OCA
VIP Member
Originally posted by Psychoblues
Lemme get this correct. OCA is saying that Moore, in the vein of Milli Vanilli, didn't actually produce or direct anything on this documentary or just what is it to earn the comparison? And somehow this is classic? I thought the article did a great service by offering a mention of prior critisisms of Mr. Moore's work, just for balance I presume, and then lending gratitude for the improvements in objectivity that Mr. Moore demonstrates in this most recent piece, Fahrenheit 9/11. Maybe I just mistook the meaning?
Psychoblues
No no Psycho Moore should get all the credit for all the half truths, mischaracterizations and outright lies in his past films and to which i'm sure this film is based. The comparison to Milli Vanilli is he bases his product on lies just as Milli Vanilli based their product on a lie that the recorded voices were their own.
Lies Psycho its all about lies.
Boy this should be an interesting election season leading up to the Bush landslide in November. Libs are frothing at the mouth and stopping at nothing to regain power.