CDZ For the 3rd world, Is sterilization inhumane?

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by MarathonMike, Jul 16, 2017.

  1. MarathonMike
    Offline

    MarathonMike Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,702
    Thanks Received:
    1,798
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    The Southwestern Desert
    Ratings:
    +9,871
    For impoverished families WHO ALREADY HAVE CHILDREN, is it inhumane to require them to have vasectomies/tubal ligation in exchange for food relief and general health services? Or is it inhumane to provide the food and health services to impoverished families and not require sterilization?

    I would argue the latter given the horrific life these children endure living in dirt and squalor and wondering if they will get anything to eat or drink. And what kind of life is it for the parents who live with the cries of their children from morning til night and not being able to ease their pain? I would like to hear the counter to his argument because I can see no virtue in doing nothing to curb the crisis of poverty in 3rd world countries.

    Everyone should be allowed to experience having a family, but there should be a limit when you have shown your inability to provide for them.
     
  2. JGalt
    Offline

    JGalt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,753
    Thanks Received:
    869
    Trophy Points:
    365
    Location:
    North
    Ratings:
    +4,776
    Like the old saying goes: "If ya can't feed 'em, don't breed 'em."
     
  3. cnelsen
    Offline

    cnelsen Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2016
    Messages:
    3,667
    Thanks Received:
    430
    Trophy Points:
    160
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    Ratings:
    +2,710
    For every lovely on the dole,
    Mandatory birth control.

    Problem solved. No coercion. Everybody wins. Simple as pie. Will never happen.
     
  4. irosie91
    Offline

    irosie91 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    52,019
    Thanks Received:
    3,959
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +14,636
    a very hard discussion------forced sterilization--------always an atrocity. ------there are other ways.
    ---reversible
     
  5. koshergrl
    Offline

    koshergrl Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    10,733
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +31,238
    Yes.
    For one thing, they have a higher death rate, so they need to have a higher birth rate to ofset it. Otherwise, you're just contributing to genocide.
     
  6. irosie91
    Offline

    irosie91 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    52,019
    Thanks Received:
    3,959
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +14,636
    don't push it K-girl. ---------your comment made me ITCH
     
  7. koshergrl
    Offline

    koshergrl Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    10,733
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +31,238
    History of Forced Sterilization and Current U.S. Abuses - Our Bodies Ourselves
     
  8. irosie91
    Offline

    irosie91 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    52,019
    Thanks Received:
    3,959
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +14,636
    yeah----touchy history
     
  9. MarathonMike
    Offline

    MarathonMike Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2014
    Messages:
    5,702
    Thanks Received:
    1,798
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    The Southwestern Desert
    Ratings:
    +9,871
    If you make sterilization contingent upon ONLY existing families receiving food and health services, then there is no forced sterilization.
     
  10. koshergrl
    Offline

    koshergrl Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    10,733
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +31,238
    Historically, that has never been the way it plays out.
     

Share This Page