh... Don't like where the question might take her so you make up some ad hominem nonsense to distract. I am sure Bodey ain't my type, I am simply going to answer her question, so I asked her that question to help her understand my point. Don't be scurred, bodey, don't be scurred.

Just answer honestly and I will continue being honest as I always have been on here with you.

Well, that's fascinating. Where the heck do you get THAT from? :rofl: :rofl:





And again...."dike"....:lmao:



Do you use dildos with your partners or have you ever used a dildo with your partners?


Look Bod, another moron that doesn't know porn is free on the internet to satisfy his voyeristic tendencies.
 
Thanks for the image, WeightWatchers.



Many angry Lesbians do dream of cutting off dangling penises because they suffer from penis envy big time... So "dike" makes for a perfect slang term to describe them.



You've been a great help...lol



Well, that's fascinating. Where the heck do you get THAT from? :rofl: :rofl:





And again...."dike"....:lmao:



Do you use dildos with your partners or have you ever used a dildo with your partners?


Do you?
 
Fertility isn't an "issue" regarding Civil Marriage at all. Why do you want to make it one?







No, actually they aren't that different and they are absolutely no different than sterile or childless by choice couples. You want to only discriminate against one set. That makes you a bigot.







So, again, this matters because?



This matters because the two demographic groups cannot function the same.



Apples and oranges


Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.

Let's try this because you confuse the issue

Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.

100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.

So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.

Sorry, it appears they don't.
 
Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.

Let's try this because you confuse the issue

Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.

100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.

So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.

Sorry, it appears they don't.


You moved the goal posts Pop.


Isolate 100 fertile men on an island (gay or straight) and in one hundred years there will be no population.

Isolate 100 infertile men and women on an island (gay or straight) and in one hundred years there will be no population.



In a world where the population is 7,237,651,113 the fact that a small percentage of straights are infertile or if fertile homosexuals have relationships with those of the same sex - ain't going to have no impact on world population. It will still grow based on the other 97% of use.



>>>>
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the image, WeightWatchers.

Many angry Lesbians do dream of cutting off dangling penises because they suffer from penis envy big time... So "dike" makes for a perfect slang term to describe them.

You've been a great help...lol

Well, that's fascinating. Where the heck do you get THAT from? :rofl: :rofl:


And again...."dike"....:lmao:

Do you use dildos with your partners or have you ever used a dildo with your partners?

Never have....why would we want something like that? Do you think that male parts are that essential? If you do....allow me to laugh! :rofl:
 
This matters because the two demographic groups cannot function the same.



Apples and oranges


Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.

Let's try this because you confuse the issue

Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.

100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.

So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.

Sorry, it appears they don't.

You put 50 gay men and 50 lesbians on an island together....you will have a population in 100 years....if they want one that first generation....after that, the 2nd generation will have hetero children.............

But, you seem to think that our population is in danger of being depleted due to gay people.....:lol:
 
Well, that's fascinating. Where the heck do you get THAT from? :rofl: :rofl:


And again...."dike"....:lmao:

Do you use dildos with your partners or have you ever used a dildo with your partners?

Never have....why would we want something like that? Do you think that male parts are that essential? If you do....allow me to laugh! :rofl:
I have my doubts about your honesty here, but okay I will take your word for it. I just remember you saying you have infact had sex with a man & enjoyed his penis, but oh well. Are you denying that many lesbian couples use strap-on dildos on their partners? If so...please allow me to laugh my ass off!
 
Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.

Let's try this because you confuse the issue

Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.

100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.

So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.

Sorry, it appears they don't.


You moved the goal posts Pop.


Isolate 100 fertile men on an island (gay or straight) and in one hundred years there will be no population.

Isolate 100 infertile men and women on an island (gay or straight) and in one hundred years there will be no population.



In a world where the population is 7,237,651,113 the fact that a small percentage of straights are infertile or if fertile homosexuals have relationships with those of the same sex - ain't going to have no impact on world population. It will still grow based on the other 97% of use.



>>>>

Thus proving the two demographic groups are nowhere near the same.

Thanks, once again, comparing a bicycle to a jet fighter

Oh, I never moved the goal post. The goal post was always demographic groups. Your attempt to move them was caught and shown.

Straight men pair with women. I know that's an odd concept for y'all.
 
Last edited:
Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.

Let's try this because you confuse the issue

Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.

100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.

So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.

Sorry, it appears they don't.


You moved the goal posts Pop.


Isolate 100 fertile men on an island (gay or straight) and in one hundred years there will be no population.

Isolate 100 infertile men and women on an island (gay or straight) and in one hundred years there will be no population.



In a world where the population is 7,237,651,113 the fact that a small percentage of straights are infertile or if fertile homosexuals have relationships with those of the same sex - ain't going to have no impact on world population. It will still grow based on the other 97% of use.



