Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 54,242
- 16,467
- 2,250
Laws are in place already protecting against racial discrimination. Since this isn't about race, but is instead about lifestlyes repugnant to the majority, we aren't even talking about the same considerations.It's unfortunate that the crafters of the "civil rights" act were too short sighted to see the torrent of unforeseen consequences. The only sure remedy is a repeal of the public accommodation portion of the law and a full return to the concept of freedom of association.
Which worked so well before.
Says you. The USSC on the other hand cited 4 different race based cases between the Romer and Windsor ruling when describing why the rights of gays couldn't be violated.
You insist that citing race based cases is legally irrelevant. The USSC cited race based cases 4 times.
I'm gonna have to with the USSC on what's legally relevant.