Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #161
Then why were you so VERY bad at conveying your "knowledge"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Relax, there is good news.
The people broke up the dictatorship and sent a senator to washington to stop the madness.
It was in all the papers.
LMAO,
Partisan faith is pathetic.
I recall hearing similar stuff in 2000.
Your simple mind continues to expose itself.
What am I 'partisan' for genius?
So shall we chisel the tombstone?This is the thought that has been running through my head for the last 24 hours.
Game Over, this country is soon to be dead.
The great American experiment with democracy is done.
I have been tellinig you for a few years that the golden age of America is past.
All or none.That would be fine with me as long as the corps do not get to flood our elections with LIES right before an election.
USCITIZEN I have a great compromise idea that you might like.
This may have been suggested already but here goes.
Lets put a cap on the maximum amount an individual can donate to a campaign. For the sake of this I'll say its $5,000.
Since corporations are individuals they are not allowed to donate or spend more than $5,000 on a campaign.
Seems simple enough to me, what say you?
All or none.That would be fine with me as long as the corps do not get to flood our elections with LIES right before an election.
Why is it libs can't get that concept. If corps shouldn't get it, neither should your unions. Hey just think! You wouldn't have been able to put those damn teacher union paid ads out there, but John Kerry couldn't have been swiftboated.
Butch up Sally, you got the "All" option.
Sorry, bleed over from a global warming thread. I apologize.All or none.That would be fine with me as long as the corps do not get to flood our elections with LIES right before an election.
Why is it libs can't get that concept. If corps shouldn't get it, neither should your unions. Hey just think! You wouldn't have been able to put those damn teacher union paid ads out there, but John Kerry couldn't have been swiftboated.
Butch up Sally, you got the "All" option.
DUDE I just said I agreed.
Whats with the knee jerk evil in your head?
That would be fine with me as long as the corps do not get to flood our elections with LIES right before an election.
USCITIZEN I have a great compromise idea that you might like.
This may have been suggested already but here goes.
Lets put a cap on the maximum amount an individual can donate to a campaign. For the sake of this I'll say its $5,000.
Since corporations are individuals they are not allowed to donate or spend more than $5,000 on a campaign.
Seems simple enough to me, what say you?
Sorry, bleed over from a global warming thread. I apologize.All or none.
Why is it libs can't get that concept. If corps shouldn't get it, neither should your unions. Hey just think! You wouldn't have been able to put those damn teacher union paid ads out there, but John Kerry couldn't have been swiftboated.
Butch up Sally, you got the "All" option.
DUDE I just said I agreed.
Whats with the knee jerk evil in your head?
USCITIZEN I have a great compromise idea that you might like.
This may have been suggested already but here goes.
Lets put a cap on the maximum amount an individual can donate to a campaign. For the sake of this I'll say its $5,000.
Since corporations are individuals they are not allowed to donate or spend more than $5,000 on a campaign.
Seems simple enough to me, what say you?
sounds great to me.
They are 1 "individual" so the same limitations as on real individual.
USCITIZEN I have a great compromise idea that you might like.
This may have been suggested already but here goes.
Lets put a cap on the maximum amount an individual can donate to a campaign. For the sake of this I'll say its $5,000.
Since corporations are individuals they are not allowed to donate or spend more than $5,000 on a campaign.
Seems simple enough to me, what say you?
sounds great to me.
They are 1 "individual" so the same limitations as on real individual.
Exactly. That would make it a lot easier to accept IF that is the case.
It makes too much sense for congress to even think about it though
This is the thought that has been running through my head for the last 24 hours.
Game Over, this country is soon to be dead.
The great American experiment with democracy is done.
We have problems , Obama and his progressive movement are not the answer anymore so then when Wilson had them.
The People are the answer, and the people united can never be defeated.