>>>>

There is no danger of under population should all gay humans have the rights set forth in the US Constitution, yes. Though I think 3% gay humans is low, closer to 6%.
 
This matters because the two demographic groups cannot function the same.







Apples and oranges





Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.



Let's try this because you confuse the issue



Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.



100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.



So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.



Sorry, it appears they don't.


So? What does that have to do with civil marriage? Put 100 couples over the age of 60 on the island and you will get the same results. Put young infertile couples on your island, same result.

You keep repeating the "males and females procreate" line like it matters. Procreation isn't required for marriage, marriage isn't required to procreate and it's love, not DNA, that makes a family.
 
Well, that's fascinating. Where the heck do you get THAT from? :rofl: :rofl:


And again...."dike"....:lmao:

Do you use dildos with your partners or have you ever used a dildo with your partners?

Never have....why would we want something like that? Do you think that male parts are that essential? If you do....allow me to laugh! :rofl:

Those male parts are 50% responsible for all Human life.

Essential? You bet your ass they are.
 
Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.



Let's try this because you confuse the issue



Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.



100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.



So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.



Sorry, it appears they don't.


So? What does that have to do with civil marriage? Put 100 couples over the age of 60 on the island and you will get the same results. Put young infertile couples on your island, same result.

You keep repeating the "males and females procreate" line like it matters. Procreation isn't required for marriage, marriage isn't required to procreate and it's love, not DNA, that makes a family.

I find this laughable.

You can't argue complete demographic groups!

Lol

Male/female coupling is responsible for all human life

Same sex coupling = Zero

I don't have to break down the group to make it any lower than it already is. Zero is the absolute low.

One demographic group = 100%

The other group = 0%

No, they are not equal, and more to the point, Man did not create the inequity.

This you must simply deal with
 
Do you use dildos with your partners or have you ever used a dildo with your partners?

Never have....why would we want something like that? Do you think that male parts are that essential? If you do....allow me to laugh! :rofl:

Those male parts are 50% responsible for all Human life.

Essential? You bet your ass they are.
You're right, but she was refering to them not being essential for her to enjoy her perversion in the bedroom. They're homosexuals and base their entire life on that fact, sex on the mind...all other aspects of reality be damned as long as she can be a deviant pervert.
 
Never have....why would we want something like that? Do you think that male parts are that essential? If you do....allow me to laugh! :rofl:

Those male parts are 50% responsible for all Human life.

Essential? You bet your ass they are.
You're right, but she was refering to them not being essential for her to enjoy her perversion in the bedroom. They're homosexuals and base their entire life on that fact, sex on the mind...all other aspects of reality be damned as long as she can be a deviant pervert.

Gay humans have been known in every society ever known. How can a human trait be a "deviant perversion"?
 
Fertile and infertile straight couples do not "function" the same. Why do you try to create differences where there are none? You are a bigot if you want to grant civil marriage to infertile straight couples and deny it to gay couples.



Let's try this because you confuse the issue



Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.



100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.



So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.



Sorry, it appears they don't.


So? What does that have to do with civil marriage? Put 100 couples over the age of 60 on the island and you will get the same results. Put young infertile couples on your island, same result.

You keep repeating the "males and females procreate" line like it matters. Procreation isn't required for marriage, marriage isn't required to procreate and it's love, not DNA, that makes a family.

Yes, love creates a family, not sexual orientation.
 
Those male parts are 50% responsible for all Human life.

Essential? You bet your ass they are.
You're right, but she was refering to them not being essential for her to enjoy her perversion in the bedroom. They're homosexuals and base their entire life on that fact, sex on the mind...all other aspects of reality be damned as long as she can be a deviant pervert.

Gay humans have been known in every society ever known. How can a human trait be a "deviant perversion"?

Straw man

Exchange gay humans for murders, cheats, frauds, pedophiles or rapists. They all have existed throughout history, therefor?

All of the above have been discriminated against? How exactly?
 
Let's try this because you confuse the issue



Take 100 gay men and put them on an island alone, no visitors allowed, with everything they need to live. Mix them some fertile, some not. Do the same with gay women and on a third a mixture of heterosexual men and women, some fertile, some not.



100 years from now only the island with heterosexuals will have population.



So now, explain how the demographic groups function the same.



Sorry, it appears they don't.


So? What does that have to do with civil marriage? Put 100 couples over the age of 60 on the island and you will get the same results. Put young infertile couples on your island, same result.

You keep repeating the "males and females procreate" line like it matters. Procreation isn't required for marriage, marriage isn't required to procreate and it's love, not DNA, that makes a family.

Yes, love creates a family, not sexual orientation.

But only one coupling can create a family that consists of more than two. Even same sex adoptive couples rely on that formula.
 

Forum List

Back
Top