actsnoblemartin
I love Andrea & April
Larkinn, to assume that only a.001% muslims are terrorists is absurd. This hatred of america is taugh in madrassas all over the world including the u.s., while i would agree its not all of them, it is just as silly to say virtually none of them. In wwII, when we spoke of nazi's , did we ever say, not all germans were nazi's, no because we didnt need to be politically correct, and youre wrong sir, and attack on our ally, is an attack on us, because hazbollah wants to kill americans, any islamo-nazi group, has the same ideology, kill non muslims, including america. The problem with your thinking is, before 9/11 the u.s. did nothing to help our allies like israel, and other nations deal with terrorism, and look what happened. We cannot afford to ignore even one terrorist group any longer, now, i dont know if you believe hezbollah killed 241 americans, but if you dont , you are wrong, and while maybe hezbollah should be 2nd on our list, and splinter groups, possibly not ahead of al queda, they all must be taken out. Every last one of them, and we must never end the war on terrorism, because terrorism doesnt end, its like cancer, once you become complacent, and believe its gone, it comes back, and kills you.
It does not imply that at all. I was talking about Muslims, not "militant Islamic jihadists". Please don't conflate the two, as they are very very different.
Did you miss the part where I said I was willing to give, for the sake of argument, that Muslims were responsible for all acts of terrorism? But again...please don't conflate militant Islamic fundamentalists with Muslims.
I will post my main point for you again Gunny.
That all terrorists are Muslims does NOT mean that all Muslims are terrorists. Hence my point in saying the number of Muslims there are in this world when someone says that we should suspect all Muslims based on the actions of less than .001